Risk factors and outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Retrospective study of 75 single center cases.

OBJECTIVE: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical gold standard in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Results are generally satisfactory but there is a significant rate of patients who experience postoperative complications. The aims of our study were to identify the pre- and intraoperative risk factors and their correlation with the reported outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the medical records of all consecutive patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA for UC in our center from 2010 to 2021. Pre- and intraoperative factors were examined and correlated with pouchitis, endoscopic pouchitis, pouch failure, anastomotic leak, postoperative complications classified according to Clavien-Dindo score and stoma outlet obstruction. A univariate and multivariate statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Out of 75 patients undergoing 3- or 2-stage IPAA surgery, the coexistence of extraintestinal clinical manifestations and preoperative topical rectal stump therapy for active proctitis were significantly associated with the occurrence of pouchitis (OR=4.4, p=0.03 and OR=7.6, p=0.01). Endoscopic pouchitis was found to be related to preoperative topical rectal therapy (OR=10.2, p=0.007), but not to extraintestinal manifestations of disease. Anastomotic leak was found to be significantly related to pouch failure (OR=22.7, p=0.007). Surgical indication for malignancy increased the risk for early complications (Clavien-Dindo >2) (OR=16.0, p=0.04). Young age was associated with the occurrence of outlet stoma obstruction in patients with recent IPAA surgery (OR=0.97, p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on observed results, an appropriate preoperative patient assessment aimed at detecting specific risk factors is crucial to identify early or prevent worse outcomes in patients undergoing IPAA surgery.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on IBD surgery: a single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: The spread of COVID-19 pandemic forced the national healthcare system to reorganize almost all surgical services, in order to maintain an adequate therapeutic offer. At General Surgery department of Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli in Rome, surgical procedures were progressively reduced to provide beds and personnel for COVID-19. The aim of our study was to analyze the effect of one year of COVID-19 pandemic on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) surgery in a cohort of patients and evaluate post-operative short-term complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our team retrospectively analyzed the records of IBD patients who were referred to an IBD-related resective surgery from January 2020 to December 2020. These patients were compared to a comparable group of IBD patients who were operated from January 2019 to December 2019. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included in the study. Median age was 44 (range 15-77). Patients were referred for Ulcerative colitis (23.1%) and Crohn's disease (76.9%). Eighty-three patients underwent surgery from January 2020 to December 2020, which constitutes a 4.6% increase in the number of patients compared to the same period in 2019. Median post-operative hospital stay increased (7 days in 2019 vs. 6 days in 2020). Laparoscopic was the most frequently performed procedure during both periods (49% in 2019 and 59% in 2020). Complication rates, reported as Clavien-Dindo score 3 or 4, slightly decreased in 2020 (6.5 in 2019 vs. 4.8 in 2020). PCR test for detection of COVID-19 infection was conducted in all the patients before the hospitalization. Two patients out of 70 were tested positive for COVID-19 and their surgeries were rescheduled. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant reduction in IBD resective surgeries at our center in 2020, nor a deterioration of the outcomes. A reduction of other elective surgical procedures had to be carried out and adequate protective measures for both patients and healthcare workers were established.

New perspectives in the prediction of postoperative complications for high-risk ulcerative colitis patients: machine learning preliminary approach.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute severe and medical refractory ulcerative colitis have a high risk of postoperative complications after total abdominal colectomy (TAC). The objective of this retrospective study is to use machine learning to analyze and predict short-term outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 32 patients with ulcerative colitis were treated with total abdominal colectomy between 2011 and 2017. Biographical data, preoperative therapy, blood chemistry, nutritional status, surgical technique, blood transfusion and preoperative length of stay were the features selected for the statistical analyses and were used as input for the machine learning algorithms to predict the rate of complications. RESULTS: Traditional statistical analysis showed an overall postoperative morbidity rate of 34% and a mortality rate of 3%. Preoperative low serum albumin levels (<2.5 g/dL) were related to a higher risk of minor infectious complications with statistical significance (p<0.05). Preoperative length of stay (>4 days), blood transfusions (≥1 unit) and body temperature (≥37.5°C) demonstrated a major impact on infectious morbidity with statistical significance (p<0.05). Patients treated with steroids and rescue therapy presented a higher risk of minor infectious complications (p<0.05). Evaluating only preoperative features, machine learning algorithms were able to predict minor postoperative complications with a high strike rate (84.3%), high sensitivity (87.5%) and high specificity (83.3%) during the testing phase. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning is demonstrated to be useful in predicting the rate of minor postoperative complications in high-risk ulcerative colitis patients, despite the small sample size. It represents a major step forward in data analysis by implementing a retrospective study from a prospective point of view.

