Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Menopause ; 16(5): 984-91, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19407667

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is increasing evidence to suggest that ossein-hydroxyapatite complex (OHC) is more effective than calcium supplements in maintaining bone mass. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether OHC has a different clinical effect on bone mineral density (BMD) compared with calcium carbonate (CC). METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of OHC versus CC on trabecular BMD. We identified publications on clinical trials by a search of electronic databases, including MEDLINE (1966-November 2008), EMBASE (1974-November 2008), and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register.The primary endpoint was percent change in BMD from baseline. Data were pooled in a random-effects model, and the weighted mean difference was calculated. A sensitivity analysis that excluded trials without full data was performed. RESULTS: Of the 18 controlled trials initially identified, 6 were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity among the included trials. The percent change in BMD significantly favored the OHC group (1.02% [95% CI, 0.63-1.41], P < 0.00001). These results were confirmed in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: OHC is significantly more effective in preventing bone loss than CC.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/prevention & control , Bone Resorption/prevention & control , Calcium Carbonate/therapeutic use , Durapatite/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Calcium Carbonate/pharmacology , Durapatite/pharmacology , Evidence-Based Practice , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...