[Lotus Sadra valve implantation complicated by type B aortic dissection: diagnosis and treatment]. / Impianto di Lotus Sadra complicato da dissezione aortica di tipo B: diagnosi e trattamento.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a validated technique for the treatment of aortic valve stenosis in patients with high surgical risk or inoperable. We present the case of an 80-year-old woman with severe aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient 55 mmHg), mild surgical risk, who refused traditional surgery. We implanted a Lotus Sadra 25 mm (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) via the transfemoral route. During pull back delivery, the patient experienced interscapular pain with angiographic evidence of type B aortic dissection effectively treated by implanting a vascular endoprosthesis Valiant 30 x 150 mm (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). Type B aortic dissection is a rare event during TAVI. The onset of procedural complications, often unpredictable, suggests the need for more extensive knowledge of materials and techniques, in particular with respect to endovascular treatment of the aortic and iliac-femoral district.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Multicenter Italian Experience.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is still challenging. In this setting, the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) seems attractive because it allows drug delivery combined with transient vessel scaffolding. We aimed to investigate the long-term results after BVS use in ISR lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with BVS implantation for ISR at 7 Italian Centers. Primary end point was the device-oriented composite end point (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at the longest follow-up available. From April 2012 to June 2014, 116 patients (127 lesions) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for ISR with BVS implantation. Among the ISR lesions, the majority were drug-eluting stent ISR (78, 61.6%), de novo ISR (92, 72.4%), and diffuse ISR (81, 63.8%). Procedural success was achieved for all (100%) patients. No in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization occurred. At 15 months of follow-up, the incidence of the device-oriented composite end point estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method was 9.1%. No significant differences were reported between drug-eluting stent and bare-metal stent ISR groups in terms of device-oriented composite end point (10.9% versus 6.4%; hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-6.5; P=0.425) and its singular components (cardiac death: 2.8% versus 2.0%, hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-14.1, P=0.843; target vessel myocardial infarction: 1.5% versus 0%, P=0.421; ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization: 9.6% versus 4.4%, hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-10.8, P=0.309). CONCLUSIONS: Our registry suggests that the use of BVS implantation for the treatment of complex drug-eluting stent and bare-metal stent ISR lesions might be associated with acceptable long-term clinical outcomes.

Bioabsorbable drug-eluting vascular scaffold for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: A two center registry.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) is a clinical problem for which a satisfactory solution has not been found yet. Bioabsorbable drug eluting vascular scaffolds (BVSs) provide transient vessel scaffolding combined with prolonged drug delivery capability. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of BVS for the treatment of coronary ISR. METHODS/MATERIALS: Between January 2013 and June 2013, 27 patients (31 lesions), presenting with either stable or unstable angina due to coronary ISR, were enrolled in a single arm, prospective, open label registry. Primary end point was the occurrence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months. Secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction and TVR at 12 months. RESULTS: A diffuse ISR pattern was present in 70% of the lesions; mean lesion length was 34.6±15. BVS was successfully implanted in all patients with no in hospital MACE. At twelve months of follow up, MACE rate was 18.5%. One patient died for non-cardiac reason, one patient died due to a possible stent thrombosis and TVR was necessary in 3 patients (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that BVS is safe and technically feasible for treatment of long and diffuse coronary ISR. These data could be considered hypothesis generator for a randomized clinical trial.