Robotic cold ischemia achieves comparable functional outcomes to open cold ischemia during partial nephrectomy for complex kidney tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the perioperative and functional outcomes after open and robotic partial nephrectomy performed with cold ischemia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed of consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy with renal hypothermia between January 2011 and September 2016. The study cohort included both open (Open Cold Ischemia, OCI; n=170) and robotic (Robotic Cold Ischemia, RCI; n=31) patients with complex renal masses (R.E.N.A.L. score >7) who did not meet exclusion criteria. A modified intracorporeal technique 1 was utilized for the introduction of ice slush at the time of hilar clamping in the RCI group. Statistical testing was performed to compare key perioperative and functional outcomes after ensuring equilibration of both groups by clinicodemographic criteria. RESULTS: Both groups were statistically equivalent with respect to baseline characteristics. Median GFR preservation postoperatively was 86.7% for the open group and 86.6% in the robotic group (p=0.49). Cold ischemia time (CIT) in the open group was 35 minutes compared to 28 minutes (p = 0.03) in the robotic group. LOS was significantly shorter by 2 days (p < 0.01) in the robotic group. Positive margins was noted to be 17 (10%) in the open group and 2 (6.5%) patients in the robotic group (p=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate an effective and simplified method of intracorporeal ice cooling during robotic partial nephrectomy. Our data suggests that results with this approach compare favorably to open cold ischemia technique. Intracorporeal ice cooling can be considered when performing complex partial nephrectomies with ischemia times expected to exceed 25 minutes.

Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Augmentation Ileocystoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Augmentation ileocystoplasty is a common treatment in adults with low capacity bladders due to neurogenic bladder dysfunction. We describe here our technique for robotic assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty in an adult with a low capacity bladder due to neurogenic bladder dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient is a 35 years-old man with neurogenic bladder due to a C6 spinal cord injury in 2004. Cystometrogram shows a maximum capacity of 96cc and Pdet at maximum capacity of 97cmH2O. He manages his bladder with intermittent catheterization and experiences multiple episodes of incontinence between catheterizations. He experiences severe autonomic dysreflexia symptoms with indwelling urethral catheter. He has previously failed non operative management options of his bladder dysfunction. Our surgical technique utilizes 6 trocars, of note a 12mm assistant trocar is placed 1cm superior to the pubic symphysis, and this trocar is solely used to pass a laparoscopic stapler to facilitate the excision of the ileal segment and the enteric anastomosis. Surgical steps include: development of the space of Retzius/dropping the bladder; opening the bladder from the anterior to posterior bladder neck; excision of a segment of ileum; enteric anastomosis; detubularizing the ileal segment; suturing the ileal segment to the incised bladder edge. RESULTS: The surgery had no intraoperative complications. Operative time was 286 minutes (4.8 hours). Estimated blood loss was 50cc. Length of hospital stay was 8 days. He did experience a postoperative complication on hospital day 3 of hematemesis, which did not require blood transfusion. Cystometrogram at 22 days post operatively showed a maximum bladder capacity of 165cc with a Pdet at maximum capacity of 10cmH2O. CONCLUSIONS: As surgeon comfort and experience with robotic assisted surgery grows, robotic surgery can successfully be applied to less frequently performed procedures. In this case we successfully performed a robotic assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty displaying improvement in measurable functional outcomes.

Robotic Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion for a Kidney Transplant Recipient.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is an alternative to open radical cystectomy. As experience is gained with the RARC approach the technique is being applied to more complex surgical cases. We describe here our technique for RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for a renal transplant recipient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient is a 60-year old man with high-grade muscle invasive bladder cancer. He has a history of renal failure due to polycystic kidney disease and received a deceased donor renal transplant in 2008. His hospital course at time of transplant was complicated by low-level BK virus viremia. Interestingly his trans-urethral bladder tumor resection specimen at time of bladder cancer diagnosis stained positive for SV40. His native kidneys were anuric so bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed in a staged fashion 2 weeks prior to RARC. Our surgical technique utilizes 6 trocars, of note a 12-mm assistant trocar is placed 1 cm superior to the pubic symphysis, and this trocar is solely used to pass a laparoscopic stapler to facilitate the excision of the ileal segment and the stapled enteric anastomosis. Surgical steps include: identification of native ureters bilaterally (removed en bloc with the bladder specimen); identification of the transplanted ureter at the right bladder dome; posterior bladder and prostate dissection along Denonvilliers' fascia; development of the space of Retzius; ligation and transection of the bladder and prostate vascular bundles; apical prostate dissection and transection of urethra; left pelvic lymphadenectomy; ilium resection for creation of the ileal conduit; stapled enteric anastomosis; ureteroileal anastomosis; maturation of the ileal conduit stoma. RESULTS: The surgery had no intraoperative complications. Operative time was 443 minutes (7.4 hours). Estimated blood loss was 250 cc. Length of hospital stay was 5 days. The patient did not experience any postoperative complications. The patient maintained good renal graft function with no decline in eGFR to date. CONCLUSIONS: As surgeon comfort and experience with robotic assisted surgery grows, robotic surgery can successfully be applied to less frequently performed procedures. Here we successfully performed a robotic assisted radical cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for a renal transplant recipient.

Cryoablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b Renal Tumors: A Matched Group Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The traditional treatment for a cT1b renal tumor has been radical nephrectomy. However, recent guidelines have shifted towards partial nephrectomy (PN) in selected patients with cT1b renal tumors. Furthermore, practitioners have extended the role of cryoablation (CA) to treat cT1b tumors in selected patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of CA compared to PN for cT1b renal tumors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent either renal CA (laparoscopic or percutaneous) or PN (robot-assisted) for a cT1b renal mass (>4cm and ≤7cm) between November 1999 and August 2014. To reduce the inherent biases of a retrospective study, CA and PN groups were matched on the basis of key variables: tumor size, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, preoperative serum creatinine, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), gender, and solitary kidney. The matching algorithm was 1:1 genetic matching with no replacement. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Survival analysis was performed only for patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma according to histopathologic evaluation of a tumor biopsy or resected tumor specimen. Recurrence-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Survival outcomes were compared between groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 31 patients were treated using CA and 161 using PN during the study period. After matching, there was no significant difference between the PN and CA groups for tumor size (4.6 vs 4.3cm; p=0.076), CCI (6 vs 6; p=0.3), RENAL score (9 vs 8; p=0.1), age (68 vs 68 yr; p=0.9), BMI (30 vs 31kg/m2; p=0.2), ASA score (3 vs 3; p=0.3), preoperative creatinine (1.2 vs 1.4mg/dl; p=0.2), preoperative eGFR (63 vs 53ml/min/1.73 m2; p=0.2), and proportion of patients with a solitary kidney (19% vs 32%; p=0.4). The total postoperative complication rate was higher for PN than for CA (42% vs 23%; p=0.10). There was no significant difference in percentage eGFR preservation between PN and CA (89% vs 93%; p=0.5). The rate of local recurrence was significantly higher for CA than for PN (p=0.019). There was no significant difference in cancer-specific mortality (p=0.5) or overall mortality (p=0.15) between the CA and PN groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with CA for cT1b renal tumors had a significantly higher rate of local cancer recurrence at 1 yr compared to those treated with PN. Until further studies are performed to clearly define the role of CA in cT1b renal tumors, CA should be reserved for patients with imperative indications for nephron-sparing surgery who cannot be subjected to the risks of more invasive PN. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated the efficacy of renal cryoablation compared to partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b renal tumors. The cryoablation and partial nephrectomy groups were matched to provide a better comparison. We concluded that renal cryoablation had a higher rate of local cancer recurrence.

Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors larger than 7 cm: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To compare perioperative outcomes between robotic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy for localized >7 cm tumors. METHODS: We identified patients in our institutional review boards approved database who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy or open partial nephrectomy for treatment of renal tumors >7 cm in size between January 2009 and August 2015. The operative-postoperative outcomes and complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: The number of patients with >7 cm renal tumors treated at our center with robotic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy were 54 and 56, respectively. Patients' demographics and tumor characteristics were similar between groups. Likewise, there were no significant difference between the groups in duration of operation, positive surgical margin rates and incidence of malignant disease rates. Median ischemia time was lower in robotic partial nephrectomy group (31.5 vs. 35 min., p = 0.02). Patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy had significantly lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates (9.4 vs. 30.4 %, p = 0.008) and shorter length of hospital stay (3.5 vs. 5.3 days, p < 0.001). The incidence of overall complications (robotic arm, 18.5 % vs. open arm, 28.6 %, p = 0.26) and major complications (robotic arm, 3.7 % vs. open arm, 12.5 %, p = 0.16) was comparable between the two groups. The readmission rate within 30-days after discharge was higher in open partial nephrectomy group (p = 0.03). There was no difference in the median percentage estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation and chronic kidney disease upstaging between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Localized renal tumors >7 cm and amenable to partial nephrectomy can be considered suitable for robotic approach.

