ABSTRACT
METHODS: We present a series of three patients with large hepatocellular adenoma lesions showing a central location, for which the living donor liver transplantation strategy was used as a backup procedure. RESULTS: Hepatocellular adenoma was confirmed by biopsy in all patients. Surgical resection was indicated because of the patients' symptoms and lesion size and growth. All patients had a lesion that was central or in close contact with major vessels. The final decision to proceed with the resection was made intraoperatively. A live donor was prepared for all three patients. Two patients underwent portal vein embolization associated with extended hepatectomy, and a total hepatectomy plus liver transplantation with a living donor was performed in one patient. All patients had good postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of hepatocellular adenomas for which complex resections are necessary and resectability can only be confirmed intraoperatively, surgical safety can be improved through the use of a living donor backup. Center expertise with living donor liver transplantation is paramount for the success of this approach.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Biliary complications (BCs) remain an important cause of morbidity after pediatric liver transplantation. Technical factors have already been implicated in the development of BCs. Previous reports have associated the use of partial grafts, particularly living donor grafts, with a higher incidence of BCs. Our aim is to study the factors associated with the development of BCs in a large cohort of pediatric liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 670 children (<18 years of age) who underwent a primary liver transplant between March 2000 and January 2015. Patients who did and did not develop BCs were compared with identify associated factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients (17.2%) developed BCs (83 strictures and 44 leaks). Of the study participants, 594 had living donor liver transplants. Multiple arterial anastomoses was a protective factor for BCs, and a ductoplasty was a risk factor. Living donor grafts and multiple biliary anastomoses were more frequently associated with leaks. Patients with BCs had a higher reoperation rate and longer hospital stays. There was no difference in patient or graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Technical factors play a major role in the development of BCs, particularly leaks. Strictures are more frequently associated with an inadequate arterial supply to the bile duct, and multiple arterial anastomoses may protect children from this complication. The use of partial grafts was not an independent factor for BCs in high-volume centers that are experienced with this technique.
