Obstetric units' preparedness to manage critically ill women. The second report from the MaCriCare study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the availability of 31 distinct services and facilities to diagnose, resuscitate, and treat critically unwell obstetric patients. METHODS: Using a network of anesthesiologists, intensive care clinicians, obstetricians, critical care nurses, and midwives (MaCriCare) from September 2021 to January 2022, we conducted a descriptive international multicenter cross-sectional survey in centers with obstetric units (OUs) in the WHO Europe Region. RESULTS: The MaCriCare network covers 26 countries and received 1133 responses, corresponding to 2.5 million annual deliveries. The survey identified significant disparities in the availability of the measured 31 services among the OUs, with some services not immediately available and some not available at all. Point-of-care hemoglobin measurements were lacking in 13.8% of OUs. 15.2% of OUs lacked pointof-care lactate measurement, and 11% lacked transfusion services. 23.8% of OUs lacked the ability to administer hypotensive agent infusions in the labor ward. Samebuilding access to cell saver and thromboelastometry was unavailable to 45.5% and 64.4% of OUs, respectively. Access to invasive ventilation was unavailable to 3.4% of OUs, 11.7% were unable to offer same-building access to non-invasive ventilation, and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation was unavailable to 38.3% of the OUs. CONCLUSION: Critically ill obstetric patients have access to markedly different resources in the WHO Europe Region depending on the OU where they are managed. Consensus on which facilities and services should be universally available is urgently needed.

Preparedness for severe maternal morbidity in European hospitals: The MaCriCare study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate obstetric units (OUs) and intensive care units (ICUs) preparedness for severe maternal morbidity (SMM). METHODS: From September 2021 to January 2022, an international multicentre cross-sectional study surveyed OUs in 26 WHO Europe Region countries. We assessed modified early obstetric warning score usage (MEOWS), approaches to four SMM clinical scenarios, invasive monitoring availability in OUs, and access to high-dependency units (HDUs) and onsite ICUs. Within ICUs, we examined the availability of trained staff, response to obstetric emergencies, leadership, and data collection. RESULTS: 1133 responses were evaluated. MEOWS use was 34.5%. Non-obstetric early warning scores were being used. 21.4% (242) of OUs provided invasive monitoring in the OU. A quarter lacked access to onsite HDU beds. In cases of SMM, up to 13.8% of all OUs indicated the need for transfer to another hospital. The transfer rate was highest (74.0%) in small units. 81.9% of centers provided onsite ICU facilities to obstetric patients. Over 90% of the onsite ICUs provided daily specialist obstetric reviews but lacked immediate access to key resources: 3.4% - uterotonic drugs, 7.5% - neonatal resuscitation equipment, 9.2% - neonatal resuscitation team, 11.4% - perimortem cesarean section equipment. 41.2% reported obstetric data to a national database. CONCLUSION: Gaps in provision exist for obstetric patients with SMM in Europe, potentially compromising patient safety and experience. MEOWS use in OUs was low, while access to invasive monitoring and onsite HDU and ICU facilities was variable. ICUs frequently lacked resources and did not universally collect obstetric data for quality control.

Parents' understanding of and compliance with fasting instruction for pediatric day case surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether parents understand and adhere to preoperative fasting instructions. AIM: To identify how we may reduce perioperative morbidity relating to failure to fast. BACKGROUND: Children are routinely fasted preoperatively with the aim of reducing the risk of aspiration of gastric contents and its sequelae. METHODS: Parents of children on the day case ward following elective surgery completed a survey asking: (i) For how long was your child asked to fast? (ii) How long did you ensure your child was fasted of food and clear fluids? (iii) What do you think is the purpose of fasting? We also asked the parents to complete a checklist of items they thought acceptable to consume when fasting. RESULTS: Despite affirming fasting status in the preoperative check, 13.5% were not fasted. Parents reported advised fasting times of 1-24 h (median 6) for solids and 0.5-24 h (median 3) for fluids. Children were fasted of solids for 3-40 h (median 9.5) and of fluids for 0.5-24 h (median 5). Regarding the understanding of fasting, 9 referred to aspiration and 53 to the prevention of nausea or vomiting. Thirteen believed that fasting status altered the efficacy of anesthesia. During the fasting period, 4.9% would allow French fries, 22.3% toast/crackers, 17.5% cereal, 14.7% a sweet, 14.9% gum, and 12.6% tea with milk. CONCLUSIONS: Children we believe to be fasted may not be. Parents may deliberately misrepresent the actual fasting status of their child. Adherence to fasting advice may be affected by parents' recall and understanding of fasting advice.