Robot-assisted approach improves surgical outcomes in obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of approach on surgical outcomes in otherwise healthy obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using our institutional partial nephrectomy database, we abstracted data on otherwise healthy (Charlson comorbidity score ≤1 and bilateral kidneys), obese patients (body mass index >30 kg/m2 ) with small renal masses (<4 cm) treated between 2011 and 2015. The primary outcomes were intra-operative transfusion, operating time, length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. The association between approach, open (OPN) vs robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and outcomes was assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Covariates included age, gender, obesity severity, tumour size and tumour complexity. RESULTS: Of 237 obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, 25% underwent OPN and 75% underwent RAPN. Apart from larger tumour size in the OPN group (2.8 vs 2.5 cm; P = 0.02), there was no significant difference between groups. The rate of intra-operative blood transfusion (1.1 vs 10%; P = 0.01), the median operating time (180 vs 207 min; P < 0.01) and the median ischaemia time (19.5 vs 27 min; P < 0.01) were all greater for OPN. The LOS was significantly shorter for RAPN (3 vs 4 days; P < 0.01). While the overall complication rate was higher for OPN (15.8 vs 31.7%; P < 0.01), major complications were not significantly different (5.6 vs 1.7%; P = 0.20). On multivariable analyses, OPN independently predicted longer operating time, longer length of stay, and more overall complications. CONCLUSIONS: At a high-volume centre, the robot-assisted approach offers less blood transfusion, shorter operating time, faster recovery, and fewer peri-operative complications compared with the open approach in obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. In this setting, RAPN may be a preferable treatment option.

Non-modifiable factors predict discharge quality after robotic partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: To identify predictors of poor discharge quality after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) at a large academic center. METHODS: We queried our institutional RPN database for consecutive patients treated between 2011 and 2015. The primary outcome was poor discharge quality, defined as length of stay >3 days and/or unplanned readmission. The association between patient, disease, and provider factors and overall discharge quality was assessed using univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 791 cases, 219 (27.7 %) had poor discharge quality. On univariate analysis, factors associated with poor discharge quality were older age (p < .01), black race (p = .01), social insurance (p < .01), higher ASA score (p < .01), chronic kidney disease (p < .01), increased tumor size (p < .01), and higher tumor complexity (p = .01). Surgeon case volume did not predict discharge quality (p = .63). After adjustment for covariates on multivariable analysis, race (p = .01), ASA (p = .02), CKD (p < .01), tumor size (p = .02), and tumor complexity (p = .03) still predicted poor discharge quality. In particular, the odds of poor discharge quality were highest in the setting of CKD (OR 2.62, 95 % CI 1.72-4.01), black race (OR 2.17, 95 % CI 1.32-3.57), and higher ASA (OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.07-2.08). CONCLUSIONS: Non-modifiable patient and disease factors predict poor discharge quality after RPN. Risk adjustment for these factors will be important for determining future reimbursement for RPN providers.

Is Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Safe for T3a Renal Cell Carcinoma? Experience of a High-Volume Center.

PURPOSE: To compare the oncological and functional outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) with radical nephrectomy (RN) in renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) cases with pT3a staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of our IRB-approved nephrectomy database from 2005 to 2015 was performed. RPN and RN cases with confirmed RCC and pT3a staging were matched. Preoperative variables, functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between the groups, as well as Kaplan-Meier estimated overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model for overall mortality rate was generated to evaluate hazard ratios (HRs) of potential risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy patients with pT3a tumors composed each group. Preoperative variables were comparable between groups. The median follow-up time for the cohort was 20 (9-38) months and the renal function preservation was higher in the RPN group (86% vs 70%; p < 0.001). The estimated 3 years of OS (90% vs 84%; p = 0.42), CSS (94% vs 95%; p = 0.78), and RFS (95% vs. 100%; p = 0.06) were similar between RPN and RN groups, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression model, the presence of ≥2 aggressive tumor features was the only factor associated with increased risk of overall mortality rate (HR 4.01 95% confidence interval [1.13, 14.27)]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients with localized pT3a RCC treated with RPN had similar short-term oncological and better renal functional outcomes compared with similar cases treated by RN. In the minimally invasive robotic surgery era, renal masses suspicious for pathological T3a disease should not be a deterring factor for performing nephron-sparing surgery when technically feasible by skilled surgeons.

