Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 37
Filter
1.
Autoimmun Rev ; 16(11): 1155-1159, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28899800

ABSTRACT

Despite the improvement in the quality of life of patients with SLE due to scientific and technological advances, SLE remains a disease that over the years may produce irreversible damage to patients. Osteoporosis and secondary bone fractures are two of the major causes of irreparable injury in patients with SLE. Vitamin D insufficiency may play a vital role both in reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and in the appearance of fractures, although its mechanisms of action are still unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature in order to determine the prevalence and predictors of reduced vitamin D plasma levels, bone loss and the presence of fractures in SLE patients. Our review encompassed all English-language publications using Medline and EMBase electronic databases from their inception (1966 and 1980, respectively) to December 2016. We included all intervention studies and observational studies in which vitamin D plasma levels, BMD and bone loss were measured and applied to patients with SLE. Previous studies suggested an increase in bone loss and fracture in patients with SLE compared with general population and although there is a high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in the general population, previous studies had demonstrated lower vitamin D levels in patients with SLE compared to age-matched controls. The etiology of reduced bone mass and reduced vitamin D plasma levels in SLE is multifactorial and includes a variety of intrinsic factors related to the disease itself and treatment side effects. SLE patients are at risk for developing these two comorbidities (reduced vitamin D plasma levels and low BMD) and it is therefore essential to study, monitor, prevent and treat bone metabolism disorders in SLE patients.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Vitamin D Deficiency/prevention & control , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Humans , Osteoporosis/etiology , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Vitamin D Deficiency/etiology
4.
Rheumatol Int ; 36(7): 975-85, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27233506

ABSTRACT

It has been previously reported that vitamin D deficiency is more prevalent among SLE patients than in the general population. We sought to determine the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency and their related factors, its relationship to SLE symptoms and disease activity on a group of supplemented and non-supplemented female SLE patients from the Mediterranean region. We performed a cross-sectional study including female SLE patients who regularly attended the outpatient Lupus Unit at Parc de Salut Mar-IMAS in Barcelona, from January 2012 to May 2014. Collected data were sociodemographics, vitamin D supplementation, fatigue degree visual analog scale, pharmacological treatment, main SLE serological markers, indexes, scales and plasma levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. One hundred and two consecutive female SLE patients were included. Vitamin D overall insufficiency and deficiency were exhibited by 46 and 22.5 % of patients, respectively. Vitamin D insufficiency was found in 50 % of supplemented and 60 % of non-supplemented patients. Among non-supplemented female SLE patients, it was found that patients with vitamin D insufficiency showed more fatigue (p = 0.009) and received more oral corticosteroids (p = 0.02) than those with normal levels. Patients with vitamin D insufficiency (supplemented and non-supplemented) received more oral corticosteroids than those without insufficiency (p = 0.008). Vitamin D insufficiency is highly prevalent among female SLE patients, even in southern regions. Non-supplemented female SLE patients showed more fatigue and received more oral corticosteroids than those with normal levels of vitamin D. These data were not found in supplemented patients although having a high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (up to 50 %). Further studies with longer follow-up and larger population are needed to confirm our observations.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Vitamin D Deficiency/epidemiology , Vitamin D Deficiency/prevention & control , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin D/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/diagnosis
5.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 11(1): 3-8, ene.-feb. 2015. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-132355

