Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Gac Sanit ; 22(1): 48-51, 2008.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18261443

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To identify the factors associated with a higher risk of inappropriate days of stay. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Crude and adjusted inappropriateness rates were calculated using negative binomial regression to obtain information about the relative risk of each variable. The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was applied to collect information about patients' hospital stays. RESULTS: A total of 34.17% (95%CI, 33.28-35.08) of the stays were inappropriate. Women, age older than 65 years, elective admission, and stays in medical services showed the highest inappropriateness risk. Lack of correct patient follow-up in the medical record increased the risk of inappropriateness to 36%. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of continual registration of the patient's clinical course increased the risk of inappropriate days of stay in the hospital. The use of the negative binomial is a valid and simple option for analysis of this type of phenomenon.


Subject(s)
Health Services Misuse/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Binomial Distribution , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Spain , Time Factors
2.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 22(1): 48-51, ene.-feb. 2008. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-63369

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Identificar los factores asociados a un mayor riesgo de estancias inadecuadas. Material y método: Se calcularon las tasas crudas y ajustadas de inadecuación mediante regresión binomial negativa, obteniéndose los riesgos relativos para distintas variables. La recogida de datos se realizó mediante el Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Resultados: El 34,17% (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 33,28-35,08) de las estancias fueron inadecuadas. Las mujeres, los mayores de 65 años, los ingresos programados y las estancias en servicios médicos tuvieron más riesgo de inadecuación. La ausencia en la historia clínica de un seguimiento continuado del paciente incrementa el riesgo de inadecuación un 36%. Conclusiones: La ausencia de un registro continuado de la evolución clínica del paciente es un factor que incrementa el riesgo de estancias inadecuadas. La utilización de la binomial negativa es una alternativa válida y sencilla para el análisis de este tipo de fenómenos


Background: To identify the factors associated with a higher risk of inappropriate days of stay. Material and method: Crude and adjusted inappropriateness rates were calculated using negative binomial regression to obtain information about the relative risk of each variable. The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was applied to collect information about patients' hospital stays. Results: A total of 34.17% (95%CI, 33.28-35.08) of the stays were inappropriate. Women, age older than 65 years, elective admission, and stays in medical services showed the highest inappropriateness risk. Lack of correct patient follow-up in the medical record increased the risk of inappropriateness to 36%. Conclusions: Lack of continual registration of the patient's clinical course increased the risk of inappropriate days of stay in the hospital. The use of the negative binomial is a valid and simple option for analysis of this type of phenomenon


Subject(s)
Humans , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Misuse/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Hospital Records/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...