Multiple Tumor Excisions in Ipsilateral Kidney Increase Complications After Partial Nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical morbidity of ipsilateral synchronous multifocality (ISM) is poorly characterized. We assessed the impact of ISM on complications after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We abstracted data on RPN cases performed between 2006 and 2015 at our institution. Multifocal disease was characterized by >1 renal mass on preoperative imaging or >1 mass excision during RPN. The primary outcome was the rate of overall postoperative complications. The association between multifocality and complications was evaluated using univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 1121 cases, 59 (5.3%) had >1 ipsilateral renal mass and 50 (4.5%) required >1 excision. The overall complication rate was 20.3% (230/1121). The radiographic number of ipsilateral renal masses was not significantly associated with complications (20.2% for 1 mass vs. 25.4% for >1 mass, p = 0.338). However, the actual number of ipsilateral mass excisions performed during RPN was significantly associated with complications (20.2% for ≤2 excisions vs. 42.9% for >2 excisions, p = 0.037). Major complications were higher (14.3% vs. 5.3%) for >2 versus ≤2 excision(s), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.174). The most common complications associated with multiple excisions were transfusion, urine leak, arrhythmia, venous thromboembolism, and ileus. On multivariable analysis, number of excisions independently predicted complications (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.03-9.33, p = 0.041). Other independent predictors of complications included age, race, Charlson score, body mass index, RENAL score, and surgeon experience. CONCLUSIONS: ISM requiring ≥2 excisions is associated with increased morbidity after RPN. Pending external validation, this information may facilitate clinical decision-making and preoperative patient counseling.

Comparison of robot-assisted and open partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumours: a single centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open PN (OPN) for completely endophytic renal tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1 230 consecutive cases, consisting of 823 RAPNs and 407 OPNs, performed for renal mass at a single academic tertiary centre between 2011 and 2016. Of these, data on 87 RAPN and 56 OPN cases for completely endophytic renal tumours were analysed. Patient and tumour characteristics, operative, postoperative, functional, and oncological outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Apart from a higher prevalence of solitary kidney among OPN cases (RAPN, 5.7% vs OPN, 21.4%; P = 0.005), demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in tumour size (P = 0.07), tumour stage (P = 0.3), margin status (P = 0.48), malignant tumour subtypes (P = 0.51), and grades (P = 0.61) between the groups. Also, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups for warm ischaemia time (P = 0.15), cold ischaemia time (P = 0.28), and intraoperative (P = 0.75) or postoperative (Clavien-Dindo Grade I-V, P = 0.08; Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V, P = 0.85) complication rates. The patients in the RAPN group had a shorter length of stay (P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), and lower intraoperative transfusion rates (0% vs 7.1%, P = 0.02). No local recurrences occurred during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 15.2 (7-27.2) and 18.1 (8.2-30.9) months in the RAPN and OPN groups, respectively. There was no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation rates between groups for the early (P = 0.26) and latest (P = 0.22) functional follow-up. CONCLUSION: For completely endophytic renal tumours, both OPN and RAPN have excellent outcomes when performed by experienced surgeons at a high-volume centre. For skilled robotic surgeons, RAPN is a safe and effective alternative to OPN with the advantages of shorter length of stay and less blood loss.

Predicting complications in partial nephrectomy for T1a tumours: does approach matter?

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in complications after robot-assisted (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) among experienced surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients in our institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained database who underwent OPN or RAPN for management of unifocal, T1a renal tumours at our institution between January 2011 and August 2015. The primary outcome measure was the rate of 30-day overall postoperative complications. Baseline patient factors, tumour characteristics and peri-operative factors, including approach, were evaluated to assess the risk of complications. RESULTS: Patients who underwent OPN were found to have a higher rate of overall complications (30.3% vs 18.2%; P = 0.038), with wound complications accounting for the majority of these events (11.8% vs 1.8%; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed the open approach to be an independent predictor of overall complications (odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.03-2.43; P = 0.035). Major limitations of the study include its retrospective design and potential lack of generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: The open surgical approach predicts a higher rate of overall complications after partial nephrectomy for unifocal, T1a renal tumours. For experienced surgeons, the morbidity associated with nephron-sparing surgery may be incrementally improved using the robot-assisted approach.