ABSTRACT

Objetivos. Describir la estrategia terapéutica óptima de uso de metotrexato en AR sobre dosis inicial, vía de administración, incremento y disminución de dosis, seguimiento del paciente y uso de ácido fólico/folínico. Material y método. Once expertos plantearon los interrogantes clínicos a resolver. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica sistemática. Los contenidos fueron seleccionados en una sesión de trabajo y el nivel de acuerdo se estableció posteriormente en una ronda de consenso vía correo. Resultados. La dosis de inicio de metotrexato no debe ser < 10 mg/semana, preferentemente por vía oral, considerando la vía parenteral como alternativa según el cumplimento, ineficacia o efectos secundarios gastrointestinales, polimedicación, obesidad (si requiere dosis > 20 mg/semana), preferencias del paciente, enfermedad muy activa o para evitar errores de medicación. Se cambiará a la vía parenteral cuando haya ineficacia, toxicidad gastrointestinal, incumplimiento o por coste-efectividad antes de pasar a fármacos más caros; y a la inversa, según preferencias del paciente, intolerancia a inyectables, reducción de dosis < 7,5 mg/semana, ineficacia, bajo cumplimiento o efectos adversos gastrointestinales. Se realizará escalada rápida de dosis si la respuesta es inadecuada hasta los 15-20 o, incluso, 25 mg/semana en unas 8 semanas, con incrementos de 2,5-5 mg. La reducción se realizará según la dosis a la que estuviera el paciente, con disminuciones de 2,5-5 mg cada 3-6 meses. El seguimiento del paciente deberá realizarse cada 1-1,5 meses hasta la estabilidad y luego cada 1-3 meses. Conclusiones. Este documento pretende resolver algunos interrogantes clínicos habituales y facilitar la toma de decisiones en la AR tratada con metotrexato (AU)


Objectives, To describe the optimal therapeutic strategy for use of methotrexate in RA patients over the initial dose, route of administration, dose increase and decrease, patient monitoring, and use of folic/folinic acid. Materials and methods. Eleven clinical experts proposed some questions to be solved. A systematic literature search was conducted. The contents were selected in a work session and subsequently validated via email to establish the level of agreement. Results. The initial dose of methotrexate should not be <10 mg/week, preferably orally, but the parenteral route is considered as an alternative due to compliance, non-effectiveness of treatment or gastrointestinal side effects, polypharmacy, obesity (if required doses are >20 mg/week), patient preference, very active disease or to avoid administration errors. Changing to a parenteral administration is proposed when the oral route is not effective enough, gastrointestinal toxicity appears, there is non-compliance or due to cost-effectiveness reasons before using more expensive drugs. On the contrary, due to patient preferences, intolerance to injections, dose reduction <7.5 mg/week, non-effectiveness of the route, poor compliance or gastrointestinal side effects. There should be a rapid dose escalation if inadequate responses occur up to 15–20 or even 25 mg/week in about 8 weeks, with increments of 2.5–5 mg. The reduction will be carried out according to the dose the patient had, with decreases of 2.5–5 mg every 3–6 months. Patient monitoring should be performed every 1–1.5 months until stability is reached and then for every 1–3 months. Conclusions. This document pretends to solve some common clinical questions and facilitate decision-making in RA patients treated with methotrexate (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Routes , Dosage/methods , Dosage/prevention & control , Cost Allocation , Costs and Cost Analysis/methods , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/economics , Dosage Forms/standards
7.
Reumatol Clin ; 11(1): 3-8, 2015.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24746914

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the optimal therapeutic strategy for use of methotrexate in RA patients over the initial dose, route of administration, dose increase and decrease, patient monitoring, and use of folic/folinic acid. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eleven clinical experts proposed some questions to be solved. A systematic literature search was conducted. The contents were selected in a work session and subsequently validated via email to establish the level of agreement. RESULTS: The initial dose of methotrexate should not be <10mg/week, preferably orally, but considering the parenteral route as an alternative due to compliance, non effectiveness of treatment or gastrointestinal side effects, polypharmacy, obesity (if required doses are >20mg/week), patient preference, very active disease or to avoid administration errors. Changing to a parenteral administration is proposed when the oral route is not effective enough, gastrointestinal toxicity appears, there is non-compliance or due to cost-effectiveness reasons before using more expensive drugs. On the contrary, due to patient preferences, intolerance to injections, dose reduction <7.5mg/week, non effectiveness of the route, poor compliance or gastrointestinal side effects. There should be a rapid dose escalation if inadequate responses occurr up to 15-20 or even 25mg/week in about 8 weeks, with increments of 2.5-5mg. The reduction will be carried out according to the dose the patient had, with decreases of 2.5-5mg every 3-6 months. Patient monitoring should be performed every 1-1.5 months until stability and then every 1-3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This document pretends to solve some common clinical questions and facilitate decision-making in RA patients treated with methotrexate.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Monitoring , Humans , Injections , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
8.
Rheumatol Int ; 35(3): 509-15, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25030324

