[Treatment of uretero-renal stones with shock wave lithotripsy. Results and complications with the dornier gemini emse 220f-XXP.] / Tratamiento de la litiasis reno-ureteral con litotricia extracorpórea con ondas de choque. Resultados y complicaciones con el equipo Dornier Gemini EMSE 220f-XXP.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a minimally invasive therapeutic option for the treatment of renal-ureteral lithiasis. The aim of this study was to analyze the results and complications of shock wave extracorporeal lithotripsy treatment with the Dornier Gemini® Generator EMSE 220f-XXP device in patients with renal and ureteral lithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study including 377 patients with renal or ureteral lithiasis with indication for treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The following variables were analyzed, age, sex, body mass index, lithiasis size, lithiasis location, presence of urinary diversion, number of lithotripsy sessions, number of shock waves, fluoroscopy time, wave energy, applied focal energy coefficient, efficiency coefficient, lithiasic fragmentation, lithiasic clearance, residual lithiasis, presence of lithiasis and complications. The results were analyzed with SPSS 17.0 considering statistical significance p≤0.05. RESULTS: Of the 377 patients, 213 were men and 164 women, with a mean age of 51.28 ± 12.77 years. The mean size of the stones in maximum diameter was 11.77 ± 6.13 mm. Lithiasis fragmentation occurred in 81.9% of cases, with a percentage of residual lithiasis after the first session of 58.7% and a total or partial expulsion rate of lithiasis fragments of 68.3%, with global success at the end of sessions of lithotripsy of 69.8%. The overall Efficiency Ratio was 0.42, higher in upper calyx 0.51 and lower in medium calyx 0.35, with significant differences (p<0.05). The only differences were found in relation to the success of lithotripsy treatment (75% versus 64.6%, p=0.02), according to lithiasis size (≤10 mm maximum diameter in comparison to >10 mm). In patients with a DJ catheter there is a higher percentage of residual lithiasis (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with extracorporeal lithotripsy in small lithiasis and in well-selected patients obtains good results with a low rate of complications regardless of sex and body mass index.

OBJETIVOS: La litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque es una opción terapéutica mínimamente invasiva para el tratamiento de las litiasis reno-ureterales. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los resultados y complicaciones del tratamiento con litotricia extracorpórea con ondas de choque con el dispositivo de última generación Dornier Gemini® generador EMSE 220f-XXP en pacientes con litiasis renal y ureteral. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo en el que se incluyen 377 pacientes con litiasis renal o ureteral con indicación de tratamiento con litotricia extracorpórea con ondas de choque. Se analizan las siguientes variables que incluyen la edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, tamaño litiásico, localización de la litiasis, presencia de derivación urinaria, número de sesiones de litotricia, número de ondas de choque, tiempo de escopia, energía de las ondas, coeficiente de energía focal aplicada, coeficiente de eficiencia, fragmentación litiásica, expulsión litiásica, litiasis residual, presencia de calle litiásica y complicaciones. Se analizan los resultados con programa SPSS 17.0 considerando significación estadística p≤0,05. RESULTADOS: De los 377 pacientes, 213 fueron hombres y 164 mujeres, con edad media 51,28 ± 12,77 años. El tamaño medio de las litiasis en diámetro máximo fue de 11,77 ± 6,13 mm. Se produce fragmentación de la litiasis en el 81,9% de los casos, con un porcentaje de litiasis residual tras la primera sesión de 58,7% y una tasa de expulsión total o parcial de fragmentos litiásicos del 68,3%, con un éxito global al finalizar las sesiones de litotricia del 69,8%. El Coeficiente de Eficiencia global fue de 0,42, más elevado en cáliz superior 0,51 y más bajo en cáliz medio 0,35, con diferencias significativas (pencontradas se observan según tamaño litiásico (≤10 mm de diámetro máximo con respecto a >10mm) en relación al éxito del tratamiento con litotricia (75% versus 64,6%, catéter DJ existe un mayor porcentaje de litiasis residual (p=0,006). CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento con litotricia extracorpórea en litiasis de pequeño tamaño y en pacientes bien seleccionados obtiene buenos resultados con un bajo índice de complicaciones independientemente del sexo y del índice de masa corporal.

