Transcatheter closure of PFO as secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke.

This article covers the main unsolved issues regarding the potential role that the patent foramen ovale (PFO) plays in the genesis of so-called cryptogenic stroke. Some brief notions of the anatomy and epidemiology of the PFO are outlined. Subsequently, the results of the three trials on secondary prevention (medical therapy vs. transcatheter closure) in patients with PFO and a history of cryptogenic stroke are presented. The conflicting results of numerous meta-analyses derived from the three randomized controlled trials are discussed. Official scientific guidelines dispute an alleged superior efficacy of transcatheter PFO occlusion in comparison with antithrombotic therapy alone (anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents), except for selected cases of patients with documented PFO and a concomitant clinical-instrumental picture of deep venous thrombosis. Nevertheless, considering recent doubts about the presumptive thrombogenic and arrhythmogenic potential of PFO occlusion, which concerns only one of the septal occluders previously used, further in-depth investigations are warranted, centered on the use of newer dedicated devices to be tested in comparison with antithrombotic regimens alone.

Hypertonic saline plus i.v. furosemide improve renal safety profile and clinical outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure: A meta-analysis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: In advanced congestive heart failure (CHF), intravenous (i.v.) inotropic agents, i.v. diuretics, ultrafiltration, and hemodialysis have been shown to not yield better clinical outcomes. In this scenario, the simultaneous administration of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) and furosemide may offer a more effective therapeutic option with a good safety profile. METHODS: Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to compare combined therapy, consisting of i.v. furosemide plus concomitant administration of HSS, with i.v. furosemide alone for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The outcomes we chose were all-cause mortality, risk of re-hospitalization for ADHF, length of hospital stay, weight loss, and variation of serum creatinine. RESULTS: Based on five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,032 patients treated with i.v. HSS plus furosemide vs. 1,032 patients treated with i.v. furosemide alone, a decrease in all-cause mortality in patients treated with HSS plus furosemide was proven [RR = 0.57; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.44-0.74, p = 0.0003]. Likewise, combined therapy with HSS plus furosemide was shown to be associated with a reduced risk of ADHF-related re-hospitalization (RR = 0.51; 95 % CI = 0.35-0.75, p = 0.001). Besides, combined therapy with HSS plus furosemide was found to be associated with a reduced length of hospital stay (p = 0.0002), greater weight loss (p < 0.00001), and better preservation of renal function (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: HSS as an adjunct to i.v. furosemide for diuretic-resistant CHF patients led to a better renal safety profile and improved clinical endpoints such as mortality and heart failure-related hospitalizations.

Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib or etoricoxib: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which adopted comparison with placebo or naproxen.

AIM: The present meta-analysis attempted to assess whether an unfavourable cardiovascular risk profile could be identified in the case of two COX2 selective inhibitors (COXIBs), namely celecoxib and etoricoxib. Based on the data from the literature, our meta-analysis aimed to assess the probability of major cardiovascular events reported with the use of celecoxib or etoricoxib and compare this with the results seen in patients assigned to the placebo group. Furthermore, the risk of cardiovascular events found by using celecoxib or etoricoxib was also compared with that associated with the use of naproxen, a nonselective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) chosen as our reference drug. METHODS: The studies had to be randomized controlled trials with at least 4-week duration. Studies were included if they compared celecoxib or etoricoxib against placebo or naproxen. Moreover, the selected studies had to have determined the risk, odds or incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death. For the comparisons versus placebo, the endpoints of interest were "serious vascular events", "non-fatal myocardial infarction", "non-fatal stroke" and "death from cardiovascular causes", whereas "myocardial infarction" and "stroke" were the endpoints of interest concerning the comparison versus naproxen. RESULTS: From the evaluation of 41 studies comparing celecoxib with placebo, we found a significantly higher incidence of serious vascular events in the celecoxib group compared to controls treated with placebo (rate ratio 1.598, 95% CI: 1.048 to 2.438; P=0.029). Furthermore, in patients allocated to treatment with celecoxib, we found an incidence rate of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction that was three times higher compared with the placebo group (rate ratio 3.074, 95% CI: 1.375-6.873, P=0.006). In contrast, we did not find any significant difference with regard to the incidence of nonfatal stroke and that of death from cardiovascular causes by comparing celecoxib and placebo. In addition, by examining cardiovascular outcomes that emerged from the 17 trials which compared etoricoxib with placebo, it was not possible to demonstrate statistically significant differences in incidence for each of the explored endpoints. With regard to the comparison of each coxib with the non-selective COX2 inhibitor naproxen, we did not find any significant difference for either the odds of myocardial infarction or that of stroke. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our meta-analysis, we can state that symptomatic benefits induced by the prolonged administration of celecoxib may be partially invalidated by a concomitant increase in vascular risk, particularly the increased risk of myocardial infarction found in celecoxib-treated patients, compared to controls taking placebo. In contrast, treatment with etoricoxib proved not to result in an increased risk of serious vascular events when compared with both the placebo and naproxen. Our meta-analysis also denotes that the alternative to COXIBs, represented by naproxen, does not show significant benefit in terms of reduced cardiovascular risk. Therefore, considering that the increase in incidence rate of cardiovascular events associated with treatment with celecoxib is small in absolute terms, it is reasonable to state that celecoxib is still a drug whose benefits outweigh the potential adverse effects on the cardiovascular system.

