Male breast carcinoma: an evaluation of prognostic factors contributing to a poorer outcome.

BACKGROUND: Although breast cancer in men is far less common than breast cancer in women, it is associated with a less favorable prognosis. Conventional histopathologic features and new prognostic markers were evaluated to explain the less favorable survival outcome. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive male breast carcinomas were studied for size, histologic and nuclear grade, histologic subtype, presence of carcinoma in situ, nipple involvement, lymphovascular invasion, hormone receptor status, c-erbB-2 protein overexpression, and p53 protein accumulation. These findings were correlated with survival. RESULTS: Of the 46 carcinomas, 4 were noninvasive and 42 were invasive. In the invasive carcinomas, the median patient age was 64 years, and the median tumor size was 2 cm. The predominant histologic patterns were invasive ductal (45%) and mixed invasive ductal and cribriform (28%). Most tumors were of low histologic and nuclear grades (histologic grades: I, 17%; II, 50%; III, 33%; nuclear grade: I, 12%; II, 44%; III, 44%). Of those surgically staged, 22 patients (60%) were lymph node positive and 15 patients (40%) were node negative. Stage at presentation was higher than in women (0, 10%; 1, 17%; 2, 50%; 3, 13%; 4, 10%). The estrogen and progesterone receptor status was positive in 76% and 83% of tumors, respectively. Lymphatic vessel invasion (63%) and nipple involvement (48%) were also more common than in women. True Paget's disease of the nipple was not seen; all cases with nipple ulceration were the result of direct tumor extension to the epidermis. Of the 17 tumors tested, 41% were c-erbB-2 positive and 29% were p53 positive. Survival analysis was limited by the relatively small cohort size. Five- and 10-year adjusted overall survival rates for invasive tumors were 76 +/- 7% and 42 +/- 9%, respectively. Skin and nipple involvement (P = 0.03) and c-erbB-2-positivity (P = 0.03) were significant predictors of adverse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Male breast carcinoma presents in an advanced stage with less favorable survival, despite low histologic grade, high estrogen receptor content, and small size. Anatomic factors may have been responsible for the poor survival outcome (i.e., paucity of breast tissue and close tumor proximity to skin and nipple, facilitating dermal lymphatic spread and early regional and distant metastasis).

The role of immunocytochemical markers in the differential diagnosis of proliferative and neoplastic lesions of the breast.

The differential expression of keratins in myoepithelial and epithelial cells of the breast makes immunohistochemical distinction of lesions an attractive possibility. High molecular weight keratin, 34BE12, is a monoclonal antibody that recognizes keratins 1, 5, 10, and 14. Because myoepithelial cells predominantly express keratins 5 and 14 and epithelial cells predominantly express keratins 8 and 18, it is natural to assume that 34BE12 may be a good marker of myoepithelial cells but not epithelial cells. However, recent studies of the breast have reported conflicting results. To determine the potential role of 34BE12 in the breast, we studied by immunohistochemistry 19 tubular carcinomas, 14 radial scars, two microglandular adenoses, and 9 sclerosing adenoses, using monoclonal antibodies to high molecular weight keratin, smooth muscle actin, type IV collagen, and antiserum to S100 protein. Actin was negative in all 19 (100%) tubular carcinomas, but it delineated the myoepithelial cells in 22 of 23 (95.6%) benign lesions of sclerosing adenosis and radial scars; it was also negative in microglandular adenosis. In comparison, epithelial cytoplasmic 34BE12 reactivity was seen in 3 of 19 (15.8%) tubular carcinomas, whereas myoepithelial cells failed to react in 4 of 23 (17.3%) benign conditions. Antiserum to S100 protein had a similar disadvantage of labeling both epithelial and myoepithelial cells with reactivity in 5 of 19 (26.3%) tubular carcinomas. In microglandular adenosis, the epithelial cells were strongly S100 protein positive and focally 34BE12 positive, but no staining was observed for actin. Type IV collagen staining outlined distinct basement membranes in microglandular adenosis and other benign conditions but not in tubular carcinomas. However, staining for type IV collagen requires enzymatic pretreatment and is difficult to perform, especially in sclerotic breast tissue. In conclusion, actin appears to be the most consistent and specific marker for distinguishing tubular carcinomas from other benign conditions, and type IV collagen has a contributory role, whereas 34BE12 is less valuable than in prostatic biopsies.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the male breast is an uncommon disease, accounting for approximately 7% of all male breast carcinomas. Compared with invasive carcinomas of the breast, the prognosis associated with DCIS in men is excellent; however, clinical features, pathology, and treatment of this disease are not well defined in the literature. METHODS: Records of 23 men with carcinoma of the breast treated at the Lahey Clinic from 1968 to 1991 were reviewed, revealing 4 patients with pure DCIS (17%). The reported management of DCIS in women is discussed in comparison with that of DCIS in men. RESULTS: Of the four patients with DCIS, the presenting complaint was a retroareolar mass in three patients and a bloody nipple discharge in one patient. The pathologic subtype was papillary in one patient and intracystic papillary in three patients. Two patients were treated with partial mastectomy alone. Disease recurred locally as DCIS in both patients, requiring mastectomy at 30 and 108 months. No lymph node metastases were found in the three patients who underwent axillary dissection. All four patients were alive without disease at 133, 120, 36, and 32 months of follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size was small, our patients and a review of the literature suggest that most DCIS in men is of the papillary type and that mastectomy without axillary dissection is the preferred treatment.