Higher levels of physical activity are associated with less evasive coping, better physical function and quality of life in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate daily physical activity (PA) in relation to psychosocial factors, such as anxiety, depression and different types of coping strategies, as well as patient- and disease-related factors in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Consecutive outpatients from the Groningen Leeuwarden AxSpA (GLAS) cohort completed the modified Short Questionnaire to assess health-enhancing PA (mSQUASH), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Coping with Rheumatic Stressors (CORS) questionnaires, as well as standardized patient- and disease-related assessments. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses and comparison of lowest and highest PA tertiles were performed to explore associations between the HADS, CORS, patient- and disease-related factors and PA. RESULTS: In total, 84 axSpA patients were included; 60% male, mean age 49 (SD ±14) years, median symptom duration 20 (25th-75th percentiles: 12-31) years, mean ASDAS 2.1 (±1.0). Higher PA levels were significantly associated with better scores on patient-reported disease activity (BASDAI), physical function (BASFI) and quality of life (ASQoL). Furthermore, higher levels of PA were associated with less impact of axSpA on wellbeing and lower HADS depression scores. In the multivariable linear regression model, less use of the coping strategy 'decreasing activities' (ß: -376.4; p 0.003) and lower BMI (ß:-235.5; p: 0.030) were independently associated with higher level of PA. Comparison of patients from the lowest and highest PA tertiles showed results similar to those found in the regression analyses. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of axSpA patients, higher levels of daily PA were associated with better patient-reported outcomes and lower depression scores. Additionally, the passive coping strategy "decreasing activities" and lifestyle factor BMI were independently associated with PA. Besides anti-inflammatory treatment, coping strategies and lifestyle should be taken into account in the management of individual axSpA patients. Incorporating these aspects into patient education could increase patient awareness and self-efficacy. In the future, longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the complex relationship between patient-, disease- and psychosocial factors associated with daily PA.

Patients' Perspectives on Axial Pain in Relation to Inflammation and Structural Damage in a Large Cohort of Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore to what extent patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) link experienced pain in the neck, back, and hips to inflammation and/or structural damage. METHODS: Patients from the Groningen Leeuwarden Axial Spondyloarthritis (GLAS) cohort visiting the outpatient clinic between 2016 and 2019 filled out two additional questions in relation to the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) question 2: (1) "To what extent do you think the pain you experience in your neck, back, and hips is related to inflammation caused by axSpA?" and (2) "To what extent do you think the pain you experience in your neck, back, and hips is related to damage of the spine and joints caused by axSpA?" Answers had to be depicted on a numeric rating scale from 0 (none) to 10 (very much); a difference of ≥2 points between the scores of these questions was considered clinically relevant in favor of the highest scoring question. RESULTS: A total of 688 patients with axSpA (24% with nonradiographic axSpA [nr-axSpA]) were included (62% male, mean ± SD age 48 ± 14 years, and mean ± SD Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] 2.3 ± 1.0). Seventy-five percent of patients could not link the origin of their pain, 15% linked axial pain predominantly to inflammation, and 10% linked axial pain predominantly to damage. Patients in the inflammation group were younger, had shorter symptom duration, were more frequently diagnosed with nr-axSpA, had higher ASDASCRP , had more often elevated CRP levels, had fewer comorbidities, had better spinal mobility, and had less spinal radiographic damage. CONCLUSION: In our large observational cohort, the majority of patients with axSpA could not differentiate the origin of experienced axial pain. If patients were able to link axial pain to clinical inflammation or damage, it was in concordance with clinical assessments and radiographic outcome, which may be helpful in establishing the origin of pain and supporting better patient-centered treatment decisions.

Differences in characteristics, health status and fulfillment of exercise recommendations between axial spondyloarthritis patients with and without supervised group exercise.

OBJECTIVE: Since decades, supervised group exercise (SGE) is recommended for people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). This study examines if weekly SGE contributes to fulfillment of exercise recommendations in axSpA patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from three studies with axSpA patients in The Netherlands, including two with outpatient populations (n = 196 and n = 153) and one with SGE participants (n = 128), were analysed. Sociodemographic and disease characteristics, SGE participation, health status (ASAS Health Index), spinal mobility and fulfillment of the recommendations for leisure-time aerobic (≥150 min/week moderate-intensity or ≥75 min/week vigorous-intensity) and strength and mobility (≥2 sessions/week) exercise (measured with SQUASH-questionnaire) were assessed. Differences between patients with and without SGE were analysed. RESULTS: In the two outpatient populations (n = 349), 17 patients (5%) used SGE. The SGE participants (n = 145) were significantly older, had longer disease duration, were less frequently employed, used less medication and had worse spinal mobility than patients without SGE (n = 332). There were no significant differences in health status. Patients with SGE fulfilled the moderate-intensity aerobic (89 % vs. 69%) and strength and mobility (44 % vs. 29%) exercise recommendations more often than patients without SGE, but the aerobic exercise recommendation was less often fulfilled with vigorous-intensity exercise (5 % vs. 12%). CONCLUSION: SGE is used by just few, especially older, axSpA patients and contributes to fulfilling recommendations for moderate-intensity, mobility and strength exercise. Both in patients with and without SGE, only a minority fulfilled the recommendations for vigorous-intensity, strength and mobility exercises. Therefore, future promotion of exercise should focus on implementing these types of exercise.