Natriuretic peptide-guided therapy: further research required for still-unresolved issues.

It has been asserted that serial measurements of natriuretic peptides (NPs), i.e., B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or the amino-terminal fragment of pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP), could help modulate more accurately the intensity of drug treatment in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Nevertheless, there are still several open questions about the presumed role of NP-guided pharmacologic adjustment as a valuable strategy in this setting. In this review, we outline the main randomized controlled trials (RCTs) carried out to date regarding NP-guided therapy in CHF patients and we focus on some of the still-unresolved issues. In particular, we discuss which NP plasma level should be assumed as the optimal target level to be attained, and we debate the possible influence exerted by different age classes on clinical end points during NP-guided therapy. The possible advantages and limitations for the cardiovascular system arising from the functional activation of NPs in CHF patients are also discussed. Although the pooling of data derived from the RCTs demonstrates an overall effect of slightly significant improvement in clinical outcomes with the NP-guided approach, we have noted that there are some relatively large studies that failed to document a significant clinical improvement in terms of mortality and morbidity using an NP-guided strategy. Thus, in our opinion, larger and better conducted trials addressing the unresolved issues of NP-guided therapy should be undertaken in the future.

In right or biventricular chronic heart failure addition of thiazides to loop diuretics to achieve a sequential blockade of the nephron is associated with increased risk of dilutional hyponatremia: results of a case-control study.

AIM: Chronic hyponatremia is frequently found in some syndromes characterized by widespread edema coupled to impairment in arterial effective circulating volume, such as congestive chronic heart failure (CHF). In this setting, it is unclear whether the hyponatremia itself makes this condition worse or whether it represents a simply marker of decompensation. The factors responsible for development of hyponatremia in CHF have not exhaustively been elucidated yet. The aim of this paper was to ascertain whether some laboratory, clinical and therapeutical factors are able to predict occurrence of hyponatremia in CHF patients. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out by recruiting 57 CHF patients, whose 19 characterized by hyponatremia (serum Na+<135 mEq/L) and 38 controls, matched for age, sex, etiology of CHF, time elapsed since beginning of both symptoms and diuretic therapy. Eligibility criteria included right or biventricular heart failure in NYHA class III, absence of hyponatremia at the first visit and therapy at enrollment with oral dose not less than 175 mg per week of furosemide or equivalent weekly dose of torsemide. Exclusion criteria were electrostimulation therapies (pace-maker or cardiac resynchronization therapy), documented episodes- one or more- of infective gastroenteritis or diarrhea and use of any drug influencing neuroendocrine mechanisms of arginin-vasopressin (AVP) secretion, such as opiates, tetracyclines, phenothiazines, lithium, serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) etc. RESULTS: At univariate analysis, intensive intravenous (iv) therapy with furosemide (one or more courses), ascites, mixed regimen with thiazide diuretic plus furosemide, high (>3 ng/mL/h) plasma renin activity, serum creatinine ≥2,2 mg/dl and oligoanuria were shown to be associated with hyponatremia. At multivariate analysis a role of predictor of hyponatremia was maintained by combined therapy with thiazide diuretic plus furosemide (OR=35.68 95%CI: 2.83-449.37 P=0.0057) as well as by intensive iv furosemide therapy (OR=12.44 95%CI: 1.207-128.27 P=0.0342). CONCLUSION: Inhibition of free water clearance by thiazides may account for association found between their use and hyponatremia development in congestive CHF setting. Even though loop diuretics are known to promote free water excretion, in our experience hyponatremia might have been favored by iv furosemide high doses, because drop in effective circulating volume and further impairment in arterial underfilling due to overzealous iv loop diuretic administration are able to foster AVP non osmotic release, thereby leading to hemodilution hyponatremia.

