Risk of unscheduled delivery in women with placenta accreta according to planned gestational age at delivery.

BACKGROUND: The optimal gestational age at delivery for stable women with suspected placenta accreta is still subject of debate. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the likelihood of vaginal bleeding necessitating expedited delivery in women with placenta accreta according to gestational age at planned cesarean hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter cohort study. Singleton pregnancies at risk of placenta accreta because of placenta previa in the setting of prior cesarean delivery were included. Outcomes were compared in cohort of women who had planned cesarean hysterectomy at 34 0/7 - 34 6/7 weeks versus at 35 0/7 - 35 6/7 weeks. The primary outcome was incidence of vaginal bleeding severe enough to necessitate delivery. RESULTS: 118 singleton pregnancies with placenta previa in the setting of prior cesarean delivery, and confirmed placenta accreta at the time of delivery were included in the study. Women who had planned cesarean hysterectomy at 34 weeks had lower episodes of vaginal bleeding severe enough to necessitate immediate or emergency delivery (20.6% vs 38.0%; odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.96). Eight women (11.8%) in the 34 weeks group and 6 women (12.0%) in the 35 weeks group delivered before the planned date due to onset of spontaneous labor (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.02). CONCLUSION: In singleton gestations with suspected placenta accreta, planned cesarean hysterectomy at 34 0/7 - 34 6/7 weeks was associated with a decreased chance of unscheduled delivery due to severe vaginal bleeding. CONDENSATION: In case of placenta accreta, planned cesarean hysterectomy at 34 weeks was associated with decreased chance of unscheduled delivery due to severe vaginal bleeding.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy as first-line therapy for patients with single, distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) as first-line treatments for patients with distal ureteric stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 273 patients with single, monolateral, radiopaque, distal ureteric stones of 0.5-1.5 cm were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial. Patients were randomized to undergo ESWL (137) or URS (136). The electromagnetic Modulith SLX lithotripter (Storz Medical, Switzerland) was used for ESWL and a semi-rigid ureteroscope was used for URS. Patients in both groups were compared for overall stone-free rates (SFRs), re-treatment rates, need for auxiliary procedures and complication rates. A subgroup analysis was performed in both groups according to stone size of ≤1 cm and >1 cm. RESULTS: Patients in the ESWL group achieved a 92.70% overall SFR with a 44.88% re-treatment rate and an 11.02% auxiliary procedure rate. Complications occurred in 15.32% of patients treated with ESWL. Patients in the URS group achieved a 94.85% overall SFR with a re-treatment rate of 7.75% and an auxiliary procedure rate of 18.60%. Complications occurred in 19.11% of patients treated with URS. In the ESWL group, the need for re-treatments and for auxiliary procedures as well as the incidence of complications was significantly higher in patients with stones of >1 cm. In patients with stones of ≤1 cm treated with ESWL the need for re-treatments and for auxiliary procedures as well as the incidence of complications was significantly lower than for those treated with URS. CONCLUSION: In centres where both techniques are available, ESWL should be the preferred treatment for patients with single distal ureteric stones of ≤1 cm and URS should be reserved for patients with stones of >1 cm.