Long-term patient-reported outcomes after anti-reflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia repair: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia who are candidates for surgery should be treated with minimally invasive partial or total fundoplication. As data on long-term clinical and functional outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for GERD are limited, the aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of fundoplication in terms of patient-reported symptoms and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use. METHODS: The data of 88 patients who underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery for GERD between January 2007 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes were investigated after surgery using a 13-items Likert-Scale questionnaire based on the frequency (events/week) and severity of typical and atypical symptoms, dysphagia, and dyspepsia. Furthermore, variations in the use of PPIs were investigated as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients participated in the questionnaire survey. The median follow-up duration was 77 (2-165) months. The postoperative rate of mild and severe typical symptoms was significantly lower than the preoperative rate (P<0.01). Similarly, the atypical symptom rates decreased after surgery (P<0.05). Dysphagia was more frequent after fundoplication (P<0.01). Before the anti-reflux surgery, 94.7% of the patients were prescribed a PPI. At the time of follow-up, this proportion had decreased to 73.7% (P<0.01). However, the PPI intake rate was 90.9% in the group of patients interviewed >10 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients, laparoscopic anti-reflux fundoplication reduced the rate typical and atypical symptoms of GERD. However, surgery appeared to have no impact on PPI intake over time.

Total neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic minireview.

Colorectal carcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and indeed, rectal cancer accounting for approximately one third of newly diagnosed patients. Gold standard in the treatment of rectal cancer is a multimodality approach, aiming at a good control of the local disease. Distant recurrences are the major cause of mortality. Currently, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC) patients undergo a combined treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, followed by surgery. Eventually, more chemotherapy, namely adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), may be necessary. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) is an emerging approach aimed to reduce distant metastases and improve local control. Several ongoing studies are analyzing whether this new approach could improve oncological outcomes. Published results were encouraging, but the heterogeneity of protocols in use, makes the comparison and interpretation of data rather complex. One of the major concerns regarding TNT administration is related to its effect on larger and more advanced cancers that might not undergo similar down-staging as smaller, early-stage tumors. This minireview, based on a systematic literature search of randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis, summarizes current knowledge on TNT. The aim was to confirm or refute whether or not current practice of TNT is based on relevant evidence, to establish the quality of that evidence, and to address any uncertainty or variation in practice that may be occurring. A tentative grouping of general study characteristics, clinical features and treatments characteristics has been undertaken to evaluate if the reported studies are sufficiently homogeneous in terms of subjects involved, interventions, and outcomes to provide a meaningful idea of which patients are more likely to gain from this treatment.

Robotic rectal resection preserves anorectal function: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Improving survival rates in rectal cancer patients has generated a growing interest in functional outcomes after total mesorectal excision (TME). The well-established low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score assesses postoperative anorectal impairment after TME. Our meta-analysis is the first to compare bowel function after open, laparoscopic, transanal, and robotic TME. METHODS: All studies reporting functional outcomes after rectal cancer surgery (LARS score) were included, and were compared with a consecutive series of robotic TME (n = 48). RESULTS: Thirty-two publications were identified, including 5 565 patients. Anorectal function recovered significantly better within one year after robotic TME (3.8 [95%CI -9.709-17.309]) versus laparoscopic TME (26.4 [95%CI 19.524-33.286]), p = 0.006), open TME (26.0 [95%CI 24.338-29.702], p = 0.002) and transanal TME (27.9 [95%CI 22.127-33.669], p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic TME enables better recovery of anorectal function compared to other techniques. Further prospective, high-quality studies are needed to confirm the benefits of robotic surgery.

Long-Term Results of a Prospective Phase 2 Study on Volume De-Escalation in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy of Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: In the current study, we evaluated whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with reduced treatment volumes due to the exclusion of elective pelvic nodal irradiation is a feasible strategy for selected patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with T2 low-lying/T3, N0-N1 rectal lesions without evidence of disease in the lateral lymph nodes were prospectively recruited. All patients underwent pretreatment testing, including computed tomography imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis with intravenous contrast, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging with intravenous contrast, and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography. The clinical target volume included the primary tumor and the mesorectum with vascular supply containing the perirectal and presacral nodes, with the upper border at the S2/S3 interspace. The total radiation dose was 50.4 Gy, and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was associated concomitantly. The primary endpoint of the study was the reduction of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and the secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response, local control, overall survival, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (30 men, 22 women) with a median age of 67 years (range, 45-85 years) were enrolled in the study. Acute grade 3 GI toxicity was 7.6%, and there were no cases of grade 4 toxicity. Three patients (5.7%) developed a local recurrence. No relapse occurred in the lateral lymph nodes. The local control rate at 5 years was 96.1%. With a median follow-up time of 72.9 months (range, 2.5-127.6 months), the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 89.4% and 87%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 82.4% and 82.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: De-escalation of radiation therapy target volume reduces GI side effects without compromising efficacy in patients with rectal cancer. These results cannot be clearly extended to high-risk disease and need further evaluation in future randomized trials.

How to do hernioscopy for incarcerated femoral hernia with laparoscopic O-ring retractor system.

Incarcerated groin hernia management often required emergency surgery. Hernioscopy is a safe alternative to repair hernia and explore intra-abdominal cavity. Alexis Laparoscope System is a useful device to perform hernioscopy.

Ileo-ileal intussusception caused by small bowel leiomyosarcoma: A rare case report.

INTRODUCTION: Intussusception is the telescoping of one segment of the bowel into an adjacent bowel segment, causing venous congestion, edema, and blood supply reduction. We present a case of ileo-ileal intussusception in an adult patient with intestinal obstruction caused by a rare mesenchymal malignant lesion of the distal ileum: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS). PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 90-year-old Caucasian man presented to the hospital with a two-day history of abdominal pain, nausea, and bowel occlusion. Preoperative Computer Tomography (CT) showed a solid mass with stratified walls in the lumen of the cecum with the classics "bulls-eye" appearance with concentric rings, suggestive of intussusception. The patient underwent emergency laparotomy with evidence of a small bowel wall tumor driving ileo-ileal intussusception with ischemic damage. Ileocecal resection was performed without postoperative complications. Histopathological examination showed a tumor on the muscular layer of the small bowel. The definitive diagnosis was LMS. DISCUSSION: Adult intussusception is a rare condition, with an incidence of 2/1 000 000 cases per year worldwide. About 60% of patients suffering from this disease require surgery. Clinical presentation can be non-specific because of its no characteristic signs and symptoms. The most common presenting symptom is abdominal pain with bowel obstruction sings. Intussusception can occur anywhere along the small and large intestine and it is typically associated with a Lead Point (LP). The LP may be benign or malignant conditions. Infrequent malignant causes include LMS. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of intussusception is relatively challenging because of its non-specific symptoms. CT scan is the examimation of choice for the diagnosis because of its peculiar images. In adults, surgical treatment is recommended with laparoscopic or open approach according to surgeon expertise, sometimes in an emergency setting.