ABSTRACT
RATIONALE: The hypothesis that lung collapse is detrimental during the acute respiratory distress syndrome is still debatable. One of the difficulties is the lack of an efficient maneuver to minimize it. OBJECTIVES: To test if a bedside recruitment strategy, capable of reversing hypoxemia and collapse in > 95% of lung units, is clinically applicable in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: Prospective assessment of a stepwise maximum-recruitment strategy using multislice computed tomography and continuous blood-gas hemodynamic monitoring. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received sequential increments in inspiratory airway pressures, in 5 cm H(2)O steps, until the detection of Pa(O(2)) + Pa(CO(2)) >or= 400 mm Hg. Whenever this primary target was not met, despite inspiratory pressures reaching 60 cm H(2)O, the maneuver was considered incomplete. If there was hemodynamic deterioration or barotrauma, the maneuver was to be interrupted. Late assessment of recruitment efficacy was performed by computed tomography (9 patients) or by online continuous monitoring in the intensive care unit (15 patients) up to 6 h. It was possible to open the lung and to keep the lung open in the majority (24/26) of patients, at the expense of transient hemodynamic effects and hypercapnia but without major clinical consequences. No barotrauma directly associated with the maneuver was detected. There was a strong and inverse relationship between arterial oxygenation and percentage of collapsed lung mass (R = - 0.91; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: It is often possible to reverse hypoxemia and fully recruit the lung in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Due to transient side effects, the required maneuver still awaits further evaluation before routine clinical application.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Hypoxia/therapy , Positive-Pressure Respiration/adverse effects , Pulmonary Atelectasis/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Barotrauma/etiology , Female , Humans , Hypoxia/etiology , Lung Injury , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen/blood , Pulmonary Atelectasis/etiology , Pulmonary Gas Exchange/physiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/complications , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/mortality , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Imbalances in regional lung ventilation, with gravity-dependent collapse and overdistention of nondependent zones, are likely associated to ventilator-induced lung injury. Electric impedance tomography is a new imaging technique that is potentially capable of monitoring those imbalances. The aim of this study was to validate electrical impedance tomography measurements of ventilation distribution, by comparison with dynamic computerized tomography in a heterogeneous population of critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation. Multiple scans with both devices were collected during slow-inflation breaths. Six repeated breaths were monitored by impedance tomography, showing acceptable reproducibility. We observed acceptable agreement between both technologies in detecting right-left ventilation imbalances (bias = 0% and limits of agreement = -10 to +10%). Relative distribution of ventilation into regions or layers representing one-fourth of the thoracic section could also be assessed with good precision. Depending on electrode positioning, impedance tomography slightly overestimated ventilation imbalances along gravitational axis. Ventilation was gravitationally dependent in all patients, with some transient blockages in dependent regions synchronously detected by both scanning techniques. Among variables derived from computerized tomography, changes in absolute air content best explained the integral of impedance changes inside regions of interest (r(2) > or = 0.92). Impedance tomography can reliably assess ventilation distribution during mechanical ventilation.