Successful pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for uterine arterovenous malformation: a rare case report.

OBJECTIVE: This paper reports on a rare case of pregnancy after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for uterine arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Debate exists about persistence of fertility in women after UAE. Adverse effects of this technique can modify both uterine echostructure, inducing necrosis and infarction, endometrial atrophy and uterine artery rupture, and ovarian reserve, causing persistent amenorrhea. Ovarian reserve appears to be affected by UAE in pre-menopausal women. However, younger ovaries (according to biological ovarian age) exhibit a greater capacity for recovery after ovarian damage. Therefore, larger studies are needed for more conclusive results. CASE REPORT: A 28-year-old woman was admitted to our department due to life-threatening uterine bleeding, resulting in tachycardia, pallor, and sweating. The patient came with a history of two spontaneous miscarriages. After sonography and computed tomography, AVMs were identified at uterine fundus and anterior wall. CONCLUSION: The pathogenesis of infertility after UAE is not yet known. The peculiarity of this case was that, only few months later, the patient became pregnant and gave birth to a live fetus at 37 weeks with cesarean delivery.

[The identification of the criteria of malignancy and the tissue characterization of expansive processes in periskeletal soft tissues. The current role of magnetic resonance]. / Identificazione dei criteri di malignità e caratterizzazione tissutale dei processi espansivi dei tessuti molli peri-scheletrici. Ruolo attuale della Risonanza Magnetica.

INTRODUCTION: Expansive masses arising from periskeletal soft tissues are a frequent challenge for the imaging specialist. Lesion diagnosis and characterization, and the assessment of benign/malignant nature are very important factors for treatment planning. We investigated MR capabilities in distinguishing benign from malignant masses and for histopathologic lesion characterization, also in the light of the latest most authoritative literature reports. MATERIAL AND METHODS: February 1995 to November 1997, we examined 237 patients with known space-occupying lesions arising from periskeletal soft tissues. T1- and PD/T2-weighted SE images were acquired on the most suitable planes. The findings were independently evaluated by two groups of radiologists who were asked a benignity/malignancy judgment based on specific morphological criteria and then a presumptive histopathologic characterization. The results were then compared with pathologic findings. RESULTS: We had high agreement rates for benignity/malignancy judgements, with only < or = 3.8% error rates. In contrast, rates were quite variable for histopathologic characterization and differed greatly by lesion type. The lesions, defined as malignant, could not be characterized histologically in approximately 18% of cases by both groups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results, which are in substantial agreement with the recent authoritative literature, confirm MRI as an extremely reliable tool for distinguishing benign from malignant expansive masses arising from periskeletal soft tissues. On the contrary, MRI exhibits good specificity in histopathologic characterization only for the masses with such development as to permit identification of the anatomical compartment of origin, which are usually benign, as well as the masses with typical or pathognomonic tissue signal.