Analysis of the approach to risk management in onco-hematology centers: results of a survey in Italy.

PURPOSE: Raccomandazione 14 (Recommendation 14), issued by the Italian Ministry of Health, is aimed at providing requirements for preventing medication errors with antineoplastic drugs. Raccomandazione 14 covers all steps of the process, from supply to administration of therapies with specific conclusive guidance on tools and methods to be adopted for the assessment and management of clinical risk. METHODS: A form and a score system were designed and provided to healthcare professionals for self-assessment of adherence to Raccomandazione 14. Data were collected during 2014-2015 and a score was given to each item. Specific gaps were listed for each center. RESULTS: A total of 27 healthcare institutions participated in the project, with 447 healthcare personnel (physician, nurses, and pharmacists) involved. The mean overall adherence score for all items covered by Raccomandazione 14 was 2.8 (out of 4). Items with scores <2.8 were considered priority targets for intervention for risk mitigation (general requirements, supply, oral administration, therapy management for injected antineoplastic drugs in home care setting administration, and involvement of patients in care process). The other items of Raccomandazione 14 defined as core processes in the management of anticancer therapies achieved an overall mean score of 3.1 (storage/inventory management, prescription, preparation, distribution, and administration). Following the analysis of the results, the 27 participating institutions activated a range of 3-29 actions/institution for improving adherence to best practice requirements. CONCLUSIONS: The survey was able to identify specific gaps with Raccomandazione 14 at different institutions throughout Italy so that the healthcare professionals involved were able to prioritize improvement actions that should be able to minimize risk in the management of oncologic drugs in the in-hospital setting.

Administrative risk quantification of subcutaneous and intravenous therapies in Italian centers utilizing the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis approach.

BACKGROUND: In oncology, an important parameter of safety is the potential treatment error in hospitals. The analyzed hypothesis is that of subcutaneous therapies would provide a superior safety benefit over intravenous therapies through fixed-dose administrations, when analyzed with trastuzumab and rituximab. METHODS: For the calculation of risk levels, the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis approach was applied. Within this approach, the critical treatment path is followed and risk classification for each individual step is estimated. For oncology and hematology administration, 35 different risk steps were assessed. The study was executed in 17 hematology and 16 breast cancer centers in Italy. As intravenous and subcutaneous were the only injection routes in medical available for trastuzumab and rituximab in oncology at the time of the study, these two therapies were chosen. RESULTS: When the risk classes were calculated, eight high-risk areas were identified for the administration of an intravenous therapy in hematology or oncology; 13 areas would be defined as having a median-risk classification and 14 areas as having a low-risk classification (total risk areas: n=35). When the new subcutaneous formulation would be applied, 23 different risk levels could be completely eliminated (65% reduction). Important high-risk classes such as dose calculation, preparation and package labeling, preparation of the access to the vein, pump infusion preparation, and infusion monitoring were included in the eliminations. The overall risk level for the intravenous administration was estimated to be 756 (ex-ante) and could be reduced by 70% (ex-post). The potential harm compensation for errors related to pharmacy would be decreased from eight risk classes to only three risk classes. CONCLUSION: The subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab (breast cancer) and rituximab (hematology) might lower the risk of administration and treatment errors for patients and could hence indirectly have a positive financial impact for hospitals.

Potential resource and cost saving analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration for rituximab in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and for trastuzumab in breast cancer in 17 Italian hospitals based on a systematic survey.

INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous versions of different oncology therapies have been available for patients for a few years, yet patient-relevant and hospital benefits have not been assessed in real life. METHODS: In order to analyze the impact of subcutaneous administrations for rituximab or trastuzumab in comparison to the respective intravenous mode a primary research in Italy was executed. The study's primary objectives were to analyze the resource and cost implications from different perspectives (patient, medical staff) in the real world. The route of administration was discussed and aligned with the participating centers in order to capture all relevant therapy parts. After the successful execution of a pilot study 19 centers in six regions in Italy were recruited to participate. RESULTS: Significant time savings might be achieved with the subcutaneous mode through significantly lower patient preparation time including less time preparing the actual dosing for each individual patient. The total time difference is 3.3 hours with rituximab in hematology (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), which adds up to 23.55 hours for a full course of treatment per patient (overall preparation time: 40.1 hours intravenous [95% confidence interval (CI): ±0.47] vs 16.6 hours subcutaneous [95% CI: ±0.2]). In early breast cancer (trastuzumab), the time saving might be 3.3 hours for the first cycle and the total time saving for patient preparation might be 17.2 hours (overall preparation time: 38.8 hours intravenous [95% CI: ±9.42] vs 21.6 hours subcutaneous [95% CI: ±9.9]). Furthermore, in both settings, the time of medical staff was reduced and could hence be used elsewhere. Finally, in case wastage was experienced with intravenous therapies, there were potential significant reductions in wastage through the subcutaneous administration (93%-100%) with cost savings of €6,057 with rituximab subcutaneous and €28,399 with trastuzumab subcutaneous administration for the full treatment course. CONCLUSION: There are significant resource and cost savings due to subcutaneous administration with rituximab and trastuzumab in Italy based on a systematic survey. With the availability of a subcutaneous use of rituximab and trastuzumab, hospitals, patients and payers in general still have the current standard of care therapies available in the approved indications for a more efficient use of time and resources.