Omission of Hemostatic Agents During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Does Not Increase Postoperative Bleeding Risk.

INTRODUCTION: The use of hemostatic agents (HA) during robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is largely empiric. We sought to assess the impact of HA on postoperative bleeding after RPN in a contemporary cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using our institutional RPN database, we identified consecutive patients treated between 2010 and 2015. HA were routinely placed in the nephrectomy bed at the time of renorrhaphy until 2014 when their use was phased out to reduce cost. We compared postoperative bleeding outcomes (blood transfusion and hemoglobin decline) between patients who did and did not receive HA, after excluding patients with preoperative anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dL) or high estimated blood loss (≥175 mL). The total inflation-adjusted costs (for 2015) of HA were calculated. RESULTS: Of 544 cases, HA were used in 240 (44.1%). The mean number of agents per case was 1.4 ± 0.73, including 77 (14.2%), 52 (9.6%), and 39 (7.2%) cases in which cellulose, fibrin, or gelatin-based agents were used alone, respectively, and 72 (13.2%) cases in which multiple agents were used. The mean cost of HA per case was $488 ± 421. Nearly 90% of cases were performed by surgeons who were beyond their learning curves. Overall, 13 (2.4%) patients were transfused, and the median hemoglobin decline was 2.2 g/dL (IQR, 1.4-3.0 g/dL). On univariate analysis, HA use and type of HA were not significantly associated with blood transfusion (p = 0.20 and p = 0.29, respectively), but were associated with hemoglobin decline (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). After adjusting for covariates, HA use was no longer significantly associated with postoperative hemoglobin decline. CONCLUSIONS: In nonanemic patients with minimal intraoperative bleeding, HA use does not alter postoperative bleeding outcomes after RPN, suggesting that their routine use in this setting merits reconsideration. Further research is needed to determine if HA may be useful in certain high-risk situations.

Predictors of Excisional Volume Loss in Partial Nephrectomy: Is There Still Room for Improvement?

UNLABELLED: Since volume loss is the most important modifiable determinant of long-term renal function after partial nephrectomy, there is great interest in ways to reduce the loss of healthy parenchyma. We retrospectively reviewed 880 partial nephrectomies to identify predictors of excisional volume loss (EVL), based on pathologic assessment. After stepwise variable selection, we assessed age, sex, solitary kidney status, tumor size, endophytic property, estimated blood loss, surgical approach, and surgeon volume for association with EVL using multiple regression. Male sex (p<0.01), larger tumors (p<0.01), endophytic tumors (p=0.01), open approach (p<0.01), increased bleeding (p<0.01), and higher surgeon volume (p<0.01) were independently associated with greater EVL. Approach strongly influenced EVL with open surgery having 7.8 cm(3) more EVL than robotic surgery. Negative surgical margins (95.7% vs 94.1%, p=0.32) did not differ between open and robotic approaches, respectively. EVL is associated with patient, tumor, and especially provider factors, suggesting that volume preservation may be improved with surgical optimization. Lack of percent volume loss data, which precluded assessment of EVL's impact on long-term renal function, is a limitation. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that surgical approach affects the quantity of healthy kidney removed during cancer surgery, suggesting that there is room for further surgical improvement.