Tratamiento de la litiasis reno-ureteral con litotricia extracorpórea con ondas de choque. Resultados y complicaciones con el equipo Dornier Gemini EMSE 220f-XXP / Treatment of uretero-renal stones with shock wave lithotripsy. Results and complications with the dornier gemini emse 220f-XXP

Objetivos: La litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque es una opción terapéutica mínimamente invasiva para el tratamiento de las litiasis reno-ureterales. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los resultados y complicaciones del tratamiento con litotricia extracorpórea con ondas de choque con el dispositivo de última generación Dornier Gemini(R) generador EMSE 220f-XXP en pacientes con litiasis renal y ureteral. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en el que se incluyen 377 pacientes con litiasis renal o ureteral con indicación de tratamiento con litotricia extracorpórea con ondas de choque. Se analizan las siguientes variables que incluyen la edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, tamaño litiásico, localización de la litiasis, presencia de derivación urinaria, número de sesiones de litotricia, número de ondas de choque, tiempo de escopia, energía de las ondas, coeficiente de energía focal aplicada, coeficiente de eficiencia, fragmentación litiásica, expulsión litiásica, litiasis residual, presencia de calle litiásica y complicaciones. Se analizan los resultados con programa SPSS 17.0 considerando significación estadística p≤0,05. Resultados: De los 377 pacientes, 213 fueron hombres y 164 mujeres, con edad media 51,28 ± 12,77 años. El tamaño medio de las litiasis en diámetro máximo fue de 11,77 ± 6,13 mm. Se produce fragmentación de la litiasis en el 81,9% de los casos, con un porcentaje de litiasis residual tras la primera sesión de 58,7% y una tasa de expulsión total o parcial de fragmentos litiásicos del 68,3%, con un éxito global al finalizar las sesiones de litotricia del 69,8%. El Coeficiente de Eficiencia global fue de 0,42, más elevado en cáliz superior 0,51 y más bajo en cáliz medio 0,35, con diferencias significativas (p < 0,05). Las únicas diferencias encontradas se observan según tamaño litiásico (≤10 mm de diámetro máximo con respecto a >10mm) en relación al éxito del tratamiento con litotricia (75% versus 64,6%, (p = 0,006). Conclusión: El tratamiento con litotricia extracorpórea en litiasis de pequeño tamaño y en pacientes bien seleccionados obtiene buenos resultados con un bajo índice de complicaciones independientemente del sexo y del índice de masa corporal

Objectives: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a minimally invasive therapeutic option for the treatment of renal-ureteral lithiasis. The aim of this study was to analyze the results and complications of shock wave extracorporeal lithotripsy treatment with the Dornier Gemini (R) Generator EMSE 220f-XXP device in patients with renal and ureteral lithiasis. Material and methods: Retrospective study including 377 patients with renal or ureteral lithiasis with indication for treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The following variables were analyzed, age, sex, body mass index, lithiasis size, lithiasis location, presence of urinary diversion, number of lithotripsy sessions, number of shock waves, fluoroscopy time, wave energy, applied focal energy coefficient, efficiency coefficient, lithiasic fragmentation, lithiasic clearance, residual lithiasis, presence of lithiasis and complications. The results were analyzed with SPSS 17.0 considering statistical significance p≤0.05. RESULTS: Of the 377 patients, 213 were men and 164 women, with a mean age of 51.28 ± 12.77 years. The mean size of the stones in maximum diameter was 11.77 ± 6.13 mm. Lithiasis fragmentation occurred in 81.9% of cases, with a percentage of residual lithiasis after the first session of 58.7% and a total or partial expulsion rate of lithiasis fragments of 68.3%, with global success at the end of sessions of lithotripsy of 69.8%.The overall Efficiency Ratio was 0.42, higher in upper calyx 0.51 and lower in medium calyx 0.35, with significant differences (p<0.05). The only differences were found in relation to the success of lithotripsy treatment (75% versus 64.6%, p=0.02), according to lithiasis size (≤10 mm maximum diameter in comparison to >10 mm). In patients with a DJ catheter there is a higher percentage of residual lithiasis (p=0.006). Conclusions: Treatment with extracorporeal lithotripsy in small lithiasis and in well-selected patients obtains good results with a low rate of complications regardless of sex and body mass index

Risk of renal stone formation in patients treated with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogues for prostate cancer: importance of bone metabolism and urine calcium.

