[A Dutch roadmap for care without belts usage]. / De weg naar een bandenloze zorg in Nederland.

The use of physical restraints still is highly prevalent in institutional long term care settings for older people. We know that the use of restrictive measures, such as belt restraints, do have many negative consequences for residents, and even can be harmful to their health. However, this knowledge does not result in a reduction of physical restraints. This paper describes the search for an intervention (EXBELT) aiming to safely reduce and prevent the use of belt restraints in nursing homes. EXBELT consists of a promotion of institutional policy change that discourages use of belt restraints, nursing home staff education, availability of alternative interventions, and consultation by a nurse specialist. Effect evaluations show that EXBELT is effective on the short and long term. According to a process evaluation, EXBELT was largely performed according to protocol and very well received by nursing home staff and resident's relatives. However, concurrently it is stated that the reduction of physical restraints in Dutch nursing home care runs slowly. The conclusion is that continuing focus is needed to reduce physical restraints in nursing homes and to prevent its use in home care.

Use of a falls incident reporting system to improve care process documentation in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: Falls are the most frequently reported adverse event among frail nursing home residents and are an important resident safety issue. Incident reporting systems have been successfully used to improve quality and safety in healthcare. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of a systematically guided menu-driven incident reporting system (MDIRS) on documentation of post-fall evaluation processes in nursing homes. METHODS: Six for-profit nursing homes in southeastern USA participated in the study. Over a 4-month period, MDIRS was used in three nursing homes matched with another three nursing homes which continued using their existing narrative incident report to document falls. Trained geriatric nurse practitioner auditors used a data collection audit tool to collect medical record documentation of the processes of care for residents who fell. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to compare the post-fall nursing care processes documented in the medical records. RESULTS: 207 medical records of resident who fell were examined. Over 75% of the sample triggered at high risk for falls by the minimum data set. An adequate neurological assessment was documented for only 18.4% of residents who had experienced a fall. Although two-thirds of the sample had a diagnosis of incontinence, less than 20% of the records had incontinence-related interventions in the nursing care plan. Overall, there was more complete documentation of the post-fall evaluation process in the medical records in nursing homes using the MDIRS than in nursing homes using standard narrative incident reports (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Further improvements are necessary in reporting mechanisms to improve the post-fall assessment in nursing home residents.

Creating order out of chaos: models of GNP practice with hospitalized older adults.

It has been well documented that hospitalization of an older adult can trigger a cascade of events that negatively affect quality of life long after hospitalization. Three models of care directed by hospital-based geriatric nurse practitioners (GNPs) are described. The GNPs' roles include primary care provider, consultant, educator, researcher, and/or administrator. In one model, the GNP collaborated with a multi-disciplinary team to create a clinical pathway, the Functional Recovery Pathway. In the second model, the GNP and nurse manager addressed the issue of fall risk with an education program for the staff. As a result, the fall rate decreased 5.8%. In a third model, the GNP coordinated care of hospitalized nursing home residents in a "scatter bed" program. Working synergistically with a case management program, the length of stay for this group of patients decreased from a median of 12 days to 9 days in the first year to 6.8 days in the third year. All three models showed that the GNP facilitate change, improve resource utilization, and create innovative strategies to optimize care for hospitalized elders.

Historical analysis of siderail use in American hospitals.

PURPOSE: To explore the social, economic, and legal influences on siderail use in 20th century American hospitals and how use of siderails became embedded in nursing practice. DESIGN: Social historical research. METHODS: Numerous primary and secondary sources were collected and interpreted to illustrate the pattern of siderail use, the value attached to siderails, and attitudes about using siderails. FINDINGS: The persistent use of siderails in American hospitals indicates a gradual consensus between law and medicine rather than an empirically driven nursing intervention. Use of siderails became embedded in nursing practice as nurses assumed increasing responsibility for their actions as institutional employees. CONCLUSIONS: New federal guidelines, based on reports of adverse consequences associated with siderails, are limiting siderail use in hospitals and nursing homes across the United States. Lowering siderails and using alternatives will depend on new norms among health care providers, hospital administrators, bed manufacturers, insurers, attorneys, regulators, and patients and their families.

Individualized interventions to prevent bed-related falls and reduce siderail use.

