ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the associations between parental readiness for discharge and neonatal growth. DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 549 newborns whose parents filled out the Newborn-Parental Readiness for Discharge Scale (N-PRDS).Additionally, data on birth weight, length, and head circumference were collected.The total N-PRDS scores were divided into three levels in terms of readiness: low, intermediate, and high readiness. Parents and infants were followed up 42 days after the birth, and the weight, length, and head circumference of the newborns were measured at the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 306 data were obtained. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) showed that time and parental readiness had an interaction effect on the weight, length and head circumference of infants. The difference in weight between infants under the high and low readiness conditions at 42 days increased by 0.357 kg compared to the difference at birth. The difference in length between high readiness infants and low readiness infants at 42 days increased by 2.155 cm compared to the difference at birth. The difference between the infants' head circumference under the high and low readiness conditions at 42 days was 0.873 cm higher than that at birth. CONCLUSIONS: High readiness for discharge could promote an increase in infant weight, length,and head circumference at 42 days after birth. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Nurses should assess parental readiness prior to the discharge of newborns by using the N-PRDS and provide discharge guidance and education to newborns' parents based on the outcomes of this scale.
Subject(s)
Parents , Patient Discharge , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Birth Weight , China , HospitalsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To study the association between neonatal discharge preparedness and adverse health events. METHODS: The neonates who were born in hospitals from different regions of Gansu Province in China and their parents were enrolled as subjects, and an investigation was performed for the discharge preparedness. According to the level of discharge preparedness, the subjects were divided into low-, middle-, and high-level groups. The neonates were followed up to observe the incidence rate of adverse health events within one month after discharge. The association between neonatal discharge preparedness and adverse health events was analyzed. RESULTS: The neonates with adverse health events had a significantly lower level of discharge preparedness than those without adverse events (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the incidence rate of adverse health events was reduced by 34.8% in the middle-level group and 78.7% in the high-level group compared with the low-level group (P<0.05). The readmission rate of neonates was 8.1% (35/430), and the neonates readmitted had a significantly lower level of discharge preparedness than those not readmitted (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the readmission rate of neonates was reduced by 67.4% in the middle-level group and 84.2% in the high-level group compared with the low-level group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Discharge preparedness may affect the incidence of adverse health events and the rate of readmission within one month after discharge. Medical staff should adopt effective intervention measures to improve discharge preparedness, so as to reduce the incidence of adverse health events and the rate of readmission.
