ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound features help to differentiate benign from malignant masses, and some of them are included in the ultrasound (US) scores. The main aim of this work is to describe the ultrasound features of certain adnexal masses of difficult classification and to analyse them according to the most frequently used US scores. METHODS: Retrospective studies of adnexal lesions are difficult to classify by US scores in women undergoing surgery. Ultrasound characteristics were analysed, and masses were classified according to the Subjective Assessment of the ultrasonographer (SA) and other US scores (IOTA Simple Rules Risk Assessment-SRRA, ADNEX model with and without CA125 and O-RADS). RESULTS: A total of 133 adnexal masses were studied (benign: 66.2%, n:88; malignant: 33.8%, n:45) in a sample of women with mean age 56.5 ± 7.8 years. Malignant lesions were identified by SA in all cases. Borderline ovarian tumors (n:13) were not always detected by some US scores (SRRA: 76.9%, ADNEX model without and with CA125: 76.9% and 84.6%) nor were serous carcinoma (n:19) (SRRA: 89.5%), clear cell carcinoma (n:9) (SRRA: 66.7%) or endometrioid carcinoma (n:4) (ADNEX model without CA125: 75.0%). While most teratomas and serous cystadenomas have been correctly differentiated, other benign lesions were misclassified because of the presence of solid areas or papillae. Fibromas (n:13) were better identified by SA (23.1% malignancy), but worse with the other US scores (SRRA: 69.2%, ADNEX model without and with CA125: 84.6% and 69.2%, O-RADS: 53.8%). Cystoadenofibromas (n:10) were difficult to distinguish from malignant masses via all scores except SRRA (SA: 70.0%, SRRA: 20.0%, ADNEX model without and with CA125: 60.0% and 50.0%, O-RADS: 90.0%). Mucinous cystadenomas (n:12) were misdiagnosed as malignant in more than 15% of the cases in all US scores (SA: 33.3%, SRRA: 16.7%, ADNEX model without and with CA125: 16.7% and 16.7%, O-RADS:41.7%). Brenner tumors are also difficult to classify using all scores. CONCLUSION: Some malignant masses (borderline ovarian tumors, serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, endometrioid carcinomas) are not always detected by US scores. Fibromas, cystoadenofibromas, some mucinous cystadenomas and Brenner tumors may present solid components/papillae that may induce confusion with malignant lesions. Most teratomas and serous cystadenomas are usually correctly classified.
ABSTRACT
El sangrado menstrual abundante (SMA) es un trastorno con un gran impacto en la mujer que conlleva un empeoramiento de su calidad de vida. Los objetivos que persigue su tratamiento incluyen la corrección de la anemia, la disminución de la cantidad de sangrado, la prevención de recurrencias y de las consecuencias a largo plazo de la anovulación, y la mejora de la calidad de vida de la mujer. La elección del tratamiento debe basarse en la decisión de la mujer tras conocer las ventajas y efectos adversos de las diferentes opciones, teniendo en cuenta sus deseos reproductivos y preferencias personales. El tratamiento farmacológico debe considerarse cuando no se hayan identificado anomalías estructurales como causa del SMA. El tratamiento farmacológico no hormonal, es de primera elección en pacientes con SMA con ciclos ovulatorios, con deseos genésicos o con limitaciones al tratamiento hormonal; incluye los aintiinflamatorios no esteroideos y los antibibrinolíticos (especialmente ácido tranexámico). El tratamiento farmacológico hormonal es la opción más adecuada ante alteraciones de la ovulación que causan SMA. En España tienen indicación específica el DIU-LNG, de primera elección en mujeres que no planean un embarazo, y un combinado cuatrifásico con valerato de estradiol y dienogest (VE2-DNG) oral. Los SMA de causa orgánica requieren el abordaje quirúrgico de los procesos patológicos que los provocan. Las opciones terapéuticas que han demostrado eficacia son la ablación endometrial y la resección endometrial (mínimamente invasivas pero no siempre completamente exitosas) y la histerectomía (cirugía mayor). En la presente revisión se analizan todas ellas
Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a disorder with a major impact on the woman which is associated with a worsening of their quality of life. The objectives pursued with its treatment are correction of anemia, decrease of the amount of bleeding, prevention of recurrence and long-term consequences of anovulation, and improving the quality of life of women. The choice of treatment should be based on the decision of the woman after knowing the benefits and adverse effects of different options, taking into account their reproductive desires and personal preferences. Drug therapy should be considered when structural abnormalities have not been identified as the cause of HMB. Non-hormonal drug treatment is the first choice in patients with HMB with ovulatory cycles, with reproductive desires or limitations to hormone treatment; It includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatories and antifibrinolytics (especially tranexamic acid). The hormonal drug treatment is the best option in HMB caused by ovulation disorders. In Spain, the LNG-IUD has this specific indication, of first choice in women who may become pregnant, and an oral quadriphasic combined with estradiol valerate and dienogest (VE2-DNG). The HMB with organic cause require the surgical approach of the pathological processes that cause them. The treatment options that have proven efficacy are endometrial ablation and endometrial resection (minimally invasive but not always completely successful) and hysterectomy (major surgery). In this paper, we analyze all of them
