ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the association between coronary collateral circulation and ventricular contractile function in patients with non-reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Method: A retrospective and descriptive clinical study was conducted on patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at a reference cardiovascular center, from January 2006 to December 2022. Coronary angiographies and echocardiograms were reviewed to evaluate coronary collateral circulation and ventricular function, respectively. Patients were divided into groups based on the presence of collateral circulation. Both groups were compared and mortality during the index hospitalization was analyzed. Results: Out of a total of 14,985 patients with acute coronary syndrome, 8134 (54.3%) had the diagnosis of STEMI. We excluded 12,880, leaving a total of 2105 non-reperfused STEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography, revealing lesions. There were more patients without collateral circulation: 1547 (73.5%) vs. 558 (26.5%) (p = 0.025). Patients without collateral circulation had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (median of 47% vs. 42%; p < 0.001). Mortality in patients with collateral circulation was higher compared to those without it (11.6% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.225), but statistical significance was not reached. Conclusions: Non-reperfused STEMI patients did not show protection from collateral circulation when assessing left ventricular systolic function. We did not find a difference in mortality compared to the population without development of collateral circulation.
Objetivo: Evaluar la asociación entre la circulación coronaria colateral y la función contráctil ventricular en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio no reperfundido. Método: Estudio observacional descriptivo y retrospectivo en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST) en un centro cardiovascular de referencia, de enero de 2006 a diciembre de 2022. Se analizaron las coronariografías y los ecocardiogramas para evaluar la circulación coronaria colateral y la función ventricular, respectivamente. Se dividieron en grupos de acuerdo con la presencia de circulación colateral. Se compararon ambos grupos y se analizó la mortalidad durante la hospitalización del evento índice. Resultados: De 14,985 pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo, 8134 (54.3%) presentaron IAMCEST. Se excluyeron 12,880, quedando así 2105 pacientes con IAMCEST no reperfundidos y sometidos a coronariografía, revelando lesiones. Hubo más pacientes sin circulación colateral: 1547 (73.5%) vs. 558 (26.5%) (p = 0.025). Los pacientes sin circulación colateral presentaron una mayor fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda (mediana del 47% vs. 42%; p < 0.001). La mortalidad en los pacientes con circulación colateral fue mayor que en los pacientes sin ella (11.6% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.225), pero no se alcanzó significancia estadística. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con IAMCEST no reperfundidos no presentaron protección por la circulación colateral al evaluar la función sistólica ventricular izquierda. No se encontró diferencia en la mortalidad en comparación con la población sin desarrollo de circulación colateral.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: An important challenge in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases is the optimization of risk factors (RFs) after hospital discharge. These have been shown to be insufficiently controlled in clinical practice. AIM: To evaluate whether secondary prevention goals were met at our institution at 12 months after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) index event, as well as analyzing if achieving these goals was associated with a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). METHODS: Retrospective cohort of patients with a former diagnosis of ACS over a period of 4 years. To evaluate the proportion of patients who met RF control goals at 12 months after the index event, we used two sets of preestablished goals: stringent and lenient. During follow-up we evaluated the occurrence of MACE, defined by the following: ACS, coronary revascularization, stroke, hospitalization because of acute heart failure and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: We included 468 patients during the study period. The mean age of the patients was 60 ± 10.76 years, 20.5% were women, and mean follow-up was 41.8 ± 22.0 months. The proportion of patients that met all secondary prevention stringent and lenient goals accounted for 5.5% and 17.2%, respectively, and 8% did not achieve any target. Overall, 9.6% presented the composite of MACE during follow-up. The number of RFs in control at 12 months was associated with a lower rate of MACE, both with stringent and lenient goals. CONCLUSION: Achieving established goals for modifiable RFs can lower the incidence of MACE during long-term follow-up.
