Now You Hear Me, Later You Don't: The Immediacy of Linguistic Computation and the Representation of Speech.

What happens to an acoustic signal after it enters the mind of a listener? Previous work has demonstrated that listeners maintain intermediate representations over time. However, the internal structure of such representations-be they the acoustic-phonetic signal or more general information about the probability of possible categories-remains underspecified. We present two experiments using a novel speaker-adaptation paradigm aimed at uncovering the format of speech representations. We exposed adult listeners (N = 297) to a speaker whose utterances contained acoustically ambiguous information concerning phones (and thus words), and we manipulated the temporal availability of disambiguating cues via visually presented text (presented before or after each utterance). Results from a traditional phoneme-categorization task showed that listeners adapted to a modified acoustic distribution when disambiguating text was provided before but not after the audio. These results support the position that speech representations consist of activation over categories and are inconsistent with direct maintenance of the acoustic-phonetic signal.

Miller's monkey updated: Communicative efficiency and the statistics of words in natural language.

Is language designed for communicative and functional efficiency? G. K. Zipf famously argued that shorter words are more frequent because they are easier to use, thereby resulting in the statistical law that bears his name. Yet, G. A. Miller showed that even a monkey randomly typing at a keyboard, and intermittently striking the space bar, would generate "words" with similar statistical properties. Recent quantitative analyses of human language lexicons (Piantadosi et al., 2012) have revived Zipf's functionalist hypothesis. Ambiguous words tend to be short, frequent, and easy to articulate in language production. Such statistical findings are commonly interpreted as evidence for pressure for efficiency, as the context of language use often provides cues to overcome lexical ambiguity. In this study, we update Miller's monkey thought experiment to incorporate empirically motivated phonological and semantic constraints on the creation of words. We claim that the appearance of communicative efficiency is a spandrel (Gould & Lewontin, 1979), as lexicons formed without the context of language use or reference to communication or efficiency exhibit comparable statistical properties. Furthermore, the updated monkey model provides a good fit for the growth trajectory of English as recorded in the Oxford English Dictionary. Focusing on the history of English words since 1900, we show that lexicons resulting from the monkey model provide a better embodiment of communicative efficiency than the actual lexicon of English. We conclude by arguing for the need to go beyond correlational statistics and to seek direct evidence for the mechanisms that underlie principles of language design.