Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Patient with Severe Inhalation Injury: Multidisciplinary Burn Team Care.

INTRODUCTION: Inhalation injury is a major risk factor for mortality in burn patients via 3 primary mechanisms: airway edema and obstruction, hypoxemic respiratory failure, and pneumonia. Currently, the mainstay of treatment is supportive care to include early intubation, lung-protective or high-frequency-percussive mechanical ventilation, nebulized heparin, and aggressive pulmonary toilet. Despite these treatments, a subset of these patients progress to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for which rescue options are limited. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old woman was found down in a house fire. On admission to the burn intensive care unit, she was diagnosed with grade 3 smoke inhalation injury. Cutaneous thermal injury was absent. By hospital day 2, she developed worsening hypoxemia and hypercapnia despite maximal ventilatory support. She was placed on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). She received an average of 2.2 hours of direct rehabilitation a day and completed out-of-bed modalities over 90% of total hospital days. After 159 hours, she was decannulated, and by hospital day 18, she was discharged home on supplemental oxygen. CONCLUSION: Current literature regarding ECMO in inhalation injury is limited, but a growing body of evidence suggests that treatment of severe smoke inhalation injury should include ECMO for those who fail conventional therapy.

Examining the association between military service history and outcomes after burn injury.

INTRODUCTION: The association between military service history and long-term outcomes after burn injury is unknown. This study uses data from the Burn Model System National Database to compare outcomes of individuals with and without self-reported military service history. METHODS: Outcome measures were assessed at 12 months after injury including the Veterans Rand-12 Item Health Survey/Short Form-12, Satisfaction With Life Scale, Patient Reported Outcomes Measure Information System 29, 4-D Itch scale, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Check List - Civilian Version, self-reported Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and employment status. This study included 675 people with burns of whom 108 reported a history of military service. RESULTS: The military service history group was more likely to be older, and male. Those with military service were most likely to be on Medicare insurance and those without military service history were most likely to be on Private Insurance/HMP/PPO. No significant differences were found between those with and without military service history in the outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Further research should examine differences in outcomes between civilians and those with military service history, including elements of resilience and post traumatic growth.

Management of multiple frostbite casualties at a burn center: San Antonio, Texas, 12-20 February 2021.

BACKGROUND: Frostbite is an insidious disease that normally affects people of cold climates. Winter Storm Uri, which occurred from February 12-20, 2021, created unique metrological conditions for Texas. It caused prolonged sub-freezing temperatures and led to rolling blackouts, affecting 2.8 million Texans including 300,000 people in San Antonio. We report 13 frostbite patients admitted to one burn center during this event. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the at-risk population for frostbite, to categorize their injury severity, and to describe their treatment. A secondary aim was to describe the rehabilitation management of these patients. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study. Each patient's injuries were assessed by a topographical grading system. Comparisons were made among those who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), admitted to the progressive care unit (PCU), and treated as outpatients. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were identified. Ten (76.9 %) considered themselves homeless, and 9 (69.2 %) were directly exposed to the elements. The median delay between time of injury and presentation to a medical facility was 3 days (IQR 1-6). Only 3 patients presented to a medical facility within 24 h. Six (46 %) sustained grade 2 injuries, 2 (15 %) sustained grade 3 injuries, and 5 (38%) sustained grade 4 injuries. Only one patient met criteria to receive tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), which was discontinued due to hematochezia. Patients admitted to the ICU, when compared to patients admitted to the ward, had a longer length of stay (median 73 days v. 12 days, p = 0.0215), and required more amputations at below-the-knee or higher levels (3 v. 0, p-value 0.0442). CONCLUSION: In a region unaccustomed and perhaps unprepared to deal with winter storms, the population is particularly vulnerable to frostbite. Lack of awareness of frostbite injuries likely led to the delay in the presentation of patients, which prevented the timely use of tPA. Increasing public awareness may increase readiness.

Critical Care Rehabilitation of the Burn Patient.

Despite the fact that modern burn care has significantly reduced the mortality associated with severe burn injuries, the rehabilitation and community reintegration of survivors continues to be a challenge. An interprofessional team approach is essential for optimal outcomes. This includes early occupational and physical therapy, beginning in the intensive care unit (ICU). Burn-specific techniques (edema management, wound healing, and contracture prevention) are successfully integrated into the burn ICU. Research demonstrates that early intensive rehabilitation of critically ill burn patients is safe and effective. Further work on the physiologic, functional, and long-term impact of this care is needed.