PURPOSE: To determine whether androgen blockade produces metabolic changes in urine and increases the risk of calculi after 1 year of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 38 patients, from the period April 2015 to June 2016, diagnosed with locally advanced prostate cancer or lymph node metastasis, and with an indication of androgen blockade. Androgen blockade was started with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues, and a blood specimen, a fasting urine and 24-h urine were collected at the time of inclusion, and then at 1 year of follow-up. A study was performed at baseline and at 1 year with imaging tests. An analysis of the variables was performed with a p ≤ 0.05 considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 72.26 ± 6.75 years. As regards the biochemistry parameters, an increase in osteocalcin (from 16.28 ± 9.48 to 25.56 ± 12.09 ng/ml; p = 0.001) and an increase in ß-crosslaps (from 0.419 ± 0.177 to 0.743 ± 0.268 ng/ml; p = 0.0001) were observed. In the urinary parameters, a significant increase was observed in the fasting calcium/creatinine ratio (from 0.08 ± 0.06 to 0.13 ± 0.06; p = 0.002) and in the 24-h calcium renal excretion (from 117.69 ± 66.92 to 169.42 ± 107.18 mg; p = 0.0001). Calculi formation was observed in 12 of the 38 patients included (31.6%), with a mean size of 3.33 ± 1.31 mm. CONCLUSION: Treatment with LHRH analogues, as well as increasing the appearance of metabolic syndrome and speeding up the loss bone mineral density, causes an increase in fasting urine calcium.

[Etiopathogenic factors of the different types of urinary litiasis.] / Factores etiopatogénicos de los diferentes tipos de urolitiasis.

In this review, we analyze the etiopathogenic principles of urinary lithiasis formation. In the kidney, calcifications that may cause renal lithiasis are produced as a consequence of processes that injury the urothelium at the papilla and Bellini's ducts. With the improvement of imaging techniques, mainly micro CT scan, it is possible to detect them and we may be able to anticipate to the formation of lithiasis. As we well know, there are different factors that influence the formation of the calculi depending on their composition. In calcium lithiasis it is key to review the modification of the categories of hypercalciuria, we currently distinguish two types instead of three, thanks to the fasting calcium/ creatinine ratio, differentiating absorptive hypercalciuria and fasting hypercalciuria. In the fasting hypercalciuria, it is important to emphasize the relationship between this factor and the loss of bone mineral density in patients with recurrent renal calcic lithiasis, so that in this kind of patients it is compulsory the study of bone metabolism by bone remodelling markers and bone densitometry. Regarding the other factors that participate in the formation of calcium lithiasis we should specially emphasize on hypercalciuria and its growing increase because of its relationship with obesity and metabolic syndrome, as well as hipocitraturia, present in an important percentage of patients and related in some cases with metabolic acidosis and osteopenia-osteoporosis too. In relation to uric acid lithiasis it should be highlighted that urinary pH is the most determinant factor and, therefore, its control and modifications would be paramount for prevention of this type of lithiasis. In the infectious lithiasis, the presence of germs that split urea is mandatory. They generate ammonia ions with the ability to injure the urothelium and to form magnesium ammonium phosphate lithiasis mainly. Regarding cystine lithiasis, rare, it was classically divided in three types and now passed to be classified in type A and B depending on the muted gene, and it is more useful to perform direct 24-hour urine measurement than screening tests which have low sensitivity. In general, we tried to give a comprehensive view of the various types of lithiasis emphasizing the most interesting clinical points for the urologist.

Factores etiopatogénicos de los diferentes tipos de urolitiasis / Etiopathogenic factors of the different types of urinary litiasis

