Inguinal hernia mesh is safe in 1720 patients.

BACKGROUND: There is substantial media and patient interest in the safety of mesh for hernia repair. However, there is a lack of data regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients who undergo inguinal hernia repair (IHR) with mesh. The purpose of this study is report short and long-term postoperative quality of life outcomes in patients following IHR with mesh. METHODS: We analyzed outcomes of 1720 patients who underwent IHR with mesh between 2008 and 2019 at a single institution from a prospectively maintained quality database. All surgeries were performed by four board-certified surgeons. HRQOL outcomes were measured using the Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) and Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) surveys that were administered preoperatively, 3 weeks, 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Survey responses were summarized as mean with standard deviation or frequency with percentage. Postoperative SOMS scores were compared to preoperative scores using the two-tailed paired t test with a significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: One (0.1%) patient experienced a mesh infection postoperatively. In terms of complications, 159 (9.2%) developed a seroma, 31 (1.8%) a hematoma, and 36 (2.1%) patients experienced a recurrence. SOMS Pain Impact, SOMS Pain Quality, and SOMS Pain visual analog scale at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years were all improved from preoperative (all p < 0.05). At 5 years postoperatively, only 3.9%, 3.2%, and 3.1% of patients reported severe or disabling sensation of mesh, pain, and movement limitations, respectively. CONCLUSION: Inguinal hernia repair with mesh results in a low rate of complications. A minority of patients had severe or disabling symptoms at 5-year follow-up and generally reported improvements in pain impact and quality in long-term follow-up.

Short-term quality of life comparison of laparoscopic, open, and robotic incisional hernia repairs.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of incisional hernia repair (IHR) include recurrence and quality of life (QOL). Operative approaches include laparoscopic, open, and robotic approaches. Data regarding comparative QOL outcomes among these repair types are unknown. Our study evaluates quality of life after three approaches to IHR. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing open (OHR), laparoscopic (LIHR), and robotic extra-peritoneal (RIHR) at a single institution from 2009 to 2019 were reviewed from a prospectively managed quality database. Short-term QOL was compared among the three procedures using the Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) and Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), objective pain scores and postoperative narcotic use. Data regarding length of stay (LOS), emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, reoperations and surgical site infection (SSI) were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 795 patients undergoing IHR were analyzed (418 open, 300 laparoscopic and 77 robotic). Patient were similar in age, gender and co-morbidities. LIHR patients had higher BMI and RIHR patients had larger hernia and mesh size. LOS was longer and rate of SSI was higher for OIHR compared to laparoscopic and RIHR. Patients undergoing LIHR reported increased narcotic use, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and CCS pain scores compared to open and robotic repair. Return to daily activity was 4 days shorter for robotic than open and laparoscopic repair; ED visits, readmissions, reoperations, and other QOL domains were similar. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that short-term quality of life after robotic extra-peritoneal IHR is improved compared to open and laparoscopic repair. Additional follow up is required to determine differences in long-term QOL after IHR.

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal approaches are equally effective for spigelian hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: Spigelian hernias (SH) are rare intraparietal abdominal wall hernias occurring just medial to the semilunar line. Several small series have reported on laparoscopic SH repair and both totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches have been described. However, there are limited outcome data including both of these techniques. We present the largest series to date of laparoscopic SH repair comparing both popular approaches. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 77) undergoing laparoscopic SH repair from 2009 to 2019 were identified from a prospectively managed quality database. All procedures were performed at a single institution. Patients were divided based on laparoscopic approach used, TEP group (n = 37) and TAPP group (n = 40). Comparison of patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and post-operative complications between TAPP and TEP groups was made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Individuals undergoing TAPP had higher mean BMI (29.3 ± 5.4 vs. 26.3 ± 5.6 kg/m2; p = 0.019) and were more likely to have had prior abdominal surgery (65% vs 24.3%, (p < 0.001). Mean procedure length was 77 ± 45 min for TAPP repairs and 48 ± 21 for TEP repairs (p = 0.001). TAPP repairs had a significantly longer median LOS than TEP (25 vs. 7 h; p < 0.001). Days of narcotic use were significantly shorter after TEP repair than for TAPP (0 vs. 3; p = 0.007) and return to ADL was significantly shorter after TEP repair than for TAPP (5 vs. 7 days; p = 0.016. There were no significant differences in readmission, reoperations, SSI, or recurrence between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our large series revealed that both preperitoneal laparoscopic approaches, TEP, and TAPP, for SH repair are equally safe, effective, and can be performed on an outpatient basis. Therefore, we suggest that the approach used for repair should be based on surgeon experience, preference, and individual patient factors.