ABSTRACT

Studies have found an increase in bone loss and fracture in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with general population. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fragility fractures and to find potential predictors of bone loss in our cohort of SLE patients. We performed a cross-sectional study and collected 67 bone density measurements (BMD) of our SLE patients. We also collected sociodemographic data, 25-OH-vitamin D levels, serological markers, activity index, SLE cumulative damage index, and pharmacologic treatment. Sixty-seven consecutive BMD from SLE patients were assessed. Osteopenia was found in 28-46% of SLE patients. Osteoporosis ranged from 3 to 6%[corrected]. The only statistically significant correlation we found was between weight and height with total hip and femoral neck BMD (p < 0.05). The most frequent BMD-affected site was at the femoral neck, showing osteopenia in 40.3% [corrected] of SLE patients. Osteoporosis was found in up to 6% [corrected] of SLE patients. We found no predictors of bone loss in relation to the disease activity or its treatment. Fragility fractures were seen in 4.4% of SLE patients. All patients with fragility fractures showed osteopenia at BMD. There is a high prevalence of bone loss in SLE patients, since up to 40% [corrected] of SLE patients showed low BMD. Total hip and femoral neck osteopenia were the most frequent findings correlated with low BMI. We found a lower prevalence of fragility fractures compared with other series.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adult , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/blood , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/diagnostic imaging , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Femur Neck/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/blood , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Spain/epidemiology , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin D/blood
9.
Joint Bone Spine ; 80(4): 402-6, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23146313

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease which may has joint impairment. Often, SLE patients complain of hand and wrist arthralgia (HA). Usually, these patients do not show any swelling in the physical exam. Our aim was to demonstrate Power Doppler Ultrasound (PDUS) abnormalities in SLE patients with HA. METHODS: We recruited 58 consecutive SLE patients and divided them into two groups: case group (n = 28) were patients with HA, and control group (n = 30) were patients without HA. We also collected socio-demographic and disease activity data, biological markers and SLEDAI index. We evaluated disability and quality of life by mHAQ and SF-12, respectively. We performed a bilateral hand and wrist PDUS on all patients. PDUS findings were based in OMERACT-7 group criteria. RESULTS: We found PDUS abnormalities in most of SLE patients who suffered HA, when compared to SLE controls (P < 0.001). The main findings in Case Group were: tenosynovitis (39.2%), synovial effusion or hypertrophy (25%) and active synovitis (14.2%). SLEDAI score and dsDNA antibodies were related to the presence of PDUS abnormalities (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). We also found worse physical SF-12 (P < 0.05) and mHAQ (NS) scores in case group. CONCLUSIONS: SLE patients who present HA have more PDUS abnormalities. These findings are associated with a higher SLEDAI score and dsDNA antibodies. This articular affection may contribute to a worsened functional ability and a lower quality of life. PDUS seems to be a reliable tool in the assessment of SLE patients with HA.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/diagnostic imaging , Arthralgia/epidemiology , Hand Joints/diagnostic imaging , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnostic imaging , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Arthralgia/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Hand Joints/pathology , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/pathology , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Wrist Joint/pathology
10.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 7(6): 357-379, nov.-dic. 2011. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-91554

