A Descriptive Analysis of Men Diagnosed With Epididymitis, Orchitis, or Both in the Emergency Department.

Introduction Epididymitis and orchitis are illnesses characterized by pain and inflammation of the epididymis and testicle. They represent the most common causes of acute scrotal pain in the outpatient setting. Epididymitis and orchitis have both infectious and noninfectious causes, with most cases being secondary to the invasive pathogens chlamydia, gonorrhea, and Escherichia coli (E.coli). The study's objective was to examine the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of men diagnosed with epididymitis or orchitis in a United States emergency department. Methods We examined a dataset of 75,000 emergency department (ED) patient encounters from a single health system in Northeast Ohio who underwent nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for chlamydia, gonorrhea, or trichomonas, or who received a urinalysis and urine culture. All patients were ≥18 years of age, and all encounters took place between April 18, 2014, and March 7, 2017. The analysis only included men receiving an ED diagnosis of epididymitis, orchitis, or both. We evaluated laboratory and demographic data using univariable and multivariable analyses. Results There were 1.3% (256/19,308) of men in the dataset diagnosed with epididymitis, orchitis, or both. Only 50.1% (130/256) of men diagnosed with epididymitis, orchitis, or both were tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia during their clinical encounter, and among those 13.8% (18/130) were positive. Chlamydia (12.3% [16/130]) was more common than both gonorrhea (3.1% [4/129]) and trichomonas (8.8% [3/34]) among men <35 years of age diagnosed with epididymitis, orchitis, or both. Only 62.1% of men diagnosed with epididymitis, orchitis, or both received a urine culture, of which 20.1% grew bacteria at ≥10,000 CFU/ml. E. coli (N= 20) was the most common bacteria growing in urine culture followed by Streptococcus (N= 3), Klebsiella (N= 2), Pseudomonas (N= 2), and Serratia (N= 2). Men diagnosed with epididymitis, orchitis, or both who had a positive urine culture were more likely to be ≥35 years of age, married, had higher urine white blood cells (WBCs), more urine bacteria, higher urine leukocyte esterase, more likely to have urine nitrite, and were less likely to be empirically treated for gonorrhea and chlamydia (P≤.03 for all).  Conclusions In the ED, epididymitis, orchitis, or both are uncommonly diagnosed among patients undergoing genitourinary tract laboratory testing. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common in men <35 years of age diagnosed with epididymitis, orchitis, or both, with chlamydia being most common. E. coli was the most common bacteria growing in urine culture.

Frequency of Coinfection on the Vaginal Wet Preparation in the Emergency Department.

Introduction Vaginal infections are common in the emergency department (ED) but the frequency of vaginal coinfections identified on wet preparation is unknown. Methods The study examined a data set of 75,000 ED patient encounters between April 18, 2014, and March 7, 2017, who had received testing for gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomonas or had received a urinalysis and urine culture during the ED encounter. From this data set we reviewed 16,484 patient encounters where a vaginal wet preparation was performed on women age 18 years and older. Findings from the vaginal wet preparation and ED discharge diagnoses were examined to evaluate the frequency of vaginal coinfections with vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis, and bacterial vaginosis. Results Among the women who had wet preparations, 4,124 patient encounters (25.0%) had a diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, 625 (3.8%) had a diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis, and 1,802 (10.9%) were infected with Trichomonas vaginalis. Twenty encounters (0.1%) had a diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis and trichomoniasis; 150 (0.9%), bacterial vaginosis and trichomoniasis; 136 (0.8%), vulvovaginal candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis; and 10 (0.1%), trichomoniasis, bacterial vaginosis, and vulvovaginal candidiasis. On vaginal wet preparation, the mean white blood cell count was 13.0 per high-power field. Clue cells were found in 6,988 wet preparations (42.4%); 1,065 wet preparations (6.5%) had yeast and 1,377 (8.4%) had T. vaginalis. T. vaginalis was identified in 2.5% (266/10,542) of urinalyses and 8.4% (406/4,821) of nucleic acid amplification tests. Conclusions Vaginal coinfections were uncommon among women receiving a vaginal wet preparation in the emergency department. The most common vaginal coinfection was bacterial vaginosis and trichomonas.

Descriptive Evaluation of Male Emergency Department Patients in the United States With Gonorrhea and Chlamydia.

Introduction Sexually transmitted infections are commonly tested for in the emergency department (ED), but diagnostic test results are often unavailable during the clinical encounter. Methods We retrospectively reviewed health records of 3,132 men ≥18 years that had an emergency department visit in northeast Ohio between April 18, 2014 and March 7, 2017. All subjects underwent testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. Independent t-tests and chi-square analyses were performed as well as multivariable regression analysis. Results On univariable analysis, men with N gonorrhoeae and/or C trachomatis, compared with uninfected men, were younger (25.9 vs 32.4 years), more likely to be of Black race (91.7% vs 85.6%), less likely to be married (3.7% vs 10.2%), less likely to arrive to the ED by ambulance or police (1.7% vs 4.1%), and more likely to be diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (8.3% vs 3.7%), to be treated for gonorrhea and chlamydia in the ED (84.6% vs 54.9%), and to have higher emergency severity index (ESI) scores (3.8 vs 3.6) (P ≤ .03 for all). On urinalysis, men infected with N gonorrhoeae and/or C trachomatis had significantly more white blood cells (55.1 vs 20.9); more mucus (1.3 vs 1.2); higher leukocyte esterase (1.5 vs .4); fewer squamous epithelial cells (.6 vs 1.4); higher urobilinogen (1.1 vs .8); higher bilirubin (.09 vs .05); and more protein (.4 vs .3) (P ≤ .04). Conclusions Demographic and urinalysis findings can be associated with an increased odds of men being infected with N gonorrhoeae and/or C trachomatis.

Emergency Medicine Challenges in Ecuador.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency medicine (EM) was recognized as a specialty in Ecuador in 1993. Currently, there are two four-year EM residency programs and an estimated 300 residency-trained emergency physicians countrywide. This study describes the current challenges in EM in Ecuador. METHODS: We conducted 25 semi-structured, in-person interviews with residency-trained emergency physicians, general practitioners, public health specialists, prehospital personnel, and physicians from other specialties. The interviewer asked about challenges in the areas of emergency care, working conditions of emergency physicians, EM residency education, EM leadership, and prehospital care. We analyzed data for challenges and registered the number of interviewees who mentioned each challenge. RESULTS: Interviewees worked in the three largest cities in the country: Quito (60%); Guayaquil (20%); and Cuenca (20%). Interviewees included 16 (64%) residency-trained emergency physicians; six (24%) residency-trained physicians from other specialties working in or closely associated with the emergency department (ED); one (4%) general practitioner working in the ED; one (4%) specialist in disasters; and one (4%) paramedic. Shortage of medical supplies, need for better medico-legal protection, lack of EM residencies outside of Quito, and desire for more bedside teaching were the challenges mentioned with the highest frequency (each 44%). The next most frequently mentioned challenges (each 38%) were the need for better access to ultrasound equipment and the low presence of EM outside the capital city. Other challenges mentioned included the low demand for emergency physicians in private institutions, the lack of differential pay for night and weekends, need for more training in administration and leadership, need for a more effective EM national society, and lack of resources and experience in EM research. CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine has a three-decade history in Ecuador, reaching important milestones such as the establishment of two EM residencies and a national EM society. Challenges remain in medical care, working conditions, residency education, leadership, and prehospital care. Stronger collaboration and advocacy among emergency physicians can help strengthen the specialty and improve emergency care.