Somatic DNA copy number alterations in non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE) biopsy tissue and compare the rate of somatic DNA copy number alterations (CNAs) in patients who subsequently progressed to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) to those patients who did not. METHODS: A retrospectively collected database of Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients spanning a 16-year period was queried. Patients who progressed from NDBE to HGD or EAC were identified and compared to patients who did not. Initial biopsy specimens were microdissected and extracted DNA underwent Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) for CNAs. Comparisons between progressors and non-progressors were made with Fisher's exact and two-sample t tests. Logistic regression assessed factors associated with progression. RESULTS: Of the 2459 patients in the BE database, 36 patients progressed from NDBE to either HGD or EAC. There were eight progressors who had biopsy specimens with adequate DNA for analysis. The progressor and non-progressor cohort had similar demographic information and medical history. The progressor group trended towards being older at diagnosis (72 ± 10 vs. 64 ± 13 years, p = 0.097) and fewer progressors reported reflux symptoms (50 vs. 94.7%, p < 0.001). Progressor specimens had more overall CNAs (75% vs. 33.6%, p = 0.026). On univariable analysis, there was an association between progression and absence of GERD symptoms (OR 16.54 [3.42-80.03], p = 0.001), any CNA (OR 5.10 [1.18-23.30], p = 0.035), and CNA in GATA6 or ERBB2 (OR 6.72 [1.18-38.22], p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who progressed from NDBE to HGD or EAC were older at first diagnosis of BE and fewer of the progressors reported symptoms of reflux when compared to non-progressors. Progression was associated with the presence of any CNA and specific CNAs in GATA6 or ERBB2.

Five-year results of endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision (transoral outlet reduction) for weight gain after gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: The study aim is to determine if patients who have undergone endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision (EGJR) maintain weight loss up to 5 years postoperatively. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent EGJR with a full-thickness endoscopic suturing device between April 2009 and June 2018. Percent of excess body weight loss (%EBWL) was calculated using the weight on day of EGJR consult as baseline. The paired t test and McNemar's test were used to compare weight and comorbidities between preoperative and postoperative time points. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients regained a mean of 42.8 ± 18.7% of the weight lost after gastric bypass. On day of EGJR consult, average was 116.1 ± 25.2 kg and BMI of 42.3 ± 8.5. Weight loss and %EBWL at follow-up was as follows: 10.7 ± 11.6 kg and 18.5 ± 18.2% at 6 months, 8.5 ± 11.5 kg and 14.9 ± 20.6% at 1 year, 6.9 ± 10.7 kg and 12.2 ± 19.8% at 2 years, 5.3 ± 9.1 kg and 8.7 ± 14.9% at 3 years, 3.1 ± 12.0 kg and 3.2 ± 21.6% at 4 years, and 3.9 ± 13.1 kg and 7.0 ± 23.8% at 5 years. The percentage of patients with obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes did not change over time. Patients who received a pursestring revision or had a greater percent reduction in stoma diameter had more significant %EBWL. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss after EGJR is sustained up to 5 years after revision with little effect on medical comorbidities. Patients with a greater reduction in stoma diameter experienced superior weight loss.

Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of using a functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP™) intra-operatively during hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication. Additionally, we hypothesize that these measurements correlate with long-term outcomes. METHODS: A prospectively maintained quality database was queried. Between 2013 and 2018, 175 patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication, the majority of which also had a hiatal hernia repair. The EndoFLIP™ was used to measure minimum diameter (Dmin), balloon pressure, and distensibility index (DI) at different timepoints throughout the operation. Clinical outcomes were measured up to 2 years after treatment. RESULTS: Crural closure and fundoplication resulted in a significant increase in balloon pressure and decrease in DI when compared to initial measurements as well as measurements taken after hernia reduction. After 1 year, patients with a final DI < 2.0 mm2/mmHg reported significantly more gas bloat and dysphagia than those with a final DI ≥ 2.0 mm2/mmHg (p = 0.040 and p = 0.025, respectively). This disparity became even more dramatic at 2 years (p = 0.006 and p = 0.004, respectively), with a final DI < 2.0 mm2/mmHg being significantly associated with higher prevalence of daily gas bloat (43.8% vs. 12.0%; p = 0.03). Additionally, patients with a final DI between 2.0 and 3.5 mm2/mmHg reported significantly lower Reflux Symptom Index scores at one year compared to those with a final DI < 2.0 or > 3.5 mm2/mmHg (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: EndoFLIP™ measurements correlate well with patient outcomes, with a final DI between 2 and 3.5 mm2/mmHg potentially being ideal. The EndoFLIP™ can be a useful adjunct in the operating room by providing objective measurements of esophageal distensibility after crural closure and fundoplication.

Endoscopic Suturing Results in High Technical and Clinical Success Rates for a Variety of Gastrointestinal Pathologies.

PURPOSE: We report our institution's experience with endoscopic suturing and hypothesize that it has high technical and clinical success. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent a procedure with the endoscopic suturing system between April 2010 and March 2019. Definitions of technical and clinical success were established for each application. RESULTS: Overall technical and clinical success in 151 procedures was 97.4% and 74.2%, respectively. Endoscopic suturing was used 24 times to treat leaks or fistulas, with a clinical success rate of 55.6%. The clinical success of stent fixations (11) was 72.7%. Intentional mucosal and submucosal defects were closed 20 times with a clinical success of 83.3%. Iatrogenic perforations (9) were repaired with a clinical success of 87.5%. Marginal ulcers were oversewn (5), with an 80% clinical success rate. Diverticulopexy in the esophagus was clinically successful in two patients. Endoscopic suturing was used in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in 10 patients and endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision in 70 patients; weight loss was observed in both groups at up to 2 and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic suturing was used successfully in numerous situations spanning the gastrointestinal tract with high rates of technical and clinical success.

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy: Evaluating safety, efficacy, and efficiency.

BACKGROUND: For many surgeons, a prior prostatectomy is considered a contraindication to laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of totally extraperitoneal in these patients. METHODS: This is a review of a prospectively collected hernia database evaluating patients who underwent totally extraperitoneal repair between October 2009 and March 2018. Patients with prior prostatectomy were matched to controls without prior prostatectomy. Secondary analysis compared the case group to patients who underwent open hernia repair. RESULTS: In the study, 1,751 patients underwent laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair. Thirty patients with a prior prostatectomy were matched to 90 controls. Operative duration was greater in the prostatectomy group (56 vs 36 minutes, P < .0001) and more peritoneal tears occurred (40% vs 12%, P = .002). Duration of stay, return to activity, complications, and rates of recurrence and chronic pain were equivalent. When compared with prior prostatectomy patients who underwent open hernia repair, the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal group had equivalent rates of complications and outcomes with a faster return to activities of daily living (3 vs 7 days P = .007). CONCLUSION: Despite a more difficult dissection, laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair in patients with prior prostatectomy is safe, efficacious, and efficient. In addition, totally extraperitoneal offers similar outcomes to open repair with a quicker recovery in this patient population.