Development of overuse musculoskeletal conditions after combat-related upper limb amputation: a retrospective cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study INTRODUCTION: Service members who have sustained traumatic amputations are typically young and otherwise healthy. Beyond standard care, these individuals desire long, highly active, and relatively pain-free lifestyle, whether that is returning to active duty or transitioning to civilian life. Development of overuse musculoskeletal conditions could have a significant influence on quality of life for Service members with traumatic upper limb amputation. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Compare one-year incidence of overuse musculoskeletal injuries in Service members with different levels of combat-related upper limb amputation to Service members with minor combat-related upper limb injuries. METHODS: Service members with deployment-related upper limb injury (N = 519), 148 major upper limb amputation (55 with amputation at or above elbow, 93 with amputation below elbow) and 371 minor upper limb injury were included in the study. Outcomes of interest clinical diagnosis codes associated with overuse conditions of the upper limb, neck and upper back, lower limb, low back pain, and all regions combined, one year before and one year after injury. RESULTS: Overall, the one-year incidence of developing at least one musculoskeletal overuse condition after upper limb amputation was between 60% and 65%. Service members with upper limb amputations were 2.7 to 4.7 times more likely to develop an overuse upper limb condition, 3.6 to 3.8 times more likely to develop a neck and upper back condition, 2.8 to 4.4 times more likely to develop a lower limb condition, and 3.3 to 3.9 times more likely to develop low back pain as compared those who sustained minor combat-related injuries. No significant differences in the odds of developing a musculoskeletal condition was found between the above elbow and below elbow amputation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of secondary overuse conditions is elevated in Service members with upper limb amputation and warrants focused research efforts toward preventative and rehabilitative interventions.

Psychometric evaluation of the Southampton hand assessment procedure (SHAP) in a sample of upper limb prosthesis users.

BACKGROUND: The 26-item Southampton Hand Assessment Protocol (SHAP) is a test of prosthetic hand function that generates an Index of Functionality (IOF), and prehensile pattern (PP) scores. Prior researchers identified potential issues in SHAP scoring, proposing alternative scoring methods (LIF and W-LIF). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: Evaluate the psychometric properties of the SHAP IOF, LIF, and W-LIF and PP scores and develop the Prosthesis Index of Functionality (P-IOF). METHODS: We examined item completion, floor andceiling effects, concurrent, discriminant, construct and structural validity. The P-IOF used increased boundary limits and information from item completion and completion time. Calibration used a nonlinear mixed model. Scores were estimated using maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation. Mixed integer linear programing (MILP) informed development of a shorter measure. Validity analyses were repeated using the P-IOF. RESULTS: 126 persons, mean age 57 (sd 15.8), 69% with transradial amputation were included. Floors effects were observed in 18.3%-19.1% for the IOF, LIF, and W-LIF. Ten items were not completed by >15% of participants. Boundary limits were problematic for all but 1 item. Correlations with dexterity measures were strong (r =  0.54-0.73). Scores differed by amputation level (p > .0001). Factor analysis did not support use of PP scores. The P-IOF used expanded boundary limits to decrease floor effects. MILP identified 10 items that could be dropped. The 26-item P-IOF and 16-item P-IOF had reduced floor effects (<7.5%), strong evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity, and construct validity. P-IOF reduced administrative burden by 9.5 (sd 5.6) minutes. DISCUSSION: Floor effects limit a measure's ability to distinguish between persons with low function. CONCLUSION: Analyses supported the validity of the SHAP IOF, LIF, and W-LIF, but identified large floor effects, as well as issues with structural validity of the PP scores. The 16-item P-IOF minimizes floor effects and reduces administrative burden.

Burn injuries in US service members: 2001-2018.

INTRODUCTION: Burns are an important cause of battlefield injury, accounting for 5-20% of the combat injury burden. To date, no report has examined the full range of burns, from mild to severe, resulting from post-9/11 conflicts. The present study leverages the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database (EMED), a Navy-maintained health database describing all service member medical encounters occurring during deployment, to capture, quantify and characterize burn-injured service members and the injuries they sustained while deployed in support of post-9/11 operations. METHODS: The EMED was queried for all surviving service members with at least one burn injury, identified using injury-specific Abbreviated Injury Scale codes. Demographic and additional injury information were also obtained from the EMED. RESULTS: From 2001 through 2018, 2507 deployed service members sustained 5551 burns. Blasts accounted for 82% of injuries, largely attributed to the use of improvised explosive devices. Concurrent injury was common, with 30% sustaining a traumatic brain injury and 10% sustaining inhalation injury. Most burns were small, with 92% involving< 20% TBSA; 85% of burns involved< 10% TBSA. The head and the hands were the most commonly affected areas, accounting for 48% of all burns, with 80% of service members sustaining at least one burn to these areas. CONCLUSION: The majority of burns tend to be small in size, with the head and hands most commonly affected. As these areas are often left uncovered by the uniform, prevention measures, particularly improvement in and increased usage of personal protective gear, may help reduce these injuries and their consequences.