Five categories of problems that often result in siderail use: memory disorder, impaired mobility, injury risk, nocturia/incontinence, and sleep disturbance. As nursing homes work toward meeting the Health Care Financing Administration's mandate to examine siderail use, administrators and staff need to implement interventions that support safety and individualize care for residents. While no one intervention represents a singular solution to siderail use, a range of interventions, tailored to individual needs, exist. This article describes the process of selecting individualized interventions to reduce bed-related falls.

The relationship between physical restraint removal and falls and injuries among nursing home residents.

BACKGROUND: A major reason cited for continued restraint use in American nursing homes is the widely held belief that restraint reduction will lead to fall-related incidents and injuries. METHODS: This study represents an analysis of data collected in a clinical trial of interventions aimed at reducing the use of restraints in nursing homes. Two different designs were employed to test the relationship between restraint reduction and falls/injuries. First, multiple logistic regression was used to compare fall/injury rates in subjects who had restraints removed (n = 38) to those who continued to be restrained (n = 88); second, survival analysis was employed to test the relationship between physical restraint removal and falls/injuries at the institutional level by comparing fall/injury rates among three nursing homes (n = 633) with varying rates of restraint reduction. RESULTS: Based on the multiple logistic regression analysis, there was no indication of increased risk of falls or injuries with restraint removal. Moreover, restraint removal significantly decreased the chance of minor injuries due to falls (adjusted odds ratio: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.9; p < .05). The survival analysis demonstrated that the nursing home that had the least restraint reduction (11%) had a 50% higher rate of falls (p < .01) and more than twice the rate of fall-related minor injuries (p < .001) when compared to the homes with 23% and 56% restraint reduction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Physical restraint removal does not lead to increases in falls or subsequent fall-related injury in older nursing home residents.

Individualized assessment and intervention in bilateral siderail use.

The use of bilateral siderails, similar to physical restraints, can be safely reduced by a comprehensive assessment process. This article presents an individualized assessment for evaluating siderail use to guide nurses in managing resident characteristics for falling out of bed and intervening for high-risk residents. The individualized assessment is consistent with federal resident assessment instrument requirements and includes risk factors specific to falls from bed.

Effects of a restraint reduction intervention and OBRA '87 regulations on psychoactive drug use in nursing homes.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the changes in psychoactive drug use in nursing homes after implementation of physical restraint reduction interventions and mandates of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA '87). METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted using data from a controlled clinical trial that took place in three nursing homes: a control home, one that received an educational intervention, and one that received an educational/consultation intervention. All three homes were influenced by the OBRA mandates. Complete pre- and 6 months' post-intervention data on use of psychoactive drugs and physical restraints were available for 446 resident subjects. Changes were first analyzed with the resident subjects as the unit of analysis and then using the nursing home ward (n = 16) as the unit of analysis. RESULTS: While physical restraint use declined in the home that received the educational/consultation intervention, neither neuroleptic nor benzodiazepine use increased in any of the homes after the interventions. The percentage of residents taking neuroleptics declined in the control home (18.6% to 11.3%, P = .014). Benzodiazepine use, which was more prevalent than described previously in the literature, declined in all three homes (P < .001). Of those residents whose physical restraints were discontinued, only 2% were started on neuroleptics. When the effect of OBRA mandates on appropriateness of neuroleptic use was examined, the percentage of residents on neuroleptics who lacked an OBRA-approved indication declined from 21.3% to 14.6% in the total sample, and from 39.9% to 8% in the control home. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce physical restraint did not lead to an increase in psychoactive drug use; further, reduction in both can occur simultaneously. OBRA mandates regarding psychoactive drug use were not uniformly effective, but appear, at minimum, to have increased awareness of the indications for neuroleptics.

Reporting elder mistreatment.

Elder mistreatment, defined as the abuse and neglect of older persons, includes physical, psychological, and sexual abuse, caregiver and self-neglect, and financial exploitation. Fifty states and the District of Columbia have passed legislation to establish adult protective service (APS) programs. State APS statutes authorize APS agencies to investigate cases of elder mistreatment. Some status fund services to alleviate the abusive or neglectful situation. This article analyzes the critical aspects of state-specific APS legislation affecting nursing practice with older adults and the nurse's role in reporting cases of elder mistreatment.

