ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A specific, occupation-related susceptibility of professional singers to experience gastroesophageal reflux was hypothesized. We investigated the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in a series of professional opera choristers in comparison with a general population sample. METHODS: A total of 351 professional opera choristers from well-known chorus in different Italian regions were identified and a sample of 578 subjects residing in the same areas with a similar distribution in age and sex was selected. Reflux symptoms in the year preceding the survey together with selected individual characteristics and lifestyle habits were investigated in both study groups through a structured questionnaire. Prevalence rate ratios, adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and other confounding factors, were computed. RESULTS: Opera choristers reported a statistically significant higher prevalence of heartburn, regurgitation, cough, and hoarse voice than the population sample, with adjusted prevalent rate ratios of 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-1.94), 1.81 (95% CI, 1.42-2.30), 1.40 (95% CI, 1.18-1.67), and 2.45 (95% CI, 1.97-3.04), respectively. Regurgitation appeared to be associated consistently with the cumulative lifetime duration of singing activity (P = .04) and with the weekly duration of singing activity (P = .005) when different multivariate models were applied. CONCLUSIONS: Opera choristers reported a higher prevalence of reflux symptoms than the population sample. Future studies will be needed to clarify whether gastroesophageal reflux in professional opera choristers is stress-induced and therefore may be considered as a work-related disease.
Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Music , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Cough/epidemiology , Diaphragm/physiopathology , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Heartburn/epidemiology , Hoarseness/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time FactorsABSTRACT
GOALS: To compare high-dose versus low-dose clarithromycin in 1-week triple therapy including rabeprazole and levofloxacin. BACKGROUND: Regimens containing rabeprazole and levofloxacin have proved to be effective against H. pylori infection. STUDY: One-hundred H. pylori-positive patients were randomly assigned to one of the following 1-week regimens: rabeprazole 20 mg o.d. plus levofloxacin 500 mg o.d. and clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (RLC-1 group); rabeprazole 20 mg o.d. plus levofloxacin 500 mg o.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (RLC-2 group). H. pylori status was assessed at entry and after the treatment. Patients who experienced treatment failure underwent antibiotic susceptibility testing. RESULTS: Forty-two patients in RLC-1 group (both PP and ITT analysis: 84%; 95%CI: 71-93%) and 47 in RLC2 group (both PP and ITT analysis: 94%; 95% CI: 83-98%) became H. pylori negative. Clarithromycin resistance was detected in all of 8 (100%) RLC-1 failures and in 1 out of 3 (33%) RLC-2 failures. Side effects occurred in 8% of patients in RLC-1 group and in 12% in RLC-2. CONCLUSIONS: Regimens tested are competitive with other PPI-based treatments. One-week triple therapy containing rabeprazole plus, levofloxacin, and high-dose clarithromycin yielded a higher eradicating rate than the one containing low-dose clarithromycin and may be considered as a first-line therapy option.