Dexterity, activity performance, disability, quality of life, and independence in upper limb Veteran prosthesis users: a normative study.

PURPOSE: To present population data on standardized measures of dexterity, activity performance, disability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and community integration for persons with upper limb amputation (ULA), compare outcomes to normative values, and examine differences by prosthesis type and laterality (unilateral vs. bilateral amputation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-site, cross-sectional design, with in-person evaluations, functional performance, and self-report measures. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed by amputation level and prosthesis type, data were compared for unilateral and bilateral amputation. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven individuals participated; mean age 57 years, 59% percent body-powered prostheses users. All measures of dexterity differed (p < 0.05) by amputation level and by laterality. All measures of activity differed by amputation level with the best scores in transradial (TR) amputation groups. Comparisons of body-powered users with TR amputation found that dexterity was better for those with bilateral compared to unilateral amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Dexterity is markedly impaired in persons with ULA. Individuals with more proximal ULA levels are most impacted. HRQoL and community participation are less impacted and more equivalent to unimpaired persons. Further research is needed to examine differences by terminal device type and determine how best to match persons with ULA to the optimal prosthesis type and componentry, based on individual characteristics.Implications for RehabilitationThis study provides population-based, comparative data on dexterity, activity performance, disability, quality of life, and independence in upper limb prosthesis users.The study provides preliminary analyses comparing the effectiveness of body-powered devices, myoelectric devices with single degree of freedom and multi-degree of freedom terminal devices.The data presented in this study can be used to benchmark outcomes in patients who are upper limb prosthesis users.The data will also be useful to inform comparative evaluations of existing and emerging prosthetic technology.

Understanding Implications of Residual Limb Length, Strength, and Range-of-Motion Impairments of Veterans With Upper Limb Amputation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to describe and quantify the relationship between limb impairment variables to key functional outcomes. DESIGN: This was an observational study of 107 participants with unilateral above/at-elbow or below-elbow/wrist amputation. Demographics, prosthesis characteristics, residual limb length, and prevalence of passive range-of-motion restrictions, and strength impairments were described. Correlations between impairment variables were estimated. Linear regressions examined associations between impairment variables and activity performance, health-related quality of life, disability, and prosthesis satisfaction. RESULTS: Prevalence of short/very short below- and above-elbow residua was 25.7% and 12.5%, respectively. Shorter below-elbow/wrist residual limb length was correlated with elbow flexion weakness (r = 0.30) and prevalence of passive range of motion (r = 0.25). Shoulder prevalence of passive range-of-motion restrictions were correlated with shoulder (r = 0.27-0.51) and elbow weakness (r = 0.25-0.46). In regressions, activity performance was worse for those with shoulder flexion prevalence of passive range-of-motion restrictions (B = -5.0, P = 0.03) and better for those with flexion restrictions (B = 3.3, P = 0.04) compared with normal prevalence of passive range of motion. Prosthetic satisfaction was lower for those with limited elbow prevalence of passive range of motion. CONCLUSIONS: Short below-elbow residual limb length was correlated with impairment of elbow flexion strength and prevalence of passive range of motion. Prevalence of passive range-of-motion restrictions were most prevalent at the shoulder and were strongly correlated with weakness in the same planes of motion. Few significant associations were found between impairment variables and outcomes.

Prosthesis satisfaction and quality of life in US service members with combat-related major lower-limb amputation.