A clinical trial to reduce restraints in nursing homes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative effects of two experimental interventions on the use of physical restraints. DESIGN: Prospective 12-month clinical trial in which three nursing homes were randomly assigned to restraint education (RE), restraint education-with-consultation (REC), or control (C). SETTING: Three voluntary nursing homes in the Philadelphia area providing both skilled and intermediate care. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 643 nursing home residents over the age of 60 were enrolled at baseline, and 463 remained to completion (1 year). INTERVENTIONS: Both RE and REC homes received intensive education by a masters-prepared gerontologic nurse to increase staff awareness of restraint hazards and knowledge about assessing and managing resident behaviors likely to lead to use of restraints. In addition, the REC home received 12 hours per week of unit-based nursing consultation to facilitate restraint reduction in residents with more complex conditions. MEASUREMENTS: Restraint status was observed systematically at baseline, immediately after the 6-month intervention, and again at 9 and 12 months. Staff levels, psychoactive drug use, and injuries were also determined. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, the REC home had a statistically significant reduction in restraint prevalence, whereas RE and C homes did not. At 9 months (3 months post-intervention), absolute decline in the percents restrained were 7% RE, 7% C, and 20% REC; at 12 months (6 months post-intervention) declines were 4% RE, 6% C, and 18% REC. However, relative to baseline, these declines represent an average reduction in restraint use of 23% RE, 11% C, and 56% REC. The differences in changes over time were consistently significant (P = .01), whether considering survivors or those present at each time point, and also when controlling for differences between groups at baseline. Further, given any change in restraint use, REC-residents were between 25% and 40% more likely than either RE or C residents to experience decreased restraint use. Results were achieved without increased staff, psychoactive drugs, or serious fall-related injuries. CONCLUSION: A 6-month-long educational program combined with unit-based, resident-centered consultation can reduce use of physical restraints in nursing homes effectively and safely. Whether extending the intervention will achieve greater reduction is not known from these results.

Professional autonomy: essential for nurse practitioner survival in the 21st century.

This article examines nurse practitioners' (NPs) professional autonomy as a critical component of future practice success and survival. Professional autonomy provides the basis for defining and negotiating NPs' work and worth in primary care. Outcome data and analyses that delineate the unique and overlapping practice roles and responsibilities of physicians and NPs will help determine the relative value of their work. Nurse practitioners practicing as physician "substitutes" risk professional survival. Nurse practitioners need to identify nursing as their practice paradigm and nurses as their professional identity.

Physical restraint use and falls in nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between restraint use and falls while controlling for the effect of psychoactive drug use among nursing home residents, including subgroups of nursing home residents with high rates of restraint use and/or falls. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal clinical trial designed to reduce restraint use. SETTING: Three nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (n = 322) were either restrained (n = 119) or never restrained (n = 203) at each observation point during a 9.5-month data collection period that preceded the intervention phase of the clinical trial. MEASUREMENTS: We evaluated restraint status (independent variable) three times during the data collection period by direct observation over a 72-hour period. Incident reports documenting falls and fall-related injuries (dependent variables) were reviewed. Cognitive status was measured using the Folstein Mini-Mental State Exam and functional status (including ambulation status) by the Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scale. Psychoactive drug use profile was obtained through record review. MAIN RESULTS: Using multiple logistic regression, we compared the effect of restraint use on fall risk between a confused ambulatory subgroup and the remaining sample and found a significant difference in the odds ratio for falls and recurrent falls (P = .02; chi-square = 5.24, df = 1; P = .003, chi-square = 9.12, df = 1). In the confused ambulatory subgroup, restraint use was associated with increased falls (odds ratio: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.69, 3.98) as well as recurrent fall risk (odds ratio: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.03, 5.88). Increased falls and recurrent fall risk was not observed in the remaining sample (falls odds ratio: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.87; recurrent falls odds ratio: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.91). One subgroup, the nonconfused ambulatory residents, were never restrained; after removing this subgroup, the confused ambulatory continued to be associated, though not significantly, with a higher risk of falls and injuries. Only nonconfused nonambulatory restraints were associated with a lower risk of all three outcomes: falls (odds ratio: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.05, 1.58), recurrent falls (odds ratio: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.05, 4.72), and injurious falls (odds ratio:0.42, 95% CI: 0.04, 4.01); these results, however, were not statistically significant. There was no evidence that the effect of restraint use on fall risk depended upon the use of psychoactive drugs (chi square = 4.43; df = 2, P = .11). CONCLUSION: Restraints were not associated with a significantly lower risk of falls or injuries in subgroups of residents likely to be restrained. These findings support individualized assessment of fall risk rather than routine use of physical restraints for fall prevention. Researchers and clinicians should continue to focus efforts on developing a variety of approaches that reduce risk of falls and injuries and promote mobility rather than immobility.