Does CD10 expression individuate a GIST subgroup of patients?

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate expression of CD10 in a series of gastrointestinal tumors (GIST) and to find its relationship with prognosis, biological and clinical behavior. GISTs represent the most frequent gastrointestinal (GI) mesenchymal tumors. Biological behavior of GIST cannot be easily predicted; for this reason many biomolecular factors are being investigated to predict prognosis. Recently the role of the CD10 as prognostic predictor in the carcinogenesis of the gastrointestinal carcinomas has been accurately studied. To our knowledge, no data regarding the role of CD10 in GISTs have been published to date. METHODS: CD10 expression was searched by immunohistochemistry in 29 histological specimens of proved GIST surgically treated. Patients' characteristics and all pathologic features of tumors were statistically reviewed and compared to CD10 expression. Survival analysis was also calculated respect to CD10 expression and relevant clinical or pathological features. RESULTS: CD10 was expressed in 24.1% of cases. There was no correlation between CD10 positivity and risk category, morphology, size or mitosis. The CD10 expression status did not prove to be statistically related to worse prognosis, advanced disease (metastasis) or recurrence, however it was significantly correlated to the tumor site. CONCLUSION: CD10 expression in our series seems to be associated to a small bowel origin of tumor. CD10 expression alone failed to reveal a statistically significant prognostic value. However survival analysis revealed worse prognosis in stomach tumours with mitotic count >10/50 HPF.

Complications related to hyperthermia during hypertermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemiotherapy (HIPEC) treatment. Do they exist?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hyperthermia, either alone or in combination with anticancer drugs, is becoming more and more a clinical reality for the treatment of far advanced gastrointestinal cancers, acting as a cytotoxic agent at a temperature between 40-42.5 degrees C. Although hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is demonstrated to have some benefit in selected patients with peritoneal seeding, there are not enough data on the risk of damage of normal tissue that increases as the temperature rises, with possible serious and, sometimes, lethal complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched on medline words like "intraoperative intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia and morbidity", focusing our attention on studies (published since 1990) which reported morbidity as bowel obstruction, bowel perforation or anastomic leak, during intraoperative intraoperitoneal chemotherapy in hyperthermia (HIPEC). RESULTS: Heat acts increasing cancer cell killing after exposure to ionizing radiation, inhibiting repairing processes of radiation-induced DNA lesions (radiosensitization), and also sensitizing cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs, particularly to alkylating agents (chemosensitization). The peritoneal carcinomatosis (a frequent evolution of advanced digestive cancer) represents one of the main indication to hypertermic treatment. In the last fifteen years, in fact, different methods were developed for the surgery treatment (peritonectomy) and for loco-regional chemotherapic treatment of the carcinomatosis (intraperitoneal intra/post-operative iper/normothermic chemotherapy) to act directly on neoplastic seeding. We found, as result of different studies, 9 articles, written about perforation after HIPEC. CONCLUSION: The aim of the present study is to present the review of the literature in terms of peri-operative complications related to the hyperthermia during intraoperative chemohyperthermia procedure.

[Pancreatic fistula after left pancreatectomy. Risk factors analysis on 68 patients]. / La fistola pancreatica dopo pancreasectomia sinistra. Analisi dei fattori di rischio su 68 casi.