BACKGROUND: Military amputee patient care programs offer extensive services, including advanced prosthetic devices, to restore function and improve quality of life (QOL) among veterans and service members with combat-related limb loss, but research on satisfaction with these devices is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess prosthesis satisfaction and QOL in US service members and veterans with combat-related major lower-limb amputation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Eighty-six participants with combat-related major lower-limb amputation completed the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) Satisfaction with Device scale and Quality of Well-Being Scale, Self-Administered, for the Wounded Warrior Recovery Project. RESULTS: Most participants (62%-88%) responded Agree or Strongly Agree to OPUS Satisfaction with Device items on the fit, weight, comfort, ease of donning, appearance, and durability of their prosthesis. By contrast, the majority of participants (55%-79%) responded Disagree or Strongly Disagree to items on clothes being free of wear and tear, skin free of abrasions and irritations, and the affordability of their prosthesis. In linear regression analysis, total OPUS Satisfaction with Device score was positively associated with Quality of Well-Being Scale, Self-Administered score (ß = 0.0058; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate the majority of participants were satisfied with the overall functionality of their prosthesis, but dissatisfied with the effect of their prosthesis on clothing and skin, as well as expenses related to their prosthesis. Additionally, prosthesis satisfaction was positively associated with QOL.

Upper limb prosthesis users: A longitudinal cohort study.

BACKGROUND: No previous studies have followed prosthesis users with upper limb loss or limb deficiency using their own prostheses to assess change over time. OBJECTIVES: (1) To describe prostheses and terminal device types used at baseline and 1-year follow-up; (2) to examine changes in functional outcomes and device satisfaction over time; and (3) to examine whether changes in outcomes varied across level of amputation and type of prosthesis used. STUDY DESIGN: Multisite, observational time series design with in-person functional performance and self-report data collected at baseline and 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Baseline and follow-up outcome scores were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Analyses were stratified by amputation level, time since amputation, prosthesis type, and change in device type. Published minimal detectable change (MDC) values were used to determine whether detectable change in outcome measures occurred. RESULTS: The longitudinal cohort consisted of 64 participants (mean age 64 years, 56% body-powered users). The only significant differences in outcome measures between baseline and follow-up (after adjustment for false discovery) were hours/day of prosthesis use, which increased from 6.0 (4.4) to 7.3 (5.3) hours (P = 0.0022). Differences in prosthesis use intensity remained significant in analyses stratified by amputation level, time since amputation, prosthesis type, and change in device type. Between 14 and 20% of the sample had change in one or more outcome measures that was greater than the known MDC. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants had stable outcomes over a year's time, whereas 14-20% experienced either improvement or decline in one or more tests indicating the importance of annual follow-up visits.

Design and fabrication of the radial and ulnar wrist articulating control orthoses.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series. INTRODUCTION: Pain and injury at the radial and ulnar aspects of the wrist due to overuse or trauma are commonly treated in hand therapy clinics. PURPOSE OF STUDY: Describe two orthoses that allow targeted rest and recovery of involved anatomical structure(s) while preserving function of surrounding uninvolved structures in patients who have sustained overuse or traumatic injury at the radial or ulnar aspect of the wrist. METHODS: Outline the fabrication of the Ulnar-Wrist Articulating Control Orthosis (U-WACO) and Radial-Wrist Articulating Control Orthosis (R-WACO) as well as presents case examples for each orthosis. RESULTS: The U-WACO and R-WACO designs may improve comfort, compliance, and functional ability to complete daily tasks while allowing targeted rest and recovery of involved anatomical structure(s) at the radial and ulnar aspects of the wrist due to overuse or trauma. CONCLUSION: Dynamic orthoses that allow for movement in one plane while restricting movement in another may overcome the shortcomings of some static orthotic designs.

Safety and Efficacy of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy after Operative Management of Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy is an emerging addition to rehabilitative programs that allows patients to increase strength at lower loads over shorter time periods. Therefore, we conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a rehabilitation program using BFR to a traditional rehabilitation protocol following operative fixation of distal radius fractures. Methods A randomized controlled study was conducted comparing a standardized rehabilitation protocol alone to a combined protocol with the use of BFR therapy in patients treated with volar plate fixation following a displaced distal radius fracture. The same exercises done in the control group were performed by the BFR group with a restrictive tourniquet in place. Patients were followed with serial radiographs to ensure fracture stability. Outcome measures included wrist range of motion, grip strength, pinch strength, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and during activity, patient rated wrist evaluation scores (PRWE), and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores. Results Nine patients were randomized and enrolled within the BFR group ( n = 5) and control ( n = 4) groups. Patients within the BFR group had a significantly greater reduction in pain with activity over the course of the rehabilitation program. Additionally, the BFR group had a significant improvement in PRWE scores during the 8-week rehabilitation program. There was no difference in radiographic measures after initiation of BFR, and all patients tolerated therapy without noted complications. Conclusion BFR therapy is safe and well tolerated after operatively treated distal radius fractures. The addition of BFR therapy can result in quicker reduction in pain with activity and improvement in patient disability when used early following operative management of a distal radius fracture. Level of Evidence This is a Level 1, prognostic study.

Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for persons with unilateral upper extremity amputation: A case report.

STUDY DESIGN: Pretest/posttest case series design. INTRODUCTION: Rates of prosthetic device abandonment are highest among persons with upper extremity (UE) amputation. Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT), which has been extensively studied in patients with chronic, subacute, and acute stroke, is an under-utilized approach to treat persons with UE amputation. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To present an mCIMT intervention for prosthetic device training after a unilateral UE amputation. METHODS: The two cases from an advanced rehabilitation center herein described followed a standard UE amputation rehabilitation program used in conjunction with a home training program using mCIMT 3 hours a day, 5 days a week, for 3 weeks. Progress was evaluated weekly using the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees (AM-ULA); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised. RESULTS: Both the cases exhibited an increase in observable and objective functional use with a UE prosthetic device, as indicated by the AM-ULA. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first description of mCIMT as part of a unilateral UE amputee rehabilitation program. The AM-ULA results show meaningful change, whereas Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised show mixed results.

Occupational Therapy Practice Patterns for Military Service Members With Upper Limb Amputation.

INTRODUCTION: Military Service Members (SMs) with upper limb (UL) amputation have unrestricted access to occupational therapy (OT) services. Identifying OT interventions used based on clinical rationale and patient needs can provide insight toward developing best practice guidelines. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to identify preferred OT practice patterns for U.S. Military SMs treated in Military Treatment Facilities, who have sustained various levels of deployment-related UL amputation. METHODS: The study sample was ascertained from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database housed at the Naval Health Research Center in San Diego, California. SMs with an immediate (within 24 hours of injury) deployment-related unilateral major UL amputation (partial hand and proximal), occurring between January 2001 and December 2014 were identified. SMs with concurrent major lower limb amputation (partial foot and proximal) were excluded. Frequency of OT outpatient visits and units of treatment received were quantified in 3-month increments during the first year after amputation and compared for individuals with above elbow (at or proximal to elbow joint) and below elbow (distal to the elbow joint including partial hand) amputation. This study was approved by the Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: A total of 29,878 encounters occurred during first year after amputation in 148 patients, who had sustained UL loss during the first year after amputation. Active treatments were included in 79.2% of all treatments, followed by manual therapy (13.7%) and modalities (13.5%). A higher number of OT encounters occurred in the above elbow amputation group-the first year of treatment with significantly higher mean number of treatments months 4 to12. A similar pattern in OT encounters was observed in the active therapy category with significantly higher mean number of treatments occurring in above elbow limb loss group in months 10 to 12. CONCLUSION: Findings of the current study suggest SMs with UL amputation utilize OT services often within the first year after injury and those who have sustained amputation proximal to the elbow received more therapy visits than their below elbow counterparts during months 4 to 12. Prosthetic training, therapeutic activities, and therapeutic exercise can be expected to be the highest used active interventions in the first year following UL amputation. Further research is needed to determine details on types and frequency of therapy utilization and recommended therapy strategies.

Blood Flow Restriction Therapy after Closed Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.

Background Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy is an innovative rehabilitative program that enables patients to increase strength at a fraction of the weight typically necessary in endurance exercises. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study evaluating patient outcomes with a BFR therapy program for closed management after a distal radius fracture compared to a traditional rehabilitation protocol. Literature review A randomized-controlled study was conducted comparing a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol alone to a combined protocol with the use of BFR therapy in patients who were initially treated with closed reduction and short arm cast immobilization for a displaced distal radius fracture between May 1, 2015 and August 1, 2016. BFR therapy was performed with a restrictive tourniquet applied to the upper brachium, performing the same strengthening exercises as the control group but with the restrictive tourniquet in place. Clinical assessment was conducted at 6, 10, and 14 weeks from the date of initial cast immobilization. Outcome measures collected included wrist range of motion; grip strength; pinch strength; visual analogue scale for pain with activity and at rest; patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) scores; and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled and randomized between the BFR ( n = 6) and control ( n = 7) groups. The BFR group noted significantly greater reduction in pain with activity compared to the control group after 8 weeks of therapy (Δ -4.0 vs. -2.3, p = 0.03). Similarly, patients in the BFR group displayed greater reduction in PRWE scores compared to the control group after 8 weeks of BFR therapy (Δ -57.9 vs. 30.8, p = 0.01). The two groups did not demonstrate any significant difference in radiographic outcomes at any time point or throughout the course of the study. All patients tolerated the BFR therapy program and there were no complications. Clinical relevance The addition of BFR therapy to the rehabilitative program after closed management of a distal radius fracture is safe, well tolerated by patients, without any deleterious effects on radiographic outcomes. This pilot study noted that BFR therapy in patients with nonoperative distal radius fractures may result in a larger reduction in pain with activity and greater improvement in overall self-perceived function.

