Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data Throughout the Total Product Life Cycle of Medical Devices.

Nearly ubiquitous use of personal electronics, wearable sensors, and other types of digital health technologies, along with wireless connectivity, makes the capture of health data directly from an individual easier, enabling the use of patient-generated health data (PGHD) as a potential bridge between a patient's home and the healthcare system. This type of real-world data may be a completely new type of information, or it may be a more frequent collection of traditional information over longer time periods to form a longitudinal view of a patient's health status that can inform decision-making in clinical, medical product regulatory, and coverage and reimbursement settings. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) has been exploring and advancing the collection and use of PGHD since 2016, hosting a public meeting on the topic in May 2021. This manuscript presents highlights from various discussions at this meeting including those on the importance of stakeholder engagement, characteristics of high data quality, and PGHD in practice in patient-driven registries, as well as a look forward to some of the opportunities in the field.

Evaluation of cardiovascular implantable electronic device leads post implant: ElectroPhysiology Predictable And SuStainable Implementation Of National Registries (EP PASSION).

Post-market evaluation is important to ensure the ongoing safety and effectiveness of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) leads. The Twenty-First Century Cures Act and subsequent Food and Drug Administrative (FDA) Guidance provide an opportunity to leverage real-world data sources for this purpose. The past 4 years have seen the development of EP PASSION: a multi-stakeholder, collaborative effort between the FDA, CIED manufacturers, Heart Rhythm Society, and academics. Using real-world data, EP PASSION enables longitudinal evaluation of the long-term safety of CIED leads, addressing limitations of current approaches to generate evidence that informs regulatory, clinical, and manufacturer decision-making. This state of the art article describes the impetus for and launch of EP PASSION, the lessons learned, its current state, the current analytic approach, and the strengths and limitations of leveraging extant data sources for post-market lead evaluation. We also compare EP PASSION to traditional post-approval studies and describe possible future directions.

Claims-based cardiovascular outcome identification for clinical research: Results from 7 large randomized cardiovascular clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Medicare insurance claims may provide an efficient means to ascertain follow-up of older participants in clinical research. We sought to determine the accuracy and completeness of claims- versus site-based follow-up with clinical event committee (+CEC) adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using linked Medicare and Duke Database of Clinical Trials data. Medicare claims were linked to clinical data from 7 randomized cardiovascular clinical trials. Of 52,476 trial participants, linking resulted in 5,839 (of 10,497 linkage-eligible) Medicare-linked trial participants with fee-for-service A and B coverage. Death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and revascularization incidences were compared using Medicare inpatient claims only, site-reported events (+CEC) only, or a combination of the 2. Randomized treatment effects were compared as a function of whether claims-based, site-based (+CEC), or a combined system was used for event detection. RESULTS: Among the 5,839 study participants, the annual event rates were similar between claims- and site-based (+CEC) follow-up: death (overall rate 5.2% vs 5.2%; adjusted κ 0.99), MI (2.2% vs 2.3%; adjusted κ 0.96), stroke (0.7% vs 0.7%; adjusted κ 0.99), and any revascularization (7.4% vs 7.9%; adjusted κ 0.95). Of events detected by claims yet not reported by CEC, a minority were reported by sites but negatively adjudicated by CEC (39% of MIs and 18% of strokes). Differences in individual case concordance led to higher event rates when claims- and site-based (+CEC) systems were combined. Randomized treatment effects were similar among the 3 approaches for each outcome of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Claims- versus site-based (+CEC) follow-up identified similar overall cardiovascular event rates despite meaningful differences in the events detected. Randomized treatment effects were similar using the 2 methods, suggesting claims data could be used to support clinical research leveraging routinely collected data. This approach may lead to more effective evidence generation, synthesis, and appraisal of medical products and inform the strategic approaches toward the National Evaluation System for Health Technology.

