ABSTRACT
Scientific literacy is a key factor of personal competitiveness, and reading is the most common activity in daily learning life, and playing the influence of reading on individuals day by day is the most convenient way to improve the level of scientific literacy of all people. Reading engagement is one of the important student characteristics related to reading literacy, which is highly malleable and is jointly reflected by behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement, and it is of theoretical and practical significance to explore the relationship between reading engagement and scientific literacy using reading engagement as an entry point. In this study, we used PISA2018 data from China to explore the relationship between reading engagement and scientific literacy with a sample of 15-year-old students in mainland China. 36 variables related to reading engagement and background variables (gender, grade, and socioeconomic and cultural status of the family) were selected from the questionnaire as the independent variables, and the score of the Scientific Literacy Assessment (SLA) was taken as the outcome variable, and supervised machine learning method, the XGBoost algorithm, to construct the model. The dataset is randomly divided into training set and test set to optimize the model, which can verify that the obtained model has good fitting degree and generalization ability. Meanwhile, global and local personalized interpretation is done by introducing the SHAP value, a cutting-edge machine model interpretation method. It is found that among the three major components of reading engagement, cognitive engagement is the more influential factor, and students with high reading cognitive engagement level are more likely to get high scores in scientific literacy assessment, which is relatively dominant in the model of this study. On the other hand, this study verifies the feasibility of the current popular machine learning model, i.e., XGBoost, in a large-scale international education assessment program, with a better model adaptability and conditions for global and local interpretation.
ABSTRACT
How to effectively evaluate students' essays based on a series of relatively objective writing criteria has always been a topic of discussion. With the development of automatic essay scoring, a key question is whether the writing quality can be evaluated systematically based on the scoring rubric. To address this issue, we used an innovative set of graph-based features to predict the quality of Chinese middle school students' essays. These features are divided into four sub-dimensions: basic characteristics, main idea, essay content, and essay development. The results show that graph-based features were significantly better at predicting human essay scores than the baseline features. This indicates that graph-based features can be used to reliably and systematically evaluate the quality of an essay based on the scoring rubric, and it can be used as an alternative tool to replace or supplement human evaluation.
ABSTRACT
With the purpose to assist the subject matter experts in specifying their Q-matrices, the authors used expectation-maximization (EM)-based algorithm to investigate three alternative Q-matrix validation methods, namely, the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), the marginal maximum likelihood estimation (MMLE), and the intersection and difference (ID) method. Their efficiency was compared, respectively, with that of the sequential EM-based δ method and its extension (ς2), the γ method, and the nonparametric method in terms of correct recovery rate, true negative rate, and true positive rate under the deterministic-inputs, noisy "and" gate (DINA) model and the reduced reparameterized unified model (rRUM). Simulation results showed that for the rRUM, the MLE performed better for low-quality tests, whereas the MMLE worked better for high-quality tests. For the DINA model, the ID method tended to produce better quality Q-matrix estimates than other methods for large sample sizes (i.e., 500 or 1,000). In addition, the Q-matrix was more precisely estimated under the discrete uniform distribution than under the multivariate normal threshold model for all the above methods. On average, the ς2 and ID method with higher true negative rates are better for correcting misspecified Q-entries, whereas the MLE with higher true positive rates is better for retaining the correct Q-entries. Experiment results on real data set confirmed the effectiveness of the MLE.