Predictors for recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair in 979 patients.

BACKGROUND: Our study aims were to evaluate factors that predict recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair with either mesh or primary closure. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 1,125) undergoing open umbilical hernia repair from 2009 to 2018 were identified from a prospectively managed, quality database. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze recurrence-free survival for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze recurrence-free survival by age, sex, body mass index, concurrent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, smoking status, diabetes, postoperative infection, hernia size in greatest dimension, and type of repair. RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate was 3.3% with a median follow-up of 14 months. Univariable analysis revealed a difference in recurrence-free survival for current smoking (P = .039), diabetes (P = .007), higher body mass index (P = .057), and postoperative infection (P < .001). Multivariable analysis indicated higher body mass index (P = .007), concurrent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (P = .044), current smoking status (P = .020), diabetes (P = .021), and a primary closure repair of hernias ≥1.5 cm (P = .001) had a greater risk of recurrence. Postoperative infection showed an association with recurrence (P = .053). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate higher body mass index, concurrent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, current smoking, diabetes, primary closure repair of hernias ≥1.5 cm, and postoperative infection were associated with a greater risk of recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair.

Initial Experience with Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy, with Description and Video of Technique.

BACKGROUND: Gastric per oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a recently developed incisionless procedure to address gastroparesis. It has been previously described to treat medical and postsurgical gastroparesis. The present study is a case series of patients undergoing G-POEM for a variety of indications, both elective and urgent. METHODS: IRB approval was obtained for retrospective review of a prospectively collected database including patients who underwent G-POEM during a 1.5-year period. Using an upper endoscope, a mucosotomy is made 2 cm proximal to the pylorus on the anterior surface of the stomach. A submucosal tunnel is made to the pylorus muscle, which is completed incised. When possible, Endoflip® was used to evaluate pyloric distensibility before and after the myotomy. Patient demographic factors, additional procedures, and other follow-up were collected by chart review. Elective cases were offered repeat gastric emptying study at 6 months. RESULTS: There were 17 patients available for review. The procedure was technically completed in all cases. There was one gastric perforation recognized on postoperative day two that was addressed with laparoscopy and omental patch. Median length of stay was zero days, and 13/17 (76%) of patients experienced symptomatic relief. Pyloric distensibility significantly decreased intraoperatively from 5.6 (± 1.7) to 10.8 (± 5.0) cm2/mmHg (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This limited case series demonstrates G-POEM to be a versatile procedure able to address gastroparesis in a variety of settings. Success rates are congruent with previously published reports, and one serious complication was able to be addressed laparoscopically. Endoflip® was able to verify a successful myotomy intraoperatively. This procedure is an attractive alternative to less effective non-invasive treatments and a more invasive laparoscopic pyloroplasty.

Simulation training results in improvement of the management of operating room fires-A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Operating room (OR) fires are a preventable danger. Our aim is to examine the effectiveness of OR fire simulation scenarios as a supplement to classroom-based training for managing OR fires. METHODS: Eighty-two participants were randomly divided into 14 groups. Eight groups (Group S) participated in two simulations: one prior to the classroom-based fire training and another after the classroom. Six groups (Group D) participated in the identical classroom training, but only one simulation, which followed the classroom session. Confidence surveys were completed before classroom training and after the final simulation. All simulations were assessed by a blinded evaluator. RESULTS: Competency scores within Group S were significantly higher after the second simulation. Competency scores for Group S were significantly higher than Group D for the final test scenario. Prior to the classroom-based training, confidence scores regarding fire safety-related OR tasks were significantly higher in S group. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation training significantly improves both the competency and confidence of medical professionals in managing fires in the OR, with more simulation training showing a greater degree of benefit.