Impact of Fire Arms Training in a Virtual Reality Environment on Occupational Performance (Marksmanship) in a Polytrauma Population.

INTRODUCTION: Polytrauma, to include major limb amputation, in a military population presents unique rehabilitation challenges with the overarching goal of restoring function leading to the primary question, "Is this Service Member (SM) capable of returning to duty following rehabilitation?" The US military has a vested interest in maximizing injured SMs occupational performance to allow for return to duty. The purpose of this report is to describe marksmanship (shot grouping and weapon qualification) and return to duty outcomes following a course of VRE-based firearm training in a polytrauma patient population. METHODS: The medical records, stored in the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA), of all patients who received rehabilitative care at the Center for the Intrepid (CFI) to include VRE-based firearms training between 01OCT2015 and 01AUG2016 were manually reviewed for inclusion. Subjects included all adult (18 years and older) SMs (active duty at time of admission) with a diagnosis of polytrauma who had been referred to and treated (received additional services such as physical and or occupational therapy) at the CFI. Approval for this research was received from the Brooke Army Medical Center Department of Clinical Investigation Office of the Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Medical records of 30 SMs with a polytrauma diagnosis met the inclusion criteria. Mean shot group sizes for the M9 and M4 weapon decreased between initial and post training time points for the M9 zero (p = 0.009) and M4 zero (p = 0.020). There was no significant difference between initial and post training time points at the other shooting distances with either weapon. There was an 89% qualification rate for both the M9 (n = 18) and M4 (n = 19) weapons for those who attempted qualification; 43% of the population (n = 13) did not attempt qualification with either weapon. CONCLUSION: SMs with polytrauma demonstrated a high rate of weapon qualification (accuracy) following VRE-based firearm training. Shot group size (precision) at short distances with a M9 pistol and M4 rifle also improved with training. While overall marksmanship appeared to improve, high return to duty rates were not directly related to firearm training or marksmanship. Future efforts need to focus on consistent clinical documentation of firearm training procedure and the establishment of psychometric properties for marksmanship outcome measures.

Psychosocial reactions to upper extremity limb salvage: A case series.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series. INTRODUCTION: A salvaged limb is one that has undergone a major traumatic injury, followed by repeated surgical attempts in order to avoid amputation. Psychological recovery for individuals with lower extremity limb salvage has been examined in a number of studies. However, psychosocial reactions for individuals with upper extremity (UE) limb salvage are understudied in the literature. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to explore the process of psychosocial adaptation for 3 trauma cases after UE limb salvage. METHODS: The Reactions to Impairment and Disability Inventory was used to assess psychosocial adaptation. Physical function outcomes (pain, range of motion, edema, sensation, and dexterity) are presented. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand measure was used to assess perceived disability. Medical and rehabilitation history are discussed for each case, in order to provide in-depth understanding of the impact of these injuries. RESULTS: Reactions to injury varied across the cases; however, outcomes suggest that psychosocial adaptation may be influenced by the experience of pain, the ability to participate in valued roles and activities, and having a supportive social network. DISCUSSION: For this population, therapists may consider emphasizing pain management, focusing on client-centered goals and interventions, and facilitating peer support. Providers should closely monitor patients for signs of poor adaptation, such as hand-hiding behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: This study is among the first to examine psychological outcomes for the UE limb salvage population. Future research would be beneficial to provide deeper understanding of the psychosocial challenges for these individuals.

Upper Extremity Amputation and Prosthetics Care Across the Active Duty Military and Veteran Populations.

The hand and arm are exceptionally dexterous, exquisitely sensitive, and proficient in performing tasks and functions. Given the invaluable functions of the upper extremity in daily life, replacement of a missing limb through prosthetic substitution is challenging. Prosthetic and rehabilitation needs of injured Service members from recent military conflicts have brought upper extremity amputation to the forefront, which has led to an increase in attention and resource allocation. This article provides an overview of the care of the upper extremity amputee including surgical considerations, prosthetic design and fitting, and preprosthetic and post-prosthetic rehabilitation considerations.