ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Determinar la eficacia de una intervención (Time In) para reducir el dolor y mejorar los síntomas psicológicos en personas con dolor crónico. Diseño: Ensayo clínico aleatorizado con grupo control y con 3 mediciones realizadas a lo largo de 3 meses. Emplazamiento: Granada. Participantes: Un total de 40 mujeres mayores de 18 años con una historia de dolor crónico (más de 6 meses de duración). La captación fue en la Asociación de Fibromialgia de Granada (AGRAFIM). Intervenciones: Time In es un trabajo sensoriomotriz que combina procedimientos biomecánicos fisioterapéuticos y estrategias psicológicas. Se planificó una sesión semanal de 3h de duración y el total del programa se desarrolló durante 5 semanas seguidas. Mediciones principals: Variables dependientes: puntuaciones de las escalas Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-S), Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), Symptom Check List-90-R (SCL-90-R) y Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM). Variables independientes: información sociodemográfica, historial clínico y grupo de intervención o control. Resultados: Se observaron diferencias significativas entre grupo control y grupo intervención de gran parte de las escalas utilizadas en las mediciones postintervención y seguimiento. Así pues, se obtuvieron puntuaciones medias significativamente inferiores en la intensidad, interferencia y zonas de dolor, calidad de vida, síntomas psicológicos y cambio de comportamiento. Se observaron resultados similares en las puntuaciones de d Cohen "muy importantes" en la intensidad del dolor (d = -1,01, d = -0,97) y la interferencia del dolor (d = -0,85, d = 0,74), con un porcentaje de mejoría del 21 al 30%. Conclusiones. La intervención Time In reduce el dolor y mejora los síntomas psicológicos en pacientes con fibromialgia, lo que redunda en una mejor calidad de vida
Objective: To assess the effectiveness, on people with chronic pain, of an intervention (Time In) designed to reduce pain and to improve psychological symptoms. Design: A randomized clinical trial with a control group, taking three measurements over three months. Setting: Granada, Spain. Participants: A sample of 40 women aged 18 or older with a history (over 6 months) of chronic pain. The recruitment was in the Fibromyalgia Association of Granada, Spain (AGRAFIM). Interventions: Time In is a sensorimotor intervention that combines biomechanical physiotherapeutic procedures and psychological strategies. A weekly session of 3h was planned and the total of the program was developed during five weeks. Main measurements: Independent variables: sociodemographic information, clinical history and Time In intervention. Dependent variables: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-S), Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), Symptom Check List-90-R (SCL-90-R) and Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM). Results: Significant differences were observed between control group and intervention group of most of the scales used in postintervention and follow up measurements. Thus, significantly lower mean scores were obtained in intensity, interference and areas of pain, quality of life, psychological symptoms and behavioural change. Similar results were observed on d Cohen scores. They were 'very important' on intensity of pain (d = -1.01, d = -0.97) and interference of pain (d = -0.85, d = -0.74), with an improvement percentage from 21% to 30%. Conclusions: Time In intervention reduces pain and improves psychological symptoms in patients with fibromyalgia; this results in a better quality of life
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Chronic Pain/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Case-Control StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness, on people with chronic pain, of an intervention (Time In) designed to reduce pain and to improve psychological symptoms. DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial with a control group, taking three measurements over three months. SETTING: Granada, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 40 women aged 18 or older with a history (over 6 months) of chronic pain. The recruitment was in the Fibromyalgia Association of Granada, Spain (AGRAFIM). INTERVENTIONS: Time In is a sensorimotor intervention that combines biomechanical physiotherapeutic procedures and psychological strategies. A weekly session of 3h was planned and the total of the program was developed during five weeks. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Independent variables: sociodemographic information, clinical history and Time In intervention. Dependent variables: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-S), Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), Symptom Check List-90-R (SCL-90-R) and Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM). RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between control group and intervention group of most of the scales used in postintervention and follow up measurements. Thus, significantly lower mean scores were obtained in intensity, interference and areas of pain, quality of life, psychological symptoms and behavioural change. Similar results were observed on d Cohen scores. They were 'very important' on intensity of pain (d=-1.01, d=-0.97) and interference of pain (d=-0.85, d=-0.74), with an improvement percentage from 21% to 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Time In intervention reduces pain and improves psychological symptoms in patients with fibromyalgia; this results in a better quality of life.
Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy/methods , Chronic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Biofeedback, Psychology/methods , Case-Control Studies , Checklist , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Confidence Intervals , Feedback, Sensory/physiology , Female , Fibromyalgia/physiopathology , Fibromyalgia/psychology , Fibromyalgia/therapy , Health Surveys , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement , Quality of Life , Socioeconomic Factors , Spain , Statistics, Nonparametric , Symptom Assessment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of disabling chronic pain (DCP) in Spanish adults, to analyse its characteristics, to determine its multimorbidity and to identify its associated factors. SETTINGS: 2011 Andalusian Health Survey, a cross-sectional population survey based on face-to-face home interviews. PARTICIPANTS: 6507 people aged 16 years or older and living in Andalusia, Spain. OUTCOMES: The response variable was disabling chronic pain. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression models were used to analyse the association of factors with disabling chronic pain. The sample design was considered throughout the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of disabling chronic pain in the Spanish adult population was 11.36% (95% CI 11.23 to 11.49), while that of non-disabling chronic pain was 5.67% (95% CI 5.57 to 5.77). Disabling chronic pain was associated with high multimorbidity (especially in women (51%) and in the elderly (70%) with three or more additional chronic diseases), as well as with disadvantaged social status (such as female gender (OR=2.12), advanced age (OR10-year increase=1.28), unemployment (OR=1.33), manual work (OR=1.26), low income (OR=1.14) and reduced emotional social support (OR=1.04)). Other influential factors were tobacco consumption (OR=1.42), sleeping ≤7 hours (OR=1.2)], environmental or work conditions (OR=1.16) and quality of life (ORmental=1.21, ORphysical=2.37). CONCLUSIONS: The population with disabling chronic pain was associated with multimorbidity, vulnerable social status and an impaired quality of life. In contrast, the population with non-disabling chronic pain showed almost no differences when compared with the population without chronic pain. The association between DCP and mental disorders highlights the need for psychosocial services in the management of chronic pain.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Adult , Chronic Pain/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disabled Persons/psychology , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Multimorbidity , Prevalence , Sex Distribution , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of disabling chronic pain (DCP) on quality of life, work, consumption of medication and usage of health services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population study with face-to-face interview. SETTING: Andalusian Health Survey (2011 edition). PARTICIPANTS: 6,507 people over the age of 16 (p=q=0.5; confidence level=95%; sampling error=1.49, design effect=1.52). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Dependent variable: DCP: population limited in their activity by any of the CP specified in the survey. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: quality of life, absence from work, consumption of medication and utilization of health services. RESULTS: Compared to a population without CP, DCP impact is 6 points less on the mental quality of life and 12 points on the physical one, medication consumption is triple, health services utilization is almost double, and long absence from work is triple. On the other hand, a population with nondisabling chronic pain (nDCP) presents similar results to a population without CP. CONCLUSIONS: We have considered DCP as another CP category because of its huge impact, as is shown in our study, on the study variables. On the contrary, the population with nDCP does not obtain significant impact differences when compared to the population without CP. Therefore, we believe that Primary Care and Public Health should lead different prevention strategies for DCP as well as for the identification of the nDCP population to decrease its possible deterioration towards DCP.