Central sensitization has major impact on quality of life in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent pain has large potential impact on quality of life (QoL). During the course of the disease, many patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) report persistent pain. Central sensitization (CS) may explain part of this chronic pain. However, the role of CS in relation to QoL has been sparsely studied in axSpA. Therefore, our aim was to explore the relationship between CS and QoL in patients with axSpA. METHODS: Consecutive outpatients from the Groningen Leeuwarden axSpA (GLAS) cohort completed the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI; range 0-100) and the AS Quality of Life (ASQoL; range 0-18). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between CSI and ASQoL scores correcting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 178 included axSpA patients, mean CSI score was 38.0 ± 14.1 and 45% scored ≥40, which indicates a high probability of CS. Mean ASQoL score was 6.0 ± 5.3 and mean ASDASCRP 2.1 ± 1.0. A CSI score ≥40 was significantly associated with higher ASQoL score (mean 9.7 vs. 3.3), higher ASDASCRP (mean 2.6 vs. 1.7), female gender (60% vs. 29%) and more often entheseal involvement (61% vs. 26%). In univariable analysis, CSI score explained a large proportion of the variation in ASQoL (B = 0.06, 95%CI: 0.05-0.07; R2=0.46). This association remained significant after correction for ASDASCRP, gender, entheseal involvement, comorbidities, symptom duration, smoking status, BMI class and educational level (B = 0.04, 95%CI: 0.03-0.05). CONCLUSION: CS is strongly related to patient-reported QoL in patients with axSpA independently from other patient- and disease-related aspects.

The mSQUASH; a valid, reliable and responsive questionnaire for daily physical activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

AIM: Adaptation of the Short QUestionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) in order to improve measurement properties in axSpA patients. METHODS: The original SQUASH was adapted using a qualitative stepwise approach with in-depth interviews including healthcare professionals and patients. Content validity was explored by comparing modified-SQUASH (mSQUASH) and original SQUASH. Next, mSQUASH was validated according to the OMERACT filter. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used as comparator and tri-axial accelerometer as gold standard for criterion validity and classification accuracy of intensity. Construct validity was assessed using Spearman correlations with clinical outcome assessments. For test-retest reliability, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. Responsiveness was assessed using standardized response mean (SRM), stratified by Anchor method. RESULTS: The mSQUASH measured a systematically higher activity count and had less missing values (8% vs. 16%) then SQUASH. mSQUASH correlated better with accelerometer compared to IPAQ (ρ = 0.60 vs. ρ = 0.34). Accelerometer measured most activity in light intensity, whereas mSQUASH and IPAQ predominately measured moderate intensity. Correlations with ASDAS, BASDAI, BASFI and ASQoL were better for mSQUASH then IPAQ. Test-retest reliability was good in both questionnaires. In contrast to IPAQ, responsiveness was in correspondence with self-reported changes in physical activity for mSQUASH (SRM -0.84 for improvement and 0.88 for decrease). The average completion time of the mSQUASH was 7 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The development of the mSQUASH resulted in an easy applicable, valid, reliable and responsive questionnaire for the assessment of daily physical activity in axSpA patients, which can be used in research and daily clinical practice.

Central sensitization, illness perception and obesity should be considered when interpreting disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Many patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) report persistent pain even when treated with anti-inflammatory agents. Our aim was to explore the presence of central sensitization (CS) and different types of illness perceptions in patients with axSpA, and to assess their associations with disease activity assessments. METHODS: Consecutive outpatients from the Groningen Leeuwarden Axial Spondyloarthritis (GLAS) cohort were included. Besides standardized assessments, patients filled out the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to investigate the association between questionnaire scores, patient characteristics and disease activity assessments ASDASCRP, BASDAI and CRP. RESULTS: We included 182 patients with a mean symptom duration of 21.6 years. Mean ASDASCRP was 2.1, mean BASDAI 3.9, and median CRP 2.9. Mean CSI score was 37.8 (scale 0-100) and 45% of patients scored ≥40, indicating a high probability of CS. CSI score, IPQ-R domain identity (number of symptoms the patient attributes to their illness), and IPQ-R domain treatment control (perceived treatment efficacy), and obesity were significantly and independently associated with both ASDASCRP and BASDAI, explaining a substantial proportion of variation in these disease activity scores (R2=0.35 and R2=0.47, respectively). Only obesity was also independently associated with CRP. CONCLUSION: CS may be common in patients with long-term axSpA. CS, as well as specific illness perceptions and obesity were all independently associated with the widely used (partially) patient-reported disease activity assessments ASDASCRP and BASDAI. Treating physicians should take this into account in the follow-up and treatment of their patients.

Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score is related to NSAID use, especially in patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are regarded as the cornerstone of conventional treatment for AS. However little is known about concomitant NSAID use during treatment (with TNF-α inhibitors) in daily clinical practice. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Consecutive patients from the GLAS cohort were included. NSAID use and ASAS-NSAID index were evaluated at group level and at individual patient level during 52 weeks of follow-up. Analyses were stratified for treatment regimen. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to evaluate NSAID use in relation to assessments of disease activity over time. In patients starting TNF-α inhibitors (n = 254), 79% used NSAIDs at baseline and this proportion decreased significantly to 38% at 52 weeks. ASAS-NSAID index also decreased significantly from median 65 to 0. In patients on conventional treatment (n = 139), 74% used NSAIDs at baseline with median ASAS-NSAID index of 50 and this remained stable during follow-up. At each follow-up visit, approximately half of the patients changed their type or dose of NSAIDs. GEE analysis over time showed that NSAID use was associated with AS disease activity score (p<0.05). This relation was more pronounced in patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors compared to conventional treatment (B = 0.825 vs. B = 0.250). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational cohort of established AS patients, there was no difference in baseline NSAID use between patients with and without indication for TNF-α inhibitors. NSAID use decreased significantly after starting TNF-α inhibitors. During conventional treatment, NSAID use remained stable at group level. However, NSAID use changed frequently at individual patient level and was significantly associated with disease activity.