ABSTRACT

Objetivo. Dado el creciente avance en el diagnóstico como evaluación y tratamiento de la osteoporosis, y la incorporación de nuevas herramientas y medicamentos, desde la Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER) se ha impulsado el desarrollo de recomendaciones basadas en la mejor evidencia posible. Estas deben de servir de referencia para reumatólogos y otros profesionales de la salud implicados en el tratamiento de pacientes con osteoporosis. Métodos. Las recomendaciones se emitieron siguiendo la metodología de grupos nominales. El nivel de evidencia y el grado de recomendación se clasificaron según el modelo del Center for Evidence Based Medicine de Oxford y el grado de acuerdo se extrajo por técnica Delphi. Se utilizó toda la información de consensos previos y guías de práctica clínica disponibles. Resultados. Se realizan recomendaciones sobre el diagnóstico, la evaluación y el tratamiento en pacientes con osteoporosis. Estas recomendaciones incluyen la osteoporosis secundaria a glucocorticoides, la osteoporosis premenopáusica y la del varón. Conclusiones. Se presentan las recomendaciones SER sobre el diagnóstico, la evaluación y el manejo de pacientes con osteoporosis (AU)


Objective. Due to increasing improvement in the diagnosis, evaluation and management of osteoporosis and the development of new tools and drugs, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) has promoted the development of recommendations based on the best evidence available. These recommendations should be a reference to rheumatologists and other health professionals involved in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis. Methods. Recommendations were developed following a nominal group methodology and based on a systematic review. The level of evidence and degree of recommendation were classified according to the model proposed by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford. The level of agreement was established through Delphi technique. Evidence from previous consensus and available clinical guidelines was used. Results. We have produced recommendations on diagnosis, evaluation and management of osteoporosis. These recommendations include the glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, premenopausal and male osteoporosis. Conclusions. We present the SER recommendations related to the biologic therapy risk management (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Societies, Medical/trends , Societies, Medical , Rheumatology/methods , Rheumatology/trends , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/trends , Rheumatology/education , Rheumatology/ethics , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology
11.
Clin Drug Investig ; 31(12): 817-24, 2011 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22035462

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Calcium and vitamin D supplementation is recommended in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis. One group that could benefit from this treatment is women with senile osteoporosis. Two sources of supplementary calcium are ossein-hydroxyapatite complex (OHC) and calcium carbonate, but, to date, their comparative effects on bone metabolism have not been studied in women with senile osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of OHC and calcium carbonate on bone metabolism in women with senile osteoporosis. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled, prospective study to compare the effects of OHC (treatment group) and calcium carbonate (control group) on bone metabolism. Patients were included between 2000 and 2004 and followed up for a maximum of 3 years. The study was carried out at the bone metabolism unit of two university hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. Subjects were women aged >65 years with densitometric osteoporosis of the lumbar spine or femoral neck. The treatment group received open-label OHC (Osteopor®) at a dose of two 830 mg tablets every 12 hours (712 mg elemental calcium per day). The control group received open-label calcium carbonate at a dose of 500 mg of elemental calcium every 12 hours (1000 mg elemental calcium per day). Both groups also received a vitamin D supplement (calcifediol 266 µg) at a dose of one vial orally every 15 days. Biochemical markers of bone remodelling (osteocalcin by electrochemiluminescence, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase using colorimetry) were measured at baseline and annually for 3 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck was also measured. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty women were included (55 in the OHC group and 65 in the calcium carbonate group), of whom 54 completed 3 years of follow-up. Levels of serum osteocalcin increased to a greater extent in the OHC group compared with the calcium carbonate group (by a mean ± SD of 0.84 ± 3.13 ng/mL at year 2 and 1.86 ± 2.22 ng/mL at year 3 in the OHC group compared with a mean ± SD decrease of 0.39 ± 1.39 ng/mL at year 2 and an increase of 0.31 ± 2.51 ng/mL at year 3 in the calcium carbonate group); the differences between treatment groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05) at both years. Changes over time in serum osteocalcin level were also statistically significant (p < 0.05) in the OHC group, but not in the calcium carbonate group. Changes in mean BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck between baseline and year 3 were -1.1% and 2.5% for OHC and -2.3% and 1.2% for calcium carbonate, respectively. CONCLUSION: OHC had a greater anabolic effect on bone than calcium carbonate.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Calcifediol/therapeutic use , Calcium Carbonate/pharmacology , Dietary Supplements , Durapatite/pharmacology , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Vitamins/pharmacology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biocompatible Materials/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Calcium Carbonate/therapeutic use , Durapatite/therapeutic use , Female , Femur Neck/drug effects , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/drug effects , Prospective Studies , Vitamins/therapeutic use
12.
Reumatol Clin ; 7(6): 357-79, 2011.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22078694

