ABSTRACT
Objetivo. El manual pretende ser una guía, accesible y fácil de consultar, que oriente a los profesionales en la elaboración o adaptación de documentos basados en la evidencia que ayuden a la estandarización de la práctica clínica y a la toma de decisiones velando siempre por la calidad de la misma de forma que siga unos referentes establecidos. Material y métodos. La Comisión de Atención Sanitaria Basada en la Evidencia (CASBE), perteneciente a la estructura de calidad del Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, propuso elaborar un manual para la elaboración de documentos basados en la evidencia que incorpore la relación de productos, la descripción de sus características, atributos, utilidad, metodología de elaboración y ámbito de aplicación de cada uno de ellos. Resultados. El manual contiene 7 herramientas basadas en la evidencia, un capítulo sobre metodología de análisis crítico de la literatura científica, un capítulo con recursos en Internet y anexos con herramientas de evaluación. Conclusiones. Este manual ofrece grandes oportunidades para la mejora de la calidad a los clínicos como guía de estandarización de la práctica asistencial, a los gestores como estrategia para promover y fomentar la elaboración de documentos que ayuden a reducir la variabilidad de la práctica clínica y a los pacientes la oportunidad de participar en la planificación de sus cuidados(AU)
Objectives. This handbook is intended to be an accessible, easy-to-consult guide to help professionals produce or adapt Evidence-Based Documents. Such documents will help standardize both clinical practice and decision-making, the quality always being monitored in such a way that established references are complied with. Materials and methods. Evidence-Based Health Care Committee, a member of Virgen del Rocío University Hospital quality structure, proposed the preparation of a handbook to produce Evidence-Based Documents including: a description of products, characteristics, qualities, uses, methodology of production, and application scope of every one of them. Results. The handbook consists of seven Evidence-Based tools, one chapter on critical analysis methodology of scientific literature, one chapter with internet resources, and some appendices with different assessment tools. Conclusions. This Handbook provides general practitioners with a great opportunity to improve quality and as a guideline to standardize clinical healthcare, and managers with a strategy to promote and encourage the development of documents in an effort to reduce clinical practice variability, as well as giving patients the opportunity of taking part in planning their own care(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Knowledge , Knowledge Management for Health Research , Knowledge Management/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , 24419 , Health Surveys/methods , Health Surveys/trends , /organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/standardsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This handbook is intended to be an accessible, easy-to-consult guide to help professionals produce or adapt Evidence-Based Documents. Such documents will help standardize both clinical practice and decision-making, the quality always being monitored in such a way that established references are complied with. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evidence-Based Health Care Committee, a member of "Virgen del Rocío" University Hospital quality structure, proposed the preparation of a handbook to produce Evidence-Based Documents including: a description of products, characteristics, qualities, uses, methodology of production, and application scope of every one of them. RESULTS: The handbook consists of seven Evidence-Based tools, one chapter on critical analysis methodology of scientific literature, one chapter with internet resources, and some appendices with different assessment tools. CONCLUSIONS: This Handbook provides general practitioners with a great opportunity to improve quality and as a guideline to standardize clinical healthcare, and managers with a strategy to promote and encourage the development of documents in an effort to reduce clinical practice variability, as well as giving patients the opportunity of taking part in planning their own care.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Manuals as Topic , Writing/standards , Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Heart denervation is the primary cause of sinus tachycardia in transplant recipients. Drugs are usually needed to treat associated symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the novel I(f) channel antagonist ivabradine to control heart rate after transplantation. METHODS: Of 316 heart transplant recipients at a single center since 1991, ivabradine was administered in 15 patients, in addition to ß-blockers in 4 patients and contraindication to use of ß-blocker therapy in the others. A prospective follow-up study was conducted to identify possible adverse effects, tolerance, and drug effects on heart rate and control of symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 15 patients, 13 were men; overall mean (SD) patient age was 46 (4.6) years. In all patients, treatment was begun after verification of basal heart rate greater than 100 bpm and after other causes of sinus tachycardia had been ruled out. During follow-up of 1.13 (0.3) years, no substantial adverse effects were observed. It was possible to reach the maximum drug dosage in all patients, achieving a reduction in basal heart rate of 33 (6.2) bpm. All patients reported substantial clinical improvement, and demonstrated an increase in functional class. CONCLUSION: Ivabradine is safe, well tolerated, and effective in heart transplant recipients.