Prognostic implications of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid differentiation in patients with grade 4 renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid differentiation are associated with poor outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined the impact of differentiation on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in surgically treated patients with grade 4 RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using our institutional database of 1176 nephrectomies from 2005 to 2013, we identified patients with grade 4 RCC or any grade and the presence of sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation. We divided the cohort based on differentiation: no differentiation, rhabdoid only, sarcomatoid only, and sarcomatoid and rhabdoid. CSS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Of 264 patients with grade 4 RCC, 159 (60.2 %) exhibited differentiation, including 45 (28.3 %) with rhabdoid only, 87 (54.7 %) with sarcomatoid only, and 27 (16.9 %) with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid. Sarcomatoid differentiation, either alone or with rhabdoid differentiation, was associated with worse median CSS than no differentiation (1.1 vs. 3.3 years, p < 0.01, and 0.9 vs. 3.3 years, p < 0.01, respectively). In patients with non-metastatic (HR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.19-3.19, p = 0.008) and metastatic (HR 2.22, 95 % CI 1.45-3.41, p < 0.001) RCC, sarcomatoid differentiation was associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific death. On multivariable analysis, sarcomatoid differentiation was an independent predictor of RCC death in patients with non-metastatic (HR 1.72, 95 % CI 1.04-2.84, p = 0.03) and metastatic (HR 1.74, 95 % CI 1.05-2.90, p = 0.03) disease. Rhabdoid differentiation alone was not associated with worse CSS (p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: In grade 4 RCC, sarcomatoid differentiation is associated with increased mortality risk across all stages of disease. Rhabdoid differentiation is not associated with additional mortality risk.

Management of complications arising from the treatment of small renal masses.

This article offers a review of the complications, and management of such complications, associated with different modalities used for the treatment of the small renal mass.

Race effects on pathological and functional outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy in a single academic tertiary care center.

To explore the potential effects of race on pathological outcomes of renal tumor and on kidney function preservation in the patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) at our center. Retrospective review of our institutional review board approved database for African-American (AA) patients undergoing RPN from 2006 to 2014 was performed. AA and non-AA groups were compared with regards to demographics, tumor characteristics, functional data and, oncological outcomes. For functional outcomes, groups were matched (1:1) in terms of age, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and R.E.N.A.L score. From the total of 1005 patients, 84 were AA. Age and the tumor size were comparable between the two groups (2.7 vs. 3 cm; p = 0.29). Proportion of patients with papillary RCC was higher among AAs compared to non-AAs (43.3 vs. 19.4 %; p < 0.001). After matching AA patients with non-AA counterparts (1:1 matching), eGFR preservation at latest follow up after surgery was comparable between groups (84.3 vs. 85 %; p = 0.25). AA race (OR 3.62, p < 0.001), male gender (OR 2.05, p < 0.001) and low preoperative eGFR (OR 0.97, p < 0.001) were predictors of papillary RCC on multivariate analyses. The incidence of papillary RCC is higher in AA patients undergoing RPN. There was no difference in kidney function recovery after robotic partial nephrectomy in both AA and non-AA groups. AA race itself is not a significant factor in determining renal malignancy. Further studies are needed to clarify the impact of higher prevalence of papillary tumors in AA group in terms of long-term oncological and functional outcomes.

Five-year Oncologic Outcomes After Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is established as a minimally invasive nephron-sparing technique with excellent perioperative and intermediate oncologic outcomes. However, long-term oncologic outcomes have not been reported to date. OBJECTIVE: To report long-term oncologic outcomes of RPN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients undergoing RPN from June 2006 to March 2010 were selected from our prospective RPN database. Patients with benign tumors, prior ipsilateral PN, or prior radical nephrectomy and those with follow-up of <1 mo were excluded. INTERVENTION: Transperitoneal RPN. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), cancer-free survival (CFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Univariate logistic regression analysis for overall mortality was performed to evaluate the odds ratio (OR) for variables of interest. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 115 RPNs for RCC were performed in 110 patients. The mean age was 59.8±11.0 yr and the median age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) was 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-5). The median tumor size was 2.6cm (IQR 2.0-3.7) and median RENAL score was 7 (IQR 6-9). Clear cell carcinoma was present in 67.8% of cases, and two cases (1.7%) had positive surgical margins. Glomerular filtration rate preservation was 87.8% (IQR 74.9-98.1), which translates to 19.1% chronic kidney disease upstaging. The median follow-up was 61.9 mo (IQR 50.9-71.4) and the 5-yr OS, CFS, and CSS were 91.1%, 97.8%, and 97.8%, respectively. On univariable logistic regression, ACCI was the only factor associated with a higher risk of overall mortality (OR 1.67, p=0.006). The retrospective design, the high surgical volume at our institution, and the potential selection bias with careful patient selection early in the RPN experience may limit the generalizability of our findings. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study confirming excellent long-term oncologic outcomes after RPN in a selected cohort of patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: Robotic partial nephrectomy is a relatively recently developed treatment for renal cell carcinoma. This study confirms its safety and reports excellent long-term cancer control.