In chronic heart failure with marked fluid retention, the i.v. high doses of loop diuretic are a predictor of aggravated renal dysfunction, especially in the set of heart failure with normal or only mildly impaired left ventricular systolic function.

AIM: In the presence of resistance to oral diuretics in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with extreme hydrosaline retention, among the proposed therapeutic options the administration of high doses of loop diuretics - either intravenous (i.v.) boluses or i.v. continuous infusion - should first of all be considered. Nevertheless, the use of this therapy may lead to the risk of further aggravation of frequently coexisting renal dysfunction, especially when loop diuretics such as furosemide (FUR), torasemide etc. are administered at excessive doses leading to hypotension, hypoperfusion and/or relative dehydration in patients with decompensated CHF who could have benefit from intensive unloading therapy. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical and hematochemical markers which are able to predict a possible decline or rapid deterioration of renal function implying a rise in serum creatinine (Cr) >25% of its basal value, i.e. the so-called aggravated renal dysfunction (ARD), typically occurring during intensive unloading therapy with i.v. FUR or other loop diuretics, administered to CHF pts with extreme fluid retention. METHODS: The protocol of our case-control observational study established to enroll every CHF patient who was demonstrated to develop a rise in Cr suggestive of ARD at the end of i.v. diuretic therapy (VI-VIII day). For each case enrolled, 3 patients at least were selected as controls, matched for age, sex and time elapsed from the beginning of the signs and symptoms of CHF. For the prediction of the dependent variable, represented by ARD diuretic infusion-related, the following independent variables were considered: creatinine clearance (Cr clear) <60 mL/min, Cr clear expressed as a continuous variable (Cr clear continuous), daily dose of i.v. furosemide ≥ 125 mg, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), CHF with normal (≥ 50%) LVEF (HFNEF), urinary sodium concentration (U Na+) ≥ 40 mEq/L, U Na+expressed as a continuous variable (U Na+ continuous), sodium fractional excretion (FE Na+) >2%, urine/plasma concentration ratios for creatinine (U/P cr) <10, for urea (U/P urea) <5 and for osmolality (U/P osmolal) <1.1, mean duration of the symptoms of CHF, history of pre-existing parenchymal renal disease . The values of U Na+, FE Na+, U/P Cr, U/P urea and U/P osmolal were measured after discontinuance of diuretic oral therapy for four days, before the onset of intensive i.v. diuretic administration, so as to identify the patients with pathological values of tubular renal function indexes, known to be not interpretable in the presence of diuretics, suggestive of possible preexisting anatomic renal damage (acute tubular necrosis prior to onset of iv diuretic therapy). RESULTS: Nineteen 19 CHF patients with ARD and 60 controls were enrolled. At univariable analysis, Cr clear <60 mL/min, Cr clear continuous, daily dose of iv furosemide ≥ 125 mg, LVEF, HFNEF, FE Na+>2%, Na+≥ 40 mEq/L and U Na+ continuous were shown to be associated with ARD. At multivariate analysis, the role of prognostic indicator of ARD was maintained by daily dose only of iv FUR ≥125 mg (OR: 7.2088 95% CI: 1.3096-39.6802 P=0.0232). By using the 2x2 contingency tables, a qualitative interaction was identified by crossing ARD ­ outcome variable - against dose of iv FUR ≥ 125 mg/day - exposure variable - and by subsequently stratifying by the HFNEF. Actually, a significant association with ARD was not present in any CHF patient with dilated left ventricle treated with high dosage of iv FUR, whereas a highly significant association with ARD was observed in HFNEF patients (OR: 72 95% CI: 6.601-785.2694 P=0.00001) who had experienced the same high iv fur dose. CONCLUSION: In CHF patients with widespread edema refractory to oral diuretic, ARD can be propitiated by high dosages of i.v. FUR, when not associated with other treatments to preserve the effective circulating volume and renal flow. The HFNEF patients appear to be more prone to ARD related to i.v. high dosages of FUR, perhaps because their hemodynamics is more seriously harmed by the drop, FUR-related, in venous return and cardiac preload, as compared to CHF patients with reduced (45-30%) LVEF.

[Renoprotective effect of small volumes of hypertonic saline solution in chronic heart failure patients with marked fluid retention: results of a case-control study]. / Renoprotektiver Effekt kleiner Volumina hypertoner Kochsalzlösung bei Patienten mit chronischer Herzinsuffizienz und Ödembildung: Ergebnisse einer Fall-Kontroll-Studie.