AIM: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors related to pancreatic fistula after left pancreatectomy, considering the difference between the use of mechanical suture and the manual suture to close the pancreatic stump. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients, undergoing left pancreatectomy, were included in this study during a 10-year period. Eight possible risk factors related to pancreatic fistula were examined, such as demographic data (age and sex), pathology (pancreatic and extrapancreatic), technical characteristics (stump closure, concomitant splenectomy, additional procedures), texture of pancreatic parenchyma, octreotide therapy. RESULTS: Fourty-one patients (60%) underwent left pancreatectomy for primary pancreatic disease and 27 (40%) for extrapancreatic malignancy. Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 1.5% and 35%, respectively. Fourteen patients (20%) developed pancreatic fistula: 4 of them were classified as Grade A, 9 as Grade B and only one as Grade C. Three factors have been significantly associated to the incidence of pancreatic fistula: none prophylactic octreotide therapy, spleen preserving and soft pancreatic texture. It's still unclear the influence of pancreatic stump closure (stapler vs hand closure) in the onset of pancreatic fistula. CONCLUSION: In this study the incidence of pancreatic fistula after left pancreatectomy has been 20%. This rate is lower for patients with fibrotic pancreatic tissue, concomitant splenectomy and postoperative prophylactic octreotide therapy.

Severe prolonged gastroparesis after cytoreductive surgery in an advanced ovarian cancer patient.

Number and type of complications after ovarian cancer surgery can vary greatly according to both the patient's characteristics, and the extension and type of surgery. Current literature lacks in mentioning specific gastrointestinal side effects, which could be evidenced during the early postoperative course of patients submitted to major gynecological oncologic surgery. A severe gastroparesis prolonged for 2 months after cytoreductive surgery in an advanced ovarian cancer patient was successfully treated with conservative multidrug therapy. Gastroparesis has to be enumerated as a rare but possible event after major gynecological oncologic surgery. A conservative management involving decompressive nasogastric tube, nutritional support, antiemetic drugs, prokinetic drugs is suggested, while surgical therapy is only recommended in a very small subset of unmanageable patients.

Posterior laparostomy through the bed of the 12th rib to drain retroperitoneal infection after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal perforation occurs in 0.4-1 per cent of endoscopic procedures. The best therapeutic approach for periampullary injury is controversial; initially the treatment is generally conservative, but sometimes large retroperitoneal infections develop that require surgery. METHODS: Six patients with an extensive retroperitoneal collection and unstable sepsis as a consequence of periampullary duodenal perforation sustained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were treated by right posterior laparostomy through the bed of the 12th rib. RESULTS: The sepsis was managed effectively by an open posterior approach, resulting in spontaneous closure of the duodenal leak after a mean(s.d.) of 14.5(5.2) days. No hospital death or major complication was recorded. Late incisional hernia developed in one patient. CONCLUSION: The technique of posterior laparostomy through the bed of the 12th rib provided adequate debridement and drainage of upper and lower parts of the retroperitoneal space involved by infection following periampullary duodenal perforation. Good control of retroperitoneal sepsis and duodenal secretions resulted in spontaneous closure of the duodenal leak, avoiding the need for more complex intra-abdominal procedures.

Avoiding early postoperative complications in liver surgery. A multivariate analysis of 254 patients consecutively observed.

BACKGROUND: The number of hepatic resections for benign and malignant lesions has constantly increased over the past 20 years, as a consequence, surgical experience acquired over the past few years has decreased post-operative morbidity and mortality rates. AIMS: Analysing the relation between potential preoperative risk factors and the occurrence of severe post-operative complications, an attempt is made to identify the variables determining surgical risk in elective hepatic surgery both in normal and cirrhotic liver. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The hospital records of 254 patients who underwent elective liver surgical procedures for hepatic lesions in our department, between 1984 and 1999, were reviewed. The following variables were entered into univariate and multivariate analysis: age, sex, nature of liver lesion (benign or malignant), presence of cirrhosis or cholestasis, synchronous resection of other organs, disorders of blood coagulation, intraoperative blood requirement, the extent of surgical procedures and Pringle's manoeuvre. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The multivariate analysis of the 254 surgical operations on the liver indicates that the most powerful independent predictors favouring a serious adverse effect includes intra-operative blood transfusions, advanced age and cirrhosis. Scrupulous preoperative clinical evaluation and expert surgical skills minimize intra-operative bleeding and proved to be the most significant factors influencing morbidity and mortality rates.