Trends and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in a Community Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the trend in growth of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) performed in the United States with analysis of rates and predictors of major adverse events. BACKGROUND: Sustained VT is a significant cause of sudden death, heart failure (HF), and recurrent shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients. Catheter ablation for VT reduces arrhythmia recurrence. Limited data are available regarding the use, safety, and long-term outcomes after VT ablation. METHODS: Using the U.S. Medicare database linked to the Social Security Death Index, we examined the annual use of VT ablation in 21,073 patients over 12 years, with 30-day risk of mortality, nonfatal major adverse events (MAEs), 1-year risk of mortality, re-hospitalization, repeat ablation, and factors associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Among 21,073 patients (age 70 ± 9 years; 77% men; 90% white), there were 1,581 (7.5%) non-fatal MAEs within 30 days. There were 963 (4.6%) vascular complications, 485 (2.3%) pericardial complications, and 201 (1%) strokes and/or transient ischemic attacks. Mechanical circulatory support use was infrequent (2.3%). The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 4.2% and 15.0%, respectively. The 1-year incidence of repeat ablation was 10.2 per 100 person-years and re-hospitalization for HF or VT was 15.4 per 100 person-years and 18 per 100 person-years, respectively. Patients with an ICD had increased 30-day (4.9% vs. 0.86%) and 1-year mortality (17.5% vs. 2.54% [22.9 per 100 person-years vs. 3.1 per 100 person-years]; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.21 to 3.88). Rates of hospitalization for HF (18 per 100 person-years vs. 1.8 per 100 person-years; HR: 4.00; 95% CI: 2.78 to 5.78) or VT recurrence (22.7 per 100 person-years vs. 2.1 per 100 person-years; HR: 5.70; 95% CI: 4.09 to 7.96) were also higher at 1 year. Between 2000 and 2012, annual VT ablation volumes increased >4-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation for VT is frequently performed. Short-term MAEs and 1-year mortality is significant and is highest in patients with an ICD. These findings may provide greater insight of outcomes in an unselected real-world population undergoing VT ablation.

Sex-Specific Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: FDA Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Premarket Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a less invasive alternative approach to surgery. Individual randomized clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of TAVR were mostly underpowered for conducting separate analyses for women and men. We pooled data from premarket TAVR clinical trials comparing short (30 days)- and long-term (∼2 years) outcomes by sex. METHODS: Patient-level data from the TAVR arms of six clinical trials were pooled (2515 patients). Random-effects models for time-to-event outcomes (odds ratios [ORs] for 30-day outcomes and hazard ratios [HRs] for complete follow-up for mortality, ischemic stroke, kidney injury, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, and device migration) and dichotomous outcomes (ORs for reintervention, rehospitalization, and pacemaker implantation) were then fit to directly compare outcomes between women and men. RESULTS: Overall, the pattern of individual comorbidities was more severe in men. There was no difference in mortality risk at 30 days (female-to-male OR = 1.00 [0.69-1.46]); however, at follow-up completion (∼2 years post-TAVR), women had a 24% lower mortality risk than men (HR = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.65-0.89]). Women also had a 30% lower risk of kidney injury at 30 days (OR = 0.70 [0.49-0.98]), which increased to 33% over the complete follow-up period (HR = 0.67 [0.51-0.87]). Major bleeding was more common in women compared to men at both 30 days (OR = 1.44 [1.19-1.76]) and long-term follow-up (HR = 1.22 [1.04-1.43]). For dichotomous outcomes, women had a 68% lower risk for reinterventions (OR = 0.32 [0.18-0.58]). We did not observe any difference in the risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, device migration, rehospitalizations, or pacemaker implantations between sexes. CONCLUSIONS: This patient-level data meta-analysis of six premarket clinical trials found that women who received TAVR had fewer comorbidities at baseline. Acute outcomes (30 day) with respect to mortality were similar. Women were observed to have a lower risk of kidney injury, but higher risk of major bleeding compared to men receiving TAVR at 30 days. At complete follow-up, statistically significant advantages for women emerged in improved survival and lower reintervention risk. No differences in ischemic stroke, pacemaker implantation, or rehospitalization were observed. That women are healthier at baseline and develop fewer postprocedural complications than men may explain their higher survival.

Improving Heart Failure Therapeutics Development in the United States: The Heart Failure Collaboratory.

The current heart failure clinical trial environment is strained by increasing complexity and cost, regulatory requirements, competing demands on stakeholders, implementation challenges, and decreasing patient and investigator participation. To begin the process of developing potentially effective strategies and tactics, stakeholders including patients; investigators; academic leaders; pharmaceutical and device industry representatives; society representatives; third-party payers; and government representatives from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services convened in March of 2017. This paper summarizes the discussions, outlines current challenges and actionable opportunities, and makes targeted recommendations to achieve the goals of improving efficiency in clinical trials and speeding the development of effective heart failure therapies, including the formation of an organized Heart Failure Collaboratory.