En este artículo de revisión se analizan los principios etiopatogénicos de la formación de la litiasis urinaria. A nivel renal, como consecuencia de procesos que lesionan el urotelio se producen calcificaciones a nivel de la papila y de los conductos de Bellini que pueden ser causantes de la formación del cálculo renal. Con la mejora de las pruebas de imagen, fundamentalmente micro-TAC es posible detectarlas y podemos ser capaces de anticiparnos a la formación de la litiasis. Como bien conocemos, existen diferentes factores que influyen en la formación del cálculo y que dependerán de la composición de la misma. En la litiasis cálcica es fundamental reseñar la modificación de los tipos de hipercalciuria, actualmente distinguimos dos tipos en lugar de tres, gracias al cociente calcio/creatinina de ayunas, diferenciándose hipercalciuria absortiva e hipercalciuria de ayunas. En la hipercalciuria de ayunas es importante destacar la relación que existe entre este factor y la pérdida de densidad mineral ósea en pacientes con litiasis renal cálcica recidivante, siendo por tanto preceptivo el estudio del metabolismo óseo mediante marcadores de remodelado óseo y densitometría ósea en este tipo de pacientes. Respecto a los otros factores que intervienen en la formación de la litiasis cálcica debemos hacer especial hincapié en la hipercalciuria y su creciente aumento por su relación con la obesidad y el síndrome metabólico, así como la hipocitraturia, presente en un porcentaje importante de pacientes y relacionada en algunos casos con acidosis metabólica y también osteopenia-osteoporosis. Con respecto a la litiasis de ácido úrico hay que destacar que el pH urinario es el factor más determinante y que por tanto el control y las modificaciones del mismo serán fundamentales en la prevención de este tipo de litiasis. En la litiasis infectiva es obligatorio la presencia de gérmenes que desdoblen la urea, generándose iones de amonio, capaces de lesionar el urotelio y de formar litiasis de fosfato amónico magnésico fundamentalmente. En cuanto a la litiasis de cistina, poco frecuente, clásicamente dividida en 3 tipos, ha pasado a dividirse en tipo A y B en función del gen mutado y resulta más útil su medición directa en orina de 24 horas que realizar test de screening que tienen baja sensibilidad. En líneas generales, hemos tratado de dar una visión de conjunto de los diferentes tipos de litiasis haciendo hincapié en aquellos puntos más interesantes desde el punto de vista clínico para el urólogo

In this review, we analyze the etiopathogenic principles of urinary lithiasis formation. In the kidney, calcifications that may cause renal lithiasis are produced as a consequence of processes that injury the urothelium at the papilla and Bellini´s ducts. With the improvement of imaging techniques, mainly micro CT scan, it is possible to detect them and we may be able to anticipate to the formation of lithiasis. As we well know, there are different factors that influence the formation of the calculi depending on their composition. In calcium lithiasis it is key to review the modification of the categories of hypercalciuria, we currently distinguish two types instead of three, thanks to the fasting calcium/ creatinine ratio, differentiating absorptive hypercalciuria and fasting hypercalciuria. In the fasting hypercalciuria, it is important to emphasize the relationship between this factor and the loss of bone mineral density in patients with recurrent renal calcic lithiasis, so that in this kind of patients it is compulsory the study of bone metabolism by bone remodelling markers and bone densitometry. Regarding the other factors that participate in the formation of calcium lithiasis we should specially emphasize on hypercalciuria and its growing increase because of its relationship with obesity and metabolic syndrome, as well as hipocitraturia, present in an important percentage of patients and related in some cases with metabolic acidosis and osteopenia-osteoporosis too. In relation to uric acid lithiasis it should be highlighted that urinary pH is the most determinant factor and, therefore, its control and modifications would be paramount for prevention of this type of lithiasis. In the infectious lithiasis, the presence of germs that split urea is mandatory. They generate ammonia ions with the ability to injure the urothelium and to form magnesium ammonium phosphate lithiasis mainly. Regarding cystine lithiasis, rare, it was classically divided in three types and now passed to be classified in type A and B depending on the muted gene, and it is more useful to perform direct 24-hour urine measurement than screening tests which have low sensitivity. In general, we tried to give a comprehensive view of the various types of lithiasis emphasizing the most interesting clinical points for the urologist

Hematospermia as a Rare Form of Presentation of Zinner Syndrome.

A 17-year-old adolescent boy was referred to the urology department of our institution for hematospermia after initiation of sexual relationship. A magnetic resonance imaging scan showed giant dilation of a multicystic left seminal vesicle with left renal agenesis. These findings are typical of the Zinner syndrome. In 70%-80% of the cases when renal agenesis is found, there is an ipsilateral cystic dilation of the seminal vesicle that in some cases may be associated with testicular ectopia or absence of the bladder trigone. The ejaculatory ducts, which are formed from the mesonephric system, are abnormally developed in these cases.