Superficial swab versus deep-tissue biopsy for the microbiological diagnosis of local infection in advanced-stage pressure ulcers of spinal-cord-injured patients: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of superficial ulcer swab culture to make a microbiological diagnosis of deep wound infections in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients with advanced-stage pressure ulcers. METHODS: From July 2011 to February 2014, we performed a prospective, single-centre study on adult SCI patients undergoing scheduled surgical debridement and reconstruction for advanced-stage pressure ulcers, at Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, a 150-bed hospital dedicated to SCI care. Three superficial ulcer swabs were preoperatively collected using the Levine technique, then sent for culture. In surgery, multiple bone and soft-tissue specimens were taken and sent for culture and histological examination. No antibiotics were administered before surgery. The results of swabs and intraoperative specimens were compared. RESULTS: In all, 116 patients were included, median age 49 years; a majority were males with post-traumatic paraplegia. According to intraoperative specimen cultures, the most common micro-organisms were Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, found in 31, 27, and 16 cases, respectively. Concordance between superficial swabs and intraoperative specimen culture was found in only in 25 out of 116 cases (22%). The main reason for non-concordance was the yielding of different micro-organisms (41 out of 116); false negatives (swab negative/intraoperative positive) accounted for 31 out of 116 and false positives (swab positive/intraoperative negative) for 19 out of 116. When compared with intraoperative specimens, sensitivity and specificity of the swab culture were 80% and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that in patients with advanced-stage pressure ulcers, the cultures of a superficial ulcer swab are not useful in either the diagnosis of a superinfection or the prediction of the role of involved micro-organisms.

Validation of the Italian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) Self-Report.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. OBJECTIVES: To validate the Italian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (SCIM SR). SETTING: Two spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation facilities in Italy. METHODS: The SCIM III comprises items on 19 daily tasks, grouped into three subscales: 'Self-care,' 'Respiration and sphincter management' and 'Mobility'. The total SCIM score ranges between 0 and 100. The Italian self-reported version (SCIM SR) was translated from the German tool. We studied 116 patients on their first hospitalization for rehabilitation after an SCI. At the time of discharge, patients were evaluated by the rehabilitation team using the SCIM III and self-assessed their independence with regard to activities of daily living using the SCIM SR. Pearson's correlation, Bland-Altman method, and stratified and regression analyses were used to examine the differences between evaluations. RESULTS: On the basis of Pearson's correlation, there was good agreement between the data from the SCIM III and SCIM SR (r=0.918 for 'Self-care,' 0.806 for 'Respiration and sphincter management,' 0.906 for 'Mobility' and 0.934 for total scores). By Bland-Altman analysis, patients rated their functioning nearly the same as professionals-the mean difference between SCIM III and SCIM SR scores was approximately 0 for all subscales and total scores. The stratified and regression analyses failed to identify any specific factor that was associated with differences between SCIM III and SCIM SR scores. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the validity of the Italian version of the SCIM SR, which can facilitate longer-term evaluations of the independence of individuals with SCIs.