Sex-Specific Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of the Literature.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a safe and effective therapy for aortic valve replacement in patients ineligible for or at high risk for surgery. However, outcomes after TAVR based on an individual's sex remain to be fully elucidated. We searched PUBMED and EMBASE using the keywords: "transcatheter aortic valve replacement," "transcatheter aortic valve implantation," "sex differences," "gender," "sex characteristics" and collected information on baseline features, procedural characteristics, and postprocedural outcomes in women. Inclusion/exclusion resulted in 23 publications. Women had less preexisting comorbidities than men. Most studies reported better survival in women (range of hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.27 [0.09-0.84] to 0.91 [0.75-1.10]). At 30 days, women also had more vascular complications (6-20% vs 2-14%) and higher bleeding rates (10-44% vs 8-25%). Stroke rates were similar at 30 days (women, 1-7%; men, 1-5%). This literature review showed better survival in women than men after TAVR. However, women had more vascular complications and bleeding; stroke rates were similar. These findings may partly be explained by fewer baseline comorbidities in women. These results should be interpreted with caution as most measures only include unadjusted percentages.

Use of endpoint adjudication to improve the quality and validity of endpoint assessment for medical device development and post marketing evaluation: Rationale and best practices. A report from the cardiac safety research consortium.

This white paper provides a summary of presentations, discussions and conclusions of a Thinktank entitled "The Role of Endpoint Adjudication in Medical Device Clinical Trials". The think tank was cosponsored by the Cardiac Safety Research Committee, MDEpiNet and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and was convened at the FDA's White Oak headquarters on March 11, 2016. Attention was focused on tailoring best practices for evaluation of endpoints in medical device clinical trials, practical issues in endpoint adjudication of therapeutic, diagnostic, biomarker and drug-device combinations, and the role of adjudication in regulatory and reimbursement issues throughout the device lifecycle. Attendees included representatives from medical device companies, the FDA, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), end point adjudication specialist groups, clinical research organizations, and active, academically based adjudicators. The manuscript presents recommendations from the think tank regarding (1) rationale for when adjudication is appropriate, (2) best practices establishment and operation of a medical device adjudication committee and (3) the role of endpoint adjudication for post market evaluation in the emerging era of real world evidence.

Improving the Safety and Effectiveness of Medical Device Therapy in Women.

When not enough women are included in many clinical trials, an information gap on medical device safety and effectiveness exists, which can make it difficult to detect sex-specific results. In this article we discuss potential reasons for the underrepresentation of women and the regulatory research conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) used in supporting regulatory decisions. We demonstrate that important differences in cardiovascular device performance between women and men exist. Furthermore, concrete steps are outlined on the possible ways these sex-specific results can be detected and how a recent FDA Action Plan and Guidance Document aim at encouraging female participation in clinical trials and the appropriate analysis thereof.

Toward Sex-Specific Guidelines for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?

An important treatment for patients with heart failure is cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Even though only 20% of women were included in clinical trials for CRT, a benefit has been shown in recent studies for subgroups of women compared to their male counterparts. Given this low inclusion rate of women in clinical studies, professional society guideline-based CRT recommendations, such as those by the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF)/American Heart Association (AHA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), may not truly represent the best treatment for women, especially since most of the reports that showed this greater benefit in women were published after the latest guidelines. Despite having research and multiple publications regarding sex-specific heart failure outcomes and response to CRT, the ACCF/AHA/HRS guidelines have not yet been updated to account for the recent information regarding the differences in benefit for women and men with similar patient characteristics. This review discusses the physiology behind CRT, sex-specific characteristics of heart failure, and cardiac electrophysiology and summarizes the current sex-specific literature to encourage consideration of CRT guidelines for women and men separately.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Silzone Era St. Jude Medical Mechanical Heart Valves.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Since the voluntary recall of St. Jude Medical (SJM) Silzone impregnated heart valves, no large-scale study has examined their long-term outcomes. METHODS: Using Medicare-linked records from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (1993-2004), the clinical outcomes were evaluated through eight years among those patients who received SJM mechanical heart valves during the Silzone era (March 1998 to December 1999; n = 3,775), relative to those in both the pre-Silzone era (January 1993 to February 1998; n = 13,570) and the post-Silzone era (January 2000 to December 2004; n = 6,882). An inverse probability weighting was used to balance the observed differences in case mix. RESULTS: During the Silzone era, 79% of all implanted mechanical heart valves were manufactured by SJM. By eight years post-implantation, the most common adverse events in this Medicare-linked cohort (median age 71 years) were death (43.5%) and thromboembolism (14.7%), while valve reoperation (1.7%) and endocarditis (1.4%) were less common. Patients treated during the Silzone era experienced a lower associated risk of mortality to eight years than those in both the pre-Silzone era (adjusted hazards ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-0.98) and post-Silzone era (adjusted HR 0.92, CI 0.67-0.98), while the adjusted eight-year risks of reoperation, thromboembolism and endocarditis were similar across the three eras for the overall cohort and among both aortic valve and mitral valve patients. CONCLUSION: Medicare patients who received SJM mechanical heart valves during the Silzone era experienced similar clinical outcomes as those treated before or after the Silzone era. These data do not substantiate continued public health concerns associated with Silzone era valve prostheses among older individuals.

Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators Versus Standard Implantable Defibrillators in Medicare Patients.

Previous analyses have shown that there is lower mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) but demonstrated mixed results in patients without LBBB. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of CRT-D versus standard implantable defibrillators (ICDs) separately in patients with LBBB and right bundle branch block (RBBB) using Medicare claims data. Medicare records from CRT-D and ICD recipients from 2002 to 2009 that were followed up for up to 48 months were analyzed. We used propensity scores to match patients with ICD to those with CRT-D. In LBBB, 1:1 matching with replacement resulted in 54,218 patients with CRT-D and 20,763 with ICD, and in RBBB, 1:1 matching resulted in 7,298 patients with CRT-D and 7,298 with ICD. In LBBB, CRT-D had a 12% lower risk of heart failure hospitalization or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 0.90) and 5% lower death risk (HR 0.95, 0.92 to 0.97) compared with ICD. In RBBB, CRT-D had a 15% higher risk of heart failure hospitalization or death (HR 1.15, 1.10 to 1.20) and 13% higher death risk (HR 1.13, 1.07 to 1.18). Sensitivity analysis revealed that accounting for covariates not captured in the Medicare database may lead to increased benefit with CRT-D in LBBB and no difference in RBBB. In conclusion, in a large Medicare population, CRT-D was associated with lower mortality in LBBB but higher mortality in RBBB. The absence of certain covariates, in particular those that determine treatment selection, may affect the results of comparative effectiveness studies using claims data.

Sex differences in device therapy for heart failure: utilization, outcomes, and adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies of heart failure patients demonstrated significant improvement in exercise capacity, quality of life, cardiac left ventricular function, and survival from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but the underenrollment of women in these studies is notable. Etiological and pathophysiological differences may result in different outcomes in response to this treatment by sex. The observed disproportionate representation of women suggests that many women with heart failure either do not meet current clinical criteria to receive CRT in trials or are not properly recruited and maintained in these studies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review through May 2014 of clinical trials and registries of CRT use that stratified outcomes by sex or reported percent women included. One-hundred eighty-three studies contained sex-specific information. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the studies evaluated included ≤ 35% women. Fifty-six articles included effectiveness data that reported response with regard to specific outcome parameters. When compared with men, women exhibited more dramatic improvement in specific parameters. In the studies reporting hazard ratios for hospitalization or death, women generally had greater benefit from CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Our review confirms women are markedly underrepresented in CRT trials, and when a CRT device is implanted, women have a therapeutic response that is equivalent to or better than in men, while there is no difference in adverse events reported by sex.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

