Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 44(1): 3-14, 2023 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36719690

ABSTRACT

Background: Chronic urticaria (CU), characterized by ≥6 weeks of intense pruritus, remains a debilitating condition for patients. New and safe treatments are needed to manage CU recalcitrant to standard therapy. Objective: A review of the current literature of standard and novel therapeutics in the management of CU was conducted. Methods: A literature search via a medical literature data base and clinical trial data base was conducted to identify treatment options for CU and current clinical trials. Results: Second-generation antihistamines, omalizumab, and cyclosporine remain the most proven therapeutic options for CU. Dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, tezepelumab, and CDX-0159 are all undergoing clinical trials for CU. Although ligelizumab demonstrated initial promising results, a phase III study was discontinued due to a nonsuperior clinical impact compared with omalizumab. Conclusion: Novel therapies are needed for the treatment of recalcitrant CU. With a deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of CU, promising therapeutics are in clinical trials for CU.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents , Chronic Urticaria , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating , Urticaria , Humans , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Chronic Inducible Urticaria , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/therapeutic use , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/drug therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Clinical Trials as Topic
2.
Hosp Pediatr ; 13(1): 55-60, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36541053

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tolerance of uncertainty may influence how physicians and other providers practice and make clinical decisions. We hypothesized that increased tolerance of uncertainty would be associated with an increased uptake of a quality improvement (QI) intervention. METHODS: We examined tolerance of uncertainty using the Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty Scale in the context of a national QI project in the Value in Inpatient Pediatrics network. The QI project aimed to increase exclusive isotonic fluid use and decrease laboratory draws. Exposure to the intervention was measured by using the stepped wedge design with sequential implementation across a diverse group of US hospitals. Multivariable analysis was conducted by using exposure to the intervention and tolerance of uncertainty as independent variables and exclusive isotonic fluid use or laboratory testing as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Of 106 participating hospitals, 97 contributed valid responses, with an overall mean reported tolerance of uncertainty of 3.39 (95% confidence interval: 3.27-3.50), with lower numbers on the 6-point scale indicating greater tolerance of uncertainty. Exposure to the QI intervention was significantly associated with exclusive isotonic fluid use (P <.001). Lower tolerance of uncertainty at baseline was associated with lower baseline isotonic fluid use and greater uptake of the use of isotonic fluids but not reduction in laboratory testing. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, lower tolerance of uncertainty was associated with greater uptake of the QI intervention for the outcome of isotonic fluids. This initial association warrants further study to evaluate how tolerance of uncertainty plays a role in quality improvement science.


Subject(s)
Quality Improvement , Humans , Child , Uncertainty
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(5): 429-433, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196562

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical implications of reduced vancomycin susceptibility (RVS) among pediatric Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are unknown. METHODS: We identified all children at 2 children's hospitals with ≥1 blood culture positive for S. aureus. We compared patient and clinical factors for RVS and non-RVS infections using Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-squared tests. Treatment failure and the duration of bacteremia for RVS versus non-RVS and for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) versus methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections were compared using multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions, respectively. For MRSA infections, the association of empiric vancomycin monotherapy with treatment failure was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: RVS was present in 72% (309/426) of cases. No patient or infection characteristics, including methicillin resistance, were associated with RVS. RVS was associated with an increased duration of bacteremia compared with non-RVS infections, aIRR = 1.15 (95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.30). The odds of treatment failure was similar for RVS and non-RVS infections, aOR = 1.04 (0.62-1.74). In contrast, MRSA infections were more likely to have treatment failure than MSSA infections, aOR = 3.03 (95% confidence interval: 1.84-5.00). For MRSA infections, empiric vancomycin monotherapy was associated with an increased odds of treatment failure compared with non-vancomycin or combination anti-MRSA antibiotics, aOR = 3.23 (1.12-9.26). CONCLUSIONS: RVS was common and was associated with a longer duration of bacteremia but not with treatment failure. Treatment failure was more common for MRSA than for MSSA bloodstream infections. Empiric vancomycin monotherapy increased the odds of treatment failure for MRSA infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Male , Methicillin Resistance , Multivariate Analysis , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Failure , United States/epidemiology , Vancomycin Resistance
4.
BMC Pediatr ; 20(1): 468, 2020 10 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032546

