Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 88(5): 428-433, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28929609

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Royal College of Anaesthetists published the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) to describe and compare inpatient care and outcomes of major emergency abdominal surgery in England and Wales in 2015 and 2016. The purpose of this article is to compare emergency abdominal surgical care and mortality in a regional hospital (Logan Hospital, Queensland, Australia) with NELA results. METHODS: Data were extracted from two databases. All deaths from May 2010 to April 2015 were reviewed and patients who had an emergency abdominal operation within 30 days of death were identified. The health records of all patients who underwent abdominal surgery were extracted and those who had an emergency laparotomy were identified for analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty patients underwent emergency laparotomy and were included in the analysis. The total 30-day mortality during this 5-year period was 9.7%. Factors affecting mortality included age, Portsmouth-Physiological and Operative Severity Score (P-POSSUM) and admission source. Timing of antibiotic administration, use of perioperative medical service and frequency of intensive care admission were the same in patients who died and survived. CONCLUSION: Mortality in patients following emergency laparotomy at Logan Hospital compares favourably with 11.1% reported by NELA. This may be partly attributable to case mix distribution as for each P-POSSUM risk Logan Hospital mortality was at the upper end of that reported by NELA. Further Australia data are required. Improved compliance with NELA recommendations may improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Emergency Medical Services , Laparotomy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia , Child , Clinical Audit , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 3(6): e436, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26180737

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Punching glass can cause severe and debilitating injuries. The literature is scant in regards to the injury patterns, optimal management, and preventative strategies. We have reviewed our experience of these injuries at a regional Australian hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who had punched glass and presented to Cairns Base Hospital between January 2003 and December 2012. Data collected included age, gender, marital status, employment status, alcohol consumption, side of injury, intent, time of presentation, damaged structures, treatment required, operative time, total hospital stay, and required follow-up. RESULTS: 137 eligible patients were identified during the 10-year study period. Mean age was 26.3 years. Most were men (n = 113), single (n = 122), unemployed (n = 95), and intoxicated (n = 91). Most of these injuries presented outside of normal working hours (P < 0.001). Ninety-one patients had superficial skin lacerations only and did not require operative intervention. The remaining 46 patients had a total of 46 tendon, 18 muscle, 12 nerve, 8 vessel and 5 bone injuries, and all required operative intervention. Tendon, nerve and vessel injuries were strongly associated with each other (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This represents the largest case series of glass punching injuries in the English literature. Punching glass can cause significant morbidity in a young age group and is therefore a major public health concern. Thorough physical examination, appropriate imaging and operative repair can improve outcomes. Preventative measures such as stricter legislation and safety glass will reduce the burden of these injures on the individual and healthcare system in Australia.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...