An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether use of self-fixating mesh during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) impacts postoperative quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize patients receiving self-fixating mesh during totally extraperitoneal (TEP) LIHR will report less pain and improved QoL compared to those receiving non-fixating mesh. METHODS: An IRB-approved, single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients with primary, unilateral inguinal hernias were randomized to receive either non-fixating (control) or self-fixating mesh. Clinical visits were conducted 3 weeks and 1 year after LIHR. A validated Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) instrument was used to assess patients' QoL preoperatively and postoperatively along with Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at 3 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Comparisons between self-fixating and non-fixating mesh groups were made using Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum or independent samples t tests. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy patients were enrolled (137 non-fixating vs 133 self-fixating). Preoperatively, there was no difference in mean age, BMI, or median hernia duration between groups (57.9 vs 56.6 years, p = 0.550; 26.1 vs 26.8, p = 0.534; 3.0 vs 3.0 months, p = 0.846). Median operative times (34 vs 34 min, p = 0.545) and LOS were similar. More patients in the non-fixating group received tacks (43 vs 19, p = 0.001). Patients receiving non-fixating mesh recorded better mean SOMS scores for the first 3 days following surgery (Day 1: p = 0.005; Day 2: p = 0.002; Day 3: p = 0.024, Table 1) indicating less pain. No differences in pain were seen 3 weeks or 1 year postoperatively. There were zero recurrences found during clinical follow-up in either of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving self-fixating mesh report worse postoperative pain in the first 2-3 days than those receiving non-fixating mesh. The groups showed no differences across QoL metrics (SOMS and CCS) at 3 weeks or 1 year postoperatively. Self-fixating mesh does not appear to positively impact QoL after TEP LIHR.

Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a complication of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). Previous research has identified predictive factors of POUR, such as age and history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). There is currently limited work on preventative measures. We hypothesize dexamethasone, a steroid, reduces POUR rates following LIHR due to its mechanism. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 979) undergoing LIHR from 2009 to 2017 at a single institution were selected from a prospectively managed database. All procedures were performed by four general surgeons. Only male patients were selected, as the majority of POUR occurs in males. Patients were retroactively chart reviewed and divided into two groups, dexamethasone use (n = 623) and no dexamethasone use (n = 356). Perioperative factors were compared between groups with Chi-square and independent samples t tests. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether dexamethasone use was associated with POUR. A subgroup analysis was performed on the dexamethasone group to determine any dose-dependent effects. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in POUR between the dexamethasone group and no dexamethasone group (3.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.0001). Patients in the dexamethasone group had a shorter length of stay, and were less likely to have BPH or a Foley placed (all p < 0.05). Age and BMI were similar between groups. Multivariable analysis showed that the use of dexamethasone was associated with a reduced risk of POUR (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.2-0.97, p = 0.0386), while controlling for factors such as age and BPH. A subgroup analysis examined the effect of dexamethasone per unit (mg) increase. There was no significant association between dexamethasone dose and POUR rates (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.82-1.38, p = 0.6241). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received dexamethasone showed a lower rate of POUR regardless of dose. These results suggest dexamethasone can be administered to reduce POUR in males undergoing LIHR.

Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision is more effective than medical management alone to address weight regain after RYGB.

BACKGROUND: Weight regain after bariatric roux-en-y gastric bypass affects up to 30% of individuals. Revisional surgery is risky, and is typically avoided in favor of dietary and psychological management. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision is a low-morbidity, outpatient procedure that may be more effective than medical management alone for regain after gastric bypass. METHODS: Two patient cohorts were retrospectively assembled. Both groups had gastric bypass, regained weight, and were cleared for revision by their surgeon, dietician, and psychologist. The revision group underwent the procedure, and the no-revision group did not, typically due to insurance issues. Weights from pre-bypass to 2 years post-revision, obesity-related comorbidities, and intraoperative factors were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: There were 41 patients included in the revision group and 14 in the no-revision group. Up to the time of revision procedure, body mass index, and % excess weight loss between groups were similar. After revision, the groups diverged over a 2-year period, with improvement seen in the revision group and worsening in the no-revision group. The revision group showed overall improvement in comorbidities compared to the no-revision group. Analysis of intraoperative factors suggests that gastric pouch restriction in addition to stoma diameter reduction may promote weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, endoscopic revision provided significantly greater weight loss compared to medical management alone. Results show that revision can help resolve obesity-related comorbidities. Analysis of intraoperative factors suggests that pouch reduction at time of stoma revision may improve weight loss.

