ABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the characteristics of bioceramic endodontic sealer Endosequence BC sealer with those of AH Plus sealer. METHODOLOGY: Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were analysed on human gingival fibroblasts submitted to cell culture medium conditioned by sealers using the MTT reduction assay and micronucleus formation test (MNT), respectively. Cells grown on fresh medium served as controls. Cell viabilities were measured at 1, 3, 5 and 7 days. The antibacterial activity was analysed on an Enterococcus faecalis strain (ATCC 29212) using both on agar diffusion test (ADT) and a direct contact test (DCT). The inhibition zones in ADT were measured after 48 h and the colony-forming units counting in the DCT after 1, 24, 72 and 168 h. Data were compared by anova and Tukey's test and MNT by Fisher's exact test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Cultures submitted to Endosequence BC sealer had a significantly higher number of viable cells (P < 0.01) and less micronucleus formation (P < 0.05) than AH Plus sealer. Endosequence BC sealer exhibited significantly smaller inhibition zones (6.00 ± 0.03 mm) than AH Plus sealer (10.31 ± 0.21 mm) (P < 0.05). Moreover, Endosequence BC sealer had significantly smaller antibacterial activity than AH Plus sealer up to 1 h of direct contact (P < 0.05). On other exposure times, both materials had similar antibacterial effectiveness (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Bioceramic-based sealer had less cytotoxicity and genotoxicity and similar antibacterial effect against E. faecalis in comparison with AH Plus sealer.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To assess the ex vivo effectiveness of the alternated use of 1% NaOCl and 15% citric acid in association with two instrumentation techniques for the disinfection of root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. METHODOLOGY: Eighty human mandibular premolars with straight, oval root canals standardized to 15 mm in length were infected with a mixed culture of E. faecalis and C. albicans for 28 days. Five other teeth were used as controls and were neither contaminated nor instrumented. Specimens were divided into two groups (n = 40), according to whether the canal preparation technique used manual (K-type) or rotary (Protaper Universal) instruments. These groups were further divided into four subgroups (n = 10) according to the irrigation solution used: saline, 1% NaOCl, 1% NaOCl with alternated use of 15% citric acid and 5.25% NaOCl. Root canals were prepared with a crown-down technique until a size 50 K-file or with rotary preparation until an F5 instrument. Microbiological sampling was performed before (S1) and after (S2) the chemomechanical preparation, using sterile paper points. The specimens were split, and 0.02 g of dentine chips was collected from the root thirds to verify the presence of microorganisms in root canal walls. RESULTS: Saline and 1% NaOCl were less effective in reducing microorganisms compared with 1% NaOCl with alternated use of 15% citric acid or 5.25% NaOCl alone (P < 0.05). Both manual and rotary preparations significantly reduced microorganisms regardless of the irrigation solution used (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the canal preparation techniques (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Irrigation with 5.25% NaOCl and 1% NaOCl alternated with 15% citric acid reduced microorganisms in infected root canals significantly more than saline and 1% NaOCl.