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Due to increasing improvement in the diagnosis, evaluation and management of osteoporosis and the development of new tools and drugs, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) has promoted the development of recommendations based on the best evidence available. These recommendations should be a reference to rheumatologists and other health professionals involved in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: Recommendations were developed following a nominal group methodology and based on a systematic review. The level of evidence and degree of recommendation were classified according to the model proposed by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford. The level of agreement was established through Delphi technique. Evidence from previous consensus and available clinical guidelines was used. RESULTS: We have produced recommendations on diagnosis, evaluation and management of osteoporosis. These recommendations include the glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, premenopausal and male osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: We present the SER recommendations related to the biologic therapy risk management.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis , Absorptiometry, Photon , Bone Density , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Risk Factors , Spain
15.
Joint Bone Spine ; 78(4): 405-8, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21459648

ABSTRACT

Thromboembolic events tend to arise during the natural lifetime of tumors. However, multiple thromboemboli mimicking catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome is quite rare as a first manifestation of a tumor. Herein we describe the case of a 51-year old woman that presented with multiple thromboemboli affecting her brain, lung and kidneys. Despite bolus administration of corticosteroids, anticoagulant therapy and immunoglobulin infusion treatment, the patient died. She had suffered from two occult tumors, which could not be identified premortem: a lung adenocarcinoma and an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. This case underscores the importance of determining the underlying etiology behind multiple thromboemboli. The most important prognostic factor is rapid initiation of treatment of the multiple thromboemboli, emphasizing treatment of their etiology.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/diagnosis , Cholangiocarcinoma/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/diagnosis , Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/pathology , Catastrophic Illness , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fatal Outcome , Female , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Middle Aged
17.
Calcif Tissue Int ; 86(3): 220-6, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20101397

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD), resulting in increasing susceptibility to bone fractures. In men, it has been related to some diseases and toxic habits, but in some instances the cause of the primary--or idiopathic--osteoporosis is not apparent. In a previous study, our group compared histomorphometric measurements in cortical and cancellous bones from male idiopathic osteoporosis (MIO) patients to those of control subjects and found reduced bone formation without major differences in bone resorption. To confirm these results, this study analyzed the etiology of this pathology, examining the osteoblast behavior in vitro. We compared two parameters of osteoblast activity in MIO patients and controls: osteoblastic proliferation and gene expression of COL1A1 and osteocalcin, in basal conditions and with vitamin D(3) added. All these experiments were performed from a first-passage osteoblastic culture, obtained from osteoblasts that had migrated from the transiliac explants to the plate. The results suggested that the MIO osteoblast has a slower proliferation rate and decreased expression of genes related to matrix formation, probably due to a lesser or slower response to some stimulus. We concluded that, contrary to female osteoporosis, in which loss of BMD is predominantly due to increased resorption, low BMD in MIO seems to be due to an osteoblastic defect.


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones/metabolism , Bone and Bones/physiopathology , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Osteocalcin/genetics , Osteoporosis/metabolism , Osteoporosis/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Bone and Bones/pathology , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Cholecalciferol/metabolism , Cholecalciferol/pharmacology , Collagen Type I/genetics , Collagen Type I, alpha 1 Chain , Down-Regulation/genetics , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation/physiology , Genetic Markers/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoblasts/drug effects , Osteogenesis/genetics , Osteoporosis/pathology , RNA, Messenger/analysis , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Sex Characteristics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...