BACKGROUND: Women have been under-represented in trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-D). Previous studies suggest that women benefit from CRT-D at shorter QRS duration than men and that there may be no benefit of CRT-D in patients without left bundle branch block (LBBB) regardless of patient sex. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared sex-specific death risk in 75 079 patients with New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and prolonged QRS duration (≥120 ms) receiving either CRT-D or implantable cardioverter defibrillator in subgroups according to QRS morphology and 10-ms increments in QRS duration. We applied propensity score weighting to control for differences between treatments. Among patients with LBBB, women receiving CRT-D had a lower relative death risk than those receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (absolute difference, 11%; hazard ratio=0.74 [95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.81]). In men, the lower mortality with CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter defibrillator was less pronounced (absolute difference, 9%; hazard ratio=0.84 [0.79-0.89]; sex×device interaction P=0.025). In those without LBBB, the mortality difference was modest and did not differ between women and men (absolute difference, 3%; hazard ratio=0.88 [0.79-0.97] in women and absolute difference, 2%; hazard ratio=0.95 [0.91-0.998] in men; interaction P=0.17). In subgroups according to QRS duration, CRT-D was associated with better survival in both sexes with LBBB and QRS ≥130 ms, whereas there was no clear relation between QRS duration and survival in patients without LBBB regardless of patient sex. CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world population CRT-D was associated with a lower mortality risk in both sexes with LBBB, although more pronounced among women. Only among those with LBBB, both sexes had better survival with longer QRS duration. The mortality differences in patients without LBBB were attenuated in both sexes.

Diagnosis of cardiogenic shock without the use of a pulmonary artery catheter.

BACKGROUND: Current diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic shock (CS) require the use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), which is time-consuming and may cause complications. A set of simple yet accurate noninvasive diagnostic criteria would be of significant utility. METHODS: Candidate components for the Noninvasive Parameters for Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock (N-PACS) criteria were required to be objective, readily available, and noninvasive. Variables encompassing hypotension, hypoperfusion, predisposing conditions, and elevated intracardiac filling pressures were optimized versus a PAC-based standard in a retrospective developmental cohort of 122 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The finalized criteria were validated in a prospective cohort of coronary care unit patients in whom a PAC was placed for clinical indications. RESULTS: According to invasive criteria, CS was present in 32 of 217 consecutive patients undergoing PAC. Compared to the PAC-based standard, the N-PACS criteria had a sensitivity of 96.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.0-99.8), specificity of 90.8% (95% CI 85.5-94.4), positive predictive value of 64.6% (95% CI 49.4-77.4), negative predictive value of 99.4% (95% CI 96.2-100), positive likelihood ratio of 10.5 (95% CI 6.7-16.7), negative likelihood ratio of 0.03 (95% CI 0.00-0.24), and diagnostic odds ratio of 306.4. Results were similar among patients with and without AMI. CONCLUSION: A simple, echocardiography-based set of noninvasive diagnostic criteria can be used to accurately diagnose CS.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women: US Food and Drug Administration meta-analysis of patient-level data.

IMPORTANCE: Women were underrepresented in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials for heart failure (making up about 20% of enrollees). Combining individual patient data from multiple clinical trials would enable assessment of CRT benefit in women. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether women with left bundle branch block (LBBB) benefit from CRT-defibrillators (CRT-D) at a shorter QRS duration than men with LBBB do. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual patient data were pooled from 3 CRT-D vs implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials (4076 patients) enrolling predominantly patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II heart failure and follow-up to 3 years. The effect of CRT-D compared with ICD on outcomes was assessed using random effects Cox proportional hazards. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time to heart failure event or death (primary) and death alone (secondary). RESULTS: Women benefited from CRT-D more than men. The main difference occurred in patients with LBBB and a QRS of 130 to 149 milliseconds. In this group, women had a 76% reduction in heart failure or death (absolute CRT-D to ICD difference, 23%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.24, [95% CI, 0.11-0.53]; P < .001) and a 76% reduction in death alone (absolute difference 9%; HR, 0.24, [95% CI, 0.06-0.89]; P = .03), while there was no significant benefit in men for heart failure or death (absolute difference 4%; HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.60-1.21]; P = .38) or death alone (absolute difference 2%; HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.49-1.52]; P = .60). Neither women nor men with LBBB benefited from CRT-D at QRS shorter than 130 milliseconds, while both sexes with LBBB benefited at QRS of 150 milliseconds or longer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this population of patients with primarily mild heart failure, women with LBBB benefited from CRT-D at a shorter QRS duration than men with LBBB. This is important because recent guidelines limit the class I indication for CRT-D to patients with LBBB and QRS of 150 milliseconds or longer. While guidelines do give a class IIa indication to patients with LBBB and a QRS of 120 to 149 milliseconds, the present findings are important to communicate because women are less likely to receive CRT-D than men are. This study exemplifies the potential public health and regulatory science value of combining data from multiple clinical trials submitted to the FDA.