Proximal compared with distal gastric cancer: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

The major determinants of the poor prognosis of the patients with proximal-third gastric cancer (proximal gastric cancer or PGC) when compared with that of patients with more distally located gastric tumors (distal gastric cancer or DGC) rely both on the more advanced age and tumor stage at the moment of clinical presentation and on the higher postoperative mortality for PGC patients. We reviewed hospital records of 707 patients with gastric cancer (187 with PGC and 520 with DGC) observed during the period 1981 through 1996 at the same surgical unit. Demographic and pathological data, type of treatment, and hospital morbidity and mortality rates were recorded. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was used to calculate the 5-year survival probabilities with respect to the following clinical and pathological variables: age, sex, gross appearance according to Borrmann classification, histological type according to Lauren, stage of the disease, tumor location, and type of treatment. PGC was associated with more advanced tumor stage (P < 0.0001), older age (P = 0.039), and higher necessity of extended surgery (P < 0.0001) when compared with DGC. Hospital mortality was 9.6 and 5 per cent in PGC and DGC patients respectively (P = 0.033). Overall 5-year survival was 17.7 and 36.4 per cent in PGC and DGC patients (P < 0.0001): 35.9 versus 57.6% (P = 0.0001) and 3.7 versus 7.6 per cent (P = 0.03) after radical and palliative surgery respectively. At multivariate survival analysis proximal location was found to be independently associated (P = 0.0007) with poor survival. The multivariate model shows the proximal location as an independent predictor of lesser favorable outcome in gastric cancer. The major determinants of the poor prognosis of PGC with respect to DGC rely both on the more advanced age and tumor stage at the moment of clinical presentation and on the higher postoperative morbidity for PGC patients.

[Role of lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinoma]. / Ruolo della linfoadenectomia nel carcinoma gastrico.

Controversy still surrounds the value of extensive regional lymphnode dissection in the treatment of gastric cancer. The aim of the present paper is to give this topic a contribution through the review of the literature and the analysis of personal results.

Surgery: independent prognostic factor in curable and far advanced gastric cancer.

The hospital records of 639 patients affected by primary gastric cancer who were consecutively admitted to our unit during the period 1981-1995 were reviewed. Overall 220 underwent total gastrectomy (38 palliative), 12 had resection of the gastric stump, 195 had distal subtotal gastrectomy (55 palliative), 78 had bypass procedures, 72 had explorative laparotomy, and 62 had no operation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate 5-year survival with respect to the main clinical, pathologic, and treatment variables after both curative and palliative treatments. Overall the 5-year survival after curative treatment (320 patients-operative mortality excluded) was 55.5%: 91.1% for stage IA, 71.5% IB, 62.4% II, 37.5% IIIA, 31.5% IIIB. Among patients who underwent palliative treatment 5-year survival was 13.1% after gastric resection (total or distal subtotal), 4.9% after the bypass procedures, 0 after explorative laparotomy, and 0 after no operation. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses showed that variables independently associated with poor survival were advanced stage, upper location and D1 lymphadenectomy after curative treatment, tumor spread to distant sites, and nonresectional surgery after palliative treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that even though survival with gastric cancer depends on predetermined factors, the type of surgery can have a significant effect on prognosis after both curative and palliative treatment.

Pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer has been proposed to remove lymph nodes along the upper border of the pancreas without performing a distal pancreatic resection. However, the original technique includes the ligation of the splenic artery at its origin and thus carries the risk of pancreatic necrosis. HYPOTHESIS: A technique of pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy that includes ligation of the splenic artery approximately 5 cm distally from the root may reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic necrosis. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Both primary and referral hospital care. PATIENTS: Hospital records of 228 consecutive patients who, according to a personal technique, underwent D3 pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 1981 to 1997 were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical complications, postoperative deaths, and survival. RESULTS: Hospital morbidity and mortality were 33.3% and 3.9%, respectively. No patients experienced pancreatic necrosis. The 5-year survival rate after curative resection was 53.6%: 96.9% for stage IA, 76.3% for stage IB, 63.0% for stage II, 35.6% for stage IIIA, 27.0% for stage IIIB, and 20.3% for stage IV (N3-positive patients) disease. CONCLUSION: Results of the present study show the efficacy of this method of radical resection for gastric cancer as demonstrated by the low incidence of postoperative complications and high survival rates.

Primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: results of aggressive surgical treatment.

A retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate the results of surgical treatment in a series of patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcomas consecutively treated by the same surgical team. The hospital records of 42 patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcomas who underwent surgical exploration at our unit from 1984 to 1995 were reviewed. A univariate analysis was used to identify the main clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors affecting long-term survival. Twenty-five patients (59.6%) underwent radical surgery. The 5-year survival and 5-year disease-free survival after radical resection were 48.1% and 38.8%, respectively. According to the univariate analysis of survival tumor classification (T), stage and gross surgical margins significantly affected prognosis. The study indicates that even though there are predetermined and unmodifiable tumor-related factors, such as tumor classification (T) and stage, that influence survival in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas, wide surgical excision offers a concrete chance for long-term survival.

Survival in early gastric cancer: multivariate analysis on 72 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Few reports from the Western hemisphere have investigated the impact of pathological features and surgical modalities on the prognosis of patients affected by early gastric cancer (EGC). In particular, the extent of lymphadenectomy (limited vs. extended) and the type of gastric resection (subtotal vs. total) remain controversial issues in the management of EGC. The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing prognosis in patients affected by EGC. METHODOLOGY: Hospital records and pathological specimens of 72 patients with EGC undergoing resective surgery during the period 1981-1995 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient status was determined by follow-up examination or by telephone contact. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to calculate the 5-year survival probabilities with respect to the following variables: age (< or = 65, > 65), sex, depth of invasion (mucosal, submucosal) tumor location (upper, middle and lower third), gross appearance (type I, type II and type III), size (< or = 1.5 cm, > 1.5 cm), presence or absence of lymph node metastasis, histological type (intestinal, diffuse), extent of lymphadenectomy (limited or extended), and type of gastrectomy (total or distal subtotal). Survival was the outcome variable studied. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, nodal involvement and depth of invasion were independently associated with poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed a significant dominance of host- and tumor-related factors over the type of surgical procedure on prognosis of EGC patients.

Palliative surgery for far-advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study on 305 consecutive patients.

Few reports of the Western countries have investigated the value of palliative surgery for stomach cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of palliative surgery in a large series of patients affected by gastric carcinoma, consecutively treated by the same surgical team. The hospital records of 305 patients affected by gastric cancer who did not undergo surgical treatment or who underwent a palliative surgical procedure at our unit between 1981 and 1995 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to calculate the 5-year survival probabilities with respect to the following variables: demographic data, tumor location and gross appearance, spread of the disease, histological type according to P. Lauren, and type of treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that resectional surgery and tumor spread limited to local sites were independently associated with better survival. The study indicates that even though there are host-related factors that govern survival in far-advanced stomach cancer, the type of surgery can have a significant effect on prognosis; resectional surgery should be undertaken whenever possible in such patients.

[Surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma: lymphadenectomy]. / Trattamento chirurgico del carcinoma gastrico: la linfoadenectomia.

The review of the literature shows the improvement of outcome of patients with gastric cancer after resection and extended lymphadenectomy. Lymphadenectomy D2/D3 was performed in 206 out of 639 patients with gastric cancer: 5-year survival was 66.3% versus 41.5% of the 121 patients that underwent D1 resection (p < 0.0001). Univariate and multivariate analyses show that proximal location of the cancer, advanced stage and lymphadenectomy limited to perigastric stations are negative prognostic factors. Although there are still different opinions regarding D2 or D3 lymphadenectomies for the operative risks, pancreatic resection (preferring pancreas sparing techniques) and splenectomy is subtotal gastrectomy for antral carcinoma, extended lymphadenectomy remains an important point to improve survival.