Predicting Progression in Barrett's Esophagus: Development and Validation of the Barrett's Esophagus Assessment of Risk Score (BEAR Score).

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a scoring tool capable of accurately predicting which patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) will progress to dysplasia and/or esophageal adenocarcinoma. BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapies have emerged capable of eradicating BE with high efficacy and low complication rates, but which patients should receive treatment is still debated. Current knowledge of risk factors is insufficient to allow for the accurate prediction of which patients will progress to dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from a cohort of BE patients over a 13-year period. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to predict progression. A simplified risk of progression (ROP) score was developed from weighted beta coefficients. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap analysis, and model discrimination was assessed using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The cohort included 2591 BE patients of which 133 progressed to dysplasia/adenocarcinoma. Multivariable analysis with bootstrap internal validation resulted in 5 variables associated with an increased ROP (age ≥70 years, male sex, lack of proton-pump inhibitor use, segment greater than 3 cm, and history of esophageal candidiasis). Using this model, we developed a simple ROP score between 0 and 8. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed a cutoff of 3 or higher to have a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 79%, respectively. Patients with a score of 3 or higher had an odds ratio of 9.04 (95% confidence interval 6.06-13.46). The c-statistic obtained from 10-fold cross-validation was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.79), indicating good overall discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show the development and internal validation of the Barrett's Esophagus Assessment of Risk Score as capable of quantifying the likelihood of progression to dysplasia/adenocarcinoma. The Barrett's Esophagus Assessment of Risk Score can be used clinically to guide treatment decisions in nondysplastic BE patients.

Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used.

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been considered a relative contraindication to peritoneal dialysis (PD). Surprisingly, PD catheter dysfunction rates and longevity have not been studied in the growing obese ESRD population. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of patient weight on PD catheter survival in the three insertion technique categories of advanced laparoscopy (AL), basic laparoscopy (BL), and open. METHODS: We examine retrospectively collected data on 231 consecutive PD catheter insertions at the NorthShore University HealthSystem between 2004 and 2014. Three cohorts were created based on the catheter insertion technique: open, BL using selective adhesiolysis, and AL using rectus sheath tunnel, selective omentopexy, and adhesiolysis. Primary outcomes included catheter dysfunction and catheter dysfunction-free survival for each cohort by BMI: normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), obese (≥30). Nominal variables were compared using Chi-square test, continuous variables using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests, and catheter survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. Statistical significance was established at 0.05. RESULTS: For the three BMI categories, there were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics. There were no statistically significant differences in catheter dysfunction or peri-operative complications by BMI category among all patients. This was also true in the AL cohort. Among all patients, similar 2-year dysfunction-free catheter survival was noted for normal weight, overweight, and obese patients (log-rank p = 0.79). This was also true across all insertion techniques: open (log-rank p = 0.87), BL (log-rank p = 0.41), AL (log-rank p = 0.43). In the obese cohort, the 2-year dysfunction-free catheter survival was 91.1% in AL, 83.5% in BL, and 65.7% in open (log-rank p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Obesity does not increase complications or shorten dysfunction-free PD catheter survival regardless of the operative technique used. Obesity should not be considered as a relative contraindication to PD catheter placement as it confers similar technique success to normal- and overweight individuals.

Quality of life after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of an asymptomatic inguinal hernia.