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With increased use of telehealth, interventions to improve infant sleep environments have not been explored. This study sought to assess the feasibility and efficacy of using electronic health record patient portals to transmit photographs of infant sleep between mothers and healthcare professionals as part of an intervention to promote sleep environments consistent with AAP guidelines. METHODS: One hundred eighty-four mother-newborn dyads consented to participate in a randomized trial requiring patient portal registration within 1 month of delivery. We first assessed feasibility as measured by a) the proportion of consented mothers enrolling in the portal and b) maternal adherence to prompts to submit photographs of their infant sleeping to the research team through the patient portal. Intervention group mothers were prompted at 1 and 2 months; controls were prompted only at 2 months. Efficacy was determined via research assistant review of submitted photographs. These assistants were trained to detect sudden unexplained infant death risk factors utilizing AAP guidelines. Standardized feedback was returned to mothers through the patient portal. We used Fisher's Exact test to assess group differences in guideline adherence at 2 months. RESULTS: One hundred nine mothers (59%) enrolled in the patient portal and were randomized to intervention (N = 55) and control (N = 54) groups. 21 (38, 95% CI 25-52%) intervention group participants sent photographs at 1 month and received personalized feedback. Across both groups at 2 months, 40 (37, 95% CI 28-46%) sent photographs; 56% of intervention group participants who submitted photographs met all safe sleep criteria compared with 46% of controls (difference 0.10, 95% CI - 0.26 to 0.46, p = .75). Common reasons for guideline non-adherence were sleeping in a room without a caregiver (43%), loose bedding (15%) and objects (8%) on the sleep surface. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing the patient portal to individualize safe infant sleep is possible, however, we encountered numerous barriers in this trial to assess its effects on promoting safe infant sleep. Photographs of infants sleeping showed substantial non-adherence to AAP guidelines, suggesting further needs for improvement to promote safe infant sleep practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name: Improving Infant Sleep Safety With the Electronic Health Record; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03662048 ; Date of Registration: September 7, 2018; Data Sharing Statement: None.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Sudden Infant Death , Child , Communication , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant Care , Infant, Newborn , Sleep
5.
BMC Pediatr ; 20(1): 493, 2020 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33099300

ABSTRACT

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

6.
Multidiscip Respir Med ; 15(1): 664, 2020 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32549983

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical face masks are integral personal protective equipment against infectious airborne disease and become scarce during epidemic outbreaks such as COVID-19. A novel, sustainably manufactured face mask with antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties from oil of Folium Plectranthii amboinicii can be an effective alternative to internationally sold masks. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study assigned subjects (n=67) to either conventional surgical face mask or Lamdong Medical College (LMC) face mask for three hours. Fractional concentration of nitric oxide in exhaled breath (FENO) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) was measured before and after mask use. Subjective reporting on respiratory symptoms was also analyzed. Masks were then incubated and analyzed for microorganism growth. RESULTS: Subjects assigned the LMC mask had a lowered FENO (p<0.05) compared to conventional face masks after mask wearing. Subjects with LMC mask use reported higher comfortability (p<0.05), breathability (p<0.05), and lower allergy symptoms (p<0.05). The LMC mask has visually less microorganism growth in the cultured medium, measured by sterile ring radius. CONCLUSIONS: The LMC face mask is a renewably manufactured personal protective tool with antibacterial capacity that can serve as an effective alternative to internationally sold surgical face mask during shortage of mask due to COVID-19.

7.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 40(5): 311-315, 2019 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31514789

ABSTRACT

Background: Aspirin (ASA) desensitization and continuous daily ASA therapy is the criterion standard treatment for ASA-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). However, the optimal maintenance dosage of ASA and safety of "bridging" patients with AERD and with alternative cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitors for surgery have not been determined and require further investigation. Objective: This study was designed to compare the long-term effects of different maintenance doses of ASA and to assess the success of bridging subjects with AERD for surgery without losing desensitization. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 36 subjects with AERD who successfully underwent ASA desensitization from 2011 to 2017. We performed comprehensive medical record reviews and subsequent telephone interviews with a questionnaire. Results: Of 36 subjects, the average age was 52.8 years, with an average of 3.2 years since desensitization, and 65% were women. The subjects reported a decrease in frequency of nasal symptoms (p < 0.001), asthma symptoms (p = 0.016), and sinus infections (p < 0.001) after desensitization. Improvements were reported in sense of smell, taste, quality of sleep, and quality of life (p < 0.001) in all dosage groups. Thirteen subjects required stopping of ASA for surgeries. Six subjects (46%) were bridged with ibuprofen on an average of 5.9 days before surgery and restarted ASA on an average of 1.3 days after surgery, with no incidence of major adverse events or loss of desensitization. Seven subjects (54%) were not bridged, with three subjects restarting ASA after surgery without symptoms and four subjects losing desensitization. Conclusion: There did not seem to be a difference of benefits between 325 mg once or twice a day compared with 650 mg once or twice a day, but our small subject numbers made this conclusion difficult to prove. Desensitization improved subjective reporting on sleep quality as well as quality of life. Bridging the subjects with AERD who required surgery by using ibuprofen seemed to be safe and effective in maintaining ASA desensitization.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Aspirin/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic , Adult , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/methods , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...