Sex-specific mortality risk by QRS morphology and duration in patients receiving CRT: results from the NCDR.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have suggested that women have better outcomes than men after cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare mortality after CRT-D implantation by sex, QRS morphology, and duration. METHODS: Survival curves and covariate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were used to assess mortality by sex in 31,892 CRT-D patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) registry between 2006 and 2009, with up to 5 years' follow-up (median 2.9 years, interquartile range: 2.0 to 3.9 years). Patients were grouped by QRS morphology and 10-ms increments in QRS duration. RESULTS: Among patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), women had a 21% lower mortality risk than men (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.84; p < 0.001); however, there was no sex difference in non-LBBB (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.06; p = 0.37). Longer QRS duration was associated with better survival in both sexes with LBBB, but not in patients without LBBB. Compared with women with LBBB and QRS of 120 to 129 ms, women with LBBB and QRS of 140 to 149 ms had a 27% lower mortality (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.88; p = 0.001); this difference was 18% in men (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.93; p = 0.003). Mortality in LBBB and QRS of 150 ms or longer compared with those with LBBB and QRS of 120 to 129 ms was similar between sexes (HR: 0.61 to 0.68; p < 0.001 for women and HR: 0.58 to 0.66; p < 0.001 for men). Sex interactions within 10-ms groups were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with LBBB who received CRT-D, mortality is lower in women than men. Additionally, longer QRS duration in LBBB is associated with better survival in both sexes. In contrast, there is no sex difference in patients without LBBB, regardless of QRS duration. Further studies should include a non-CRT comparator group to confirm these findings.

Left bundle branch block predicts better survival in women than men receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: long-term follow-up of ∼ 145,000 patients.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that in recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D), conventional left bundle branch block (LBBB) diagnosis predicts better survival in women than in men. BACKGROUND: New York Heart Association class I and II patients without LBBB do not benefit from CRT-D, and women have better survival after CRT-D than men. Separate analysis suggests that QRS duration thresholds for LBBB diagnosis differ according to sex, and conventional LBBB electrocardiographic criteria are falsely positive in men more frequently than in women. METHODS: We analyzed Medicare records from 144,642 CRT-D recipients between 2002 and 2008 that were followed up for up to 90 months. Medicare billing data were used to determine age, sex, race, and comorbidities. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to assess if conventional LBBB diagnosis had different prognostic significance according to sex. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, LBBB was associated with a 31% reduction in death in women (HR: 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67 to 0.71]) but only a 16% reduction in death in men (HR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.82 to 0.85]). In multivariable analyses controlling for comorbidities, LBBB was associated with a 26% reduction in death in women (HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.71 to 0.77]) and a 15% reduction in death in men (HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.83 to 0.87]). A significant interaction (p < 0.0001) between sex and LBBB was seen. CONCLUSIONS: LBBB diagnosis is associated with greater survival in women than in men receiving CRT-D, and this discrepancy is not explained by differences in measured comorbidities. Possible explanations for this difference include that LBBB may have different prognostic significance according to sex or that LBBB diagnosis is more often false-positive in men compared with women.

Gender- and race-based utilization and outcomes of pulmonary artery catheterization in the setting of full-time intensivist staffing.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding gender- or race-based differences in critical care. We investigated whether gender or race was associated with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) utilization or with in-hospital death among patients with a PAC. A particular focus was patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), in whom guidelines recommend PAC use. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis from the coronary care unit of a large tertiary-care hospital staffed with full-time cardiac intensivists. RESULTS: We analyzed 8845 consecutive adult patients, of whom 42.1% were women and 40.8% were black. PAC use rates were 11.3% in women and 11.5% in men (P = 0.79), and 11.3% in blacks and 11.5% in whites (P = 0.76). In CS patients, PAC use rates in women and men were 50.3% and 49.1% (P = 0.85) and in blacks and whites were 43.7% and 53.3% (P = 0.05). There was no independent association between gender or race and PAC use overall or in those with CS. Neither gender nor race was a predictor of in-hospital death in patients undergoing PAC. CONCLUSIONS: PAC use and in-hospital death were determined not by gender or race but by disease severity. Full-time intensivist staffing and the presence of definitive guidelines may reduce gender- and race-based treatment disparities.