During intensive therapy of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with marked fluid retention using high doses of i.v. furosemide the additional effect of agents which might exert osmotic attraction of interstitial fluids has been proposed. They are thought to impede the impairment of renal blood supply and glomerular filtration rate, which may be caused by a combined action of cardiac preload acute reduction, hypotension and neurohormonal activation.We therefore assessed in CHF patients with NYHA class III and BNP values from 900 to 1500 pg/ml, who were treated with i.v. furosemide, the predictors of iatrogenic short term creatinine impairment by means of a case-control observational study from two centers. Patients with CHF had been treated for 6-8 days with intravenous loop diuretics alone or with an additional i.v. administration of other agents (plasma expanders, albumin, mannitol, inotropic support etc.). A rise in serum creatinine ≥ 25% of the basal value was considered as renal impairment.A total of 15 cases and 38 controls were enrolled. At univariate analysis, serum creatinine basal value ≥ 2.2 mg/dl, absence of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in the therapeutic protocol, hyposodic diet and refractory oligoanuria were associated with an increased risk of worsening renal function precipitated by i.v. diuretic therapy. At multivariate analysis as a predictor of loop diuretic-related renal function impairment, we found a serum creatinine ≥ 2.2 mg/dl at baseline (OR: 63.33, 95% CI: 3.68-1088.73, p=0.0043) and the absence of HSS in the therapeutic regimen (OR: 25.0461, 95% CI: 2.07-302.53, p=0.0113). Moreover, in multivariate analysis ascites had some predictive value of renal deterioration (OR: 13.28, 95% CI: 1.0055-175.41, p=0,0495).

The risk of worsening CHF is positively related to unitary increase in mitral regurgitation size: a case-cohort study derived from a II NYHA class CHF patient population.

AIM: The passage from II to III New York Heart Association (NYHA) class is indicative of cardiopulmonary impairment and unfavourable prognosis. Among chronic heart failure(CHF) II NYHA class patients, the topic has been debated what criteria have be assumed for identifying the patients prone to accelerated progression towards III NYHA class. METHODS: A case cohort study, including a number of CHF II NYHA class patients, was carried out, to evaluate the role as predictor of CHF worsening of some ultrasonographic parameters, listed as follows: left ventricular ejection fraction, as continuous and as a dichotomous variable, i.e. subdivided as follows: 1) LVEF larger than 40% and 2) LVEF ranged from 30% to 40%; mitral regurgitation (MR), as continuous and as a dichotomic variable (i.e. moderate-to-severe MR, defined by transmitralic jet planimetric area estimated as larger than 20% of left atrium area), restrictive LV filling pattern and pulmonary systolic arterial pressure >40 mmHg. The pts were subdivided in 3 categories, as follows:1) diastolic CHF, i.e. heart failure with normal or only mildly impaired left ventricular ejection fraction - 20 patients; 2) systolic CHF, i.e. heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction - 19 patients; and 3) CHF due to "organic" mitral insufficiency-19 patients. All patients were treated with pharmacologic therapy, according to their respective clinical features and typology of basal heart disease. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) for the composite endpoint death and hospitalization due to worsening CHF were investigated, concerning each of the above-mentioned criteria. Moreover, the odds ratios (OR) were calculated, by not conditional logistic regression analysis, to achieve information about risk of death and/or worsening CHF, as well as the respective profiles of risk, assessed by relative risk (RR). RESULTS: From 173 followed-up patients, 58 patients,70+/-12 aged, whose 15 cases (transition to III NYHA class) and 43 controls, were included in retrospective analysis. Notewhorty, moderate-to-severe MR only seemed to play a role as reliable predictor of worsening CHF(sensitivity: 93.3%; specificity: 69.7%; PPV: 51.8%; NPV: 96.7%; RR:15.93; OR: 32.3), as its sensitivity and PPV, particularly, were shown to exceed far and away the values of sensitivity and PPV associated to each of other echographic and/or clinical variables. Nevertheless, at multivariate analysis,MR expressed as continuous variable only, but not as "categorical" variable-was demonstrated to independently predict the transition from II to III NYHA class, over two years clinical follow up. CONCLUSION: The present data seem to support the view that the larger regurgitant jet of mitral insufficiency, the higher the risk of worsening CHF during a two years follow up. Likewise, it is plausible the moderate-severe MR represents a predictor of increased risk of transition to III NYHA class among the CHF II NYHA class patients. In addition, this study seems to indicate that a surgical therapy (prosthetic replacement or mitral valvuloplasty)should always be planned in the case of II NYHA class CHF patient who has been recognized affected by moderate-to-severe MR, since the chances of successful pharmacological prevention of clinical impairment in this setting turned out to be very slight.