Osteoarthritis: an overview of the disease and its treatment strategies.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is currently defined by the American College of Rheumatology as a "heterogeneous group of conditions that leads to joint symptoms and signs which are associated with defective integrity of articular cartilage, in addition to related changes in the underlying bone at the joint margins." Its prevalence after the age of 65 years is about 60% in men and 70% in women. The etiology of OA is multifactorial, with inflammatory, metabolic, and mechanical causes. A number of environmental risk factors, such as obesity, occupation, and trauma, may initiate various pathological pathways. OA indicates the degeneration of articular cartilage together with changes in subchondral bone and mild intraarticular inflammation. The principal treatment objectives are to control pain adequately, improve function, and reduce disability. Acetaminophen is frequently used for symptomatic OA with mild to moderate pain. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are more effective in the case of moderate-severe pain, but they have an increased risk of serious upper gastrointestinal adverse events. The newer cyclooxygenase COX-2 specific inhibitors (Coxibs) are as efficacious as traditional NSAIDs and have a better gastrointestinal safety profile. Other compounds (eg, chondroitin sulfate, diacerein, glucosamine sulfate) have a symptomatic effect that is slower and less than that of NSAIDs. The structure-modifying effects of drugs are currently being evaluated, and both glucosamine sulfate and diacerein have been shown in some trials to have a beneficial structural effect. Nonpharmacological interventions are frequently and widely used in the management of OA patients, but there is little evidence that they are effective: the best studied and most successful nonpharmacological interventions are patient education, self-management, and exercise. There is some evidence for the pain-relieving efficacy of thermotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) but not of electrotherapy, acupuncture, homeopathy, or manual therapy. The value of interventions aimed at improving function and maximizing independence (occupational therapy, walking aids, workplace adaptation) is also unclear. The disease course and patient's requirements often change over time, thus requiring a periodic review and readjustment of therapy rather than the rigid continuation of a single treatment.

Analysis of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic prescription patterns of general practitioners and specialists in the AMICA study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prescription modalities of general practitioners (GPs) and specialists in symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) patients enrolled in the AMICA study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study started in 2001 as a cohort investigation of OA patients seen by 2764 GPs and 316 specialists. Enrolled were 28,981 patients with symptomatic OA of the hand, hip, or knee. RESULTS: GPs and physical medicine specialists treated OA less frequently with pharmacological therapy than rheumatologists (OR 0.35; CI 0.26 to 0.47) or orthopedic surgeons (OR 0.65; CI 0.54 to 0.77). Pharmacological therapies (alone or in association with nonpharmacological modalities) were selected by 97% of the GPs, 96% of the rheumatologists, 94% of the orthopedic surgeons, and 85% of the physical medicine specialists. In comparison with GPs, all of the specialists more frequently used disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs) (rheumatologists: OR 6.86, CI 6.03 to 7.80; orthopedic surgeons: OR 2.20, CI 1.94 to 2.49; physical medicine specialists: OR 2.11, CI 1.69 to 2.63). Nonpharmacological therapies were selected by 44% of the GPs, 54% of the rheumatologists, 71% of the orthopedic surgeons, and 90% of the physical medicine specialists. They were used alone uncommonly (by 3% of the GPs, 3% of the rheumatologists, 6% of the orthopedic surgeons, and 15% of the physical medicine specialists). GPs use nonpharmacological treatment less than specialists: OR 0.53; CI 0.47 to 0.60 versus rheumatologists; OR 0.20; CI 0.18 to 0.21 versus orthopedic surgeons; and OR 0.07; CI 0.05 to 0.09 versus physical medicine specialists. Ultrasound (US) (11%) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) (7%) were the nonpharmacological therapies most frequently prescribed by GPs. Among the specialists, physical medicine specialists most frequently prescribed US (35%) and TENS (21%); US was also preferred by rheumatologists, whereas the orthopedic surgeon's choice was magnetotherapy (21%). Exercises and other passive or active rehabilitation strategies were prescribed for only 13% of the patients seen by GPs, but all 3 categories of specialists prescribed exercises and manual techniques far more frequently: rheumatologists, OR 1.63: 1.40 to 1.63; orthopedic surgeons, OR 1.67: 1.48 to 1.88; physical medicine specialists, OR 3.19: 2.66 to 3.82. CONCLUSIONS: Italian rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons are the specialists who most frequently use pharmacological treatment for OA. Nonpharmacological treatment is used commonly among both GPs and specialists but rarely as single therapy. Exercise and passive or active rehabilitation strategies are not frequently prescribed, although they are recommended by all the published guidelines.

Effect of low dose methotrexate on bone density in women with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicenter cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of low dose methotrexate (MTX) on bone using data from a large multicenter, cross-sectional study on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We selected 731 female patients with RA divided into 2 groups on the basis of MTX use: never MTX users (n = 485) and MTX users for at least 6 months (n = 246). Demographic, disease, and treatment related variables were collected for each patient. BMD was measured at lumbar spine and proximal femur by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis was defined as BMD < -2.5 T-score. RESULTS: The frequency of osteoporosis among never MTX users and MTX users was 29.1% and 28.3% (p = NS) for lumbar spine, and 34.8% and 37.8% (p = NS) for femoral neck, respectively. Mean T-score values at lumbar spine and femoral neck were comparable in the 2 groups, even after adjusting for age, menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, and steroid use. The generalized linear model showed that age, menopause, BMI, HAQ score, and steroid use were significant independent predictors of BMD at lumbar or at femoral level, whereas MTX use was not. Logistic procedure showed that only age, HAQ score, and BMI were significantly associated with the risk of osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: We found no negative effect of low dose MTX on BMD in women with RA.

Predictive variables for malignant transformation in 452 patients with asymptomatic IgM monoclonal gammopathy.

The natural history of asymptomatic IgM monoclonal gammopathies (MG) and variables predicting evolution to symptomatic lymphoproliferative disorders were investigated in 452 patients diagnosed from 1975 to 2001. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to identify possible predictors of disease progression. At a median follow-up of 49 months (range, 12 to 233), 41 cases (9.1%) evolved to symptomatic Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (n = 36), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 2), B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 1), IgM multiple myeloma (n = 1), and primary amyloidosis (n = 1); the median interval from diagnosis was 53 months (range, 12 to 154). The cumulative probabilities of transformation into a symptomatic lymphoproliferative disease at 5 and 10 years were 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6% to 12%) and 21% (95% CI, 16% to 29%), respectively. At univariate analysis, monoclonal component size and hemoglobin level as continuous parameters, lymphocytosis (>4 x 10(9)/L), bone marrow lymphoplasmacytoid infiltration (>10%), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (>40 mm/h), and detectable Bence Jones proteinuria were significantly related with evolution probability. At multivariate analysis, paraprotein level (P <.0001), hemoglobin level (P <.05), and lymphocytosis (P <.0001) independently predicted malignant evolution (P <.0001). In conclusion, patients with asymptomatic IgM-MG showing hematological features predictive of progression should be carefully monitored in view of an early treatment of the disease.