BACKGROUND: When considering an asymptomatic inguinal hernia, surgeons must weigh the risks of watchful waiting against the risk of operative complications. Laparoscopy offers the benefit of reduced postoperative pain, which, for appropriate surgical candidates, may strengthen the case for repair. This study compares general and disease-specific quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) of asymptomatic and symptomatic hernias. METHODS: We summarize prospective data from 387 patients who underwent TEP LIHR between 2009 and 2015 by four surgeons at a single institution. Asymptomatic individuals were identified by pain scores of zero at preoperative clinic visits. Validated quality of life (QOL) measurements were administered preoperatively and at 3 weeks, 6 months, and 1-year postop. Comparisons were made using Chi-square test, t test, or Mann-Whitney U test. Changes over time were assessed using longitudinal mixed effects models. RESULTS: A cohort of 79 asymptomatic cases were compared to 308 symptomatic individuals. The asymptomatic cohort had larger median hernia defects (2.5 vs 2 cm, p < 0.01), was older (mean 63.0 vs 58.9 years, p = 0.03), included fewer indirect hernias (57.7 vs 74.9%, p < 0.01), took pain medication for fewer days (mean 1.2 ± 1.5 vs 2.2 ± 3.0 days, p = 0.02), returned to baseline activities of daily living earlier (median 3 vs 5 days, p < 0.01), and reported decreased postoperative pain (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in general QOL. There was one recurrence in the asymptomatic group and were two in the symptomatic cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic individuals undergoing TEP LIHR reported less postoperative pain, returned to baseline activities, and discontinued pain medication sooner than symptomatic patients. These results are encouraging and may inform patient-centered discussions about asymptomatic hernia repair.

Video review program enhances resident training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia: a randomized blinded controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to determine if a standardized video review program for residents improves operative performance. METHODS: Participation was offered to surgical residents rotating on a minimally invasive service. Residents were randomized to either the video review group or no video review group. Every participant in the video review group underwent video reviews with an attending surgeon for 30 min once weekly during their 1-month rotation. A blinded surgeon evaluated performance in the operating room using validated assessment tools. The amount of time the resident spent as primary surgeon was recorded. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the video and no video review groups. Differences were considered statistically significant for p values < 0.05. RESULTS: Sixteen residents were randomized to the video review group (n = 8) or the no video review group (n = 8). Residents in the video review cohort significantly improved in creating a working space (p = 0.04), hernia sac reduction (p = 0.01), mesh placement (p = 0.01), knowledge of the procedure (p = 0.01), and overall competence (p = 0.02). Residents in the no video review group did not significantly improve in five of seven categories. The video review group significantly increased the time spent as primary surgeon (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Video review with a coach proved to be beneficial for residents when learning laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. We conclude that systematic video review is a good supplemental tool in resident surgical training.

Long-term patterns and predictors of pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a patient-centered analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been shown to offer patients the benefit of less postoperative pain as compared to traditional open techniques. However, the risk of experiencing significant postoperative pain may affect patient's decision making. We aimed to elucidate potential patterns of pain and the predictors of such, up to 2 years postoperatively, using both generic and specific quality of life tools. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Short form-36, Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) and Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) surveys were administered pre- and postoperatively at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years. Patients with concomitant procedures were excluded. Significant pain was considered mild but bothersome or worse on either specific tool (SOMS scores ≥3/4, CCS scores ≥2). Predictors of significant pain were determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2015, 482 patients enrolled in our database underwent elective TEP repair of 626 hernias and completed an assessment tool. Mean age was 57 (±15) years, with 93 % male. Reported pain on all three tools improved significantly from baseline over time (p < 0.01). Significant pain on either specific tool, related or unrelated to surgery, was reported by 52 % of respondents (158/301) preoperatively, and postoperatively by 50 % at 3 weeks (111/220), 21 % at 6 months (15/70), 13 % at 1 year (14/108), and 25 % at 2 years (30/121). Significant pain at 6 months-2 years correlated more significantly with general health status than surgical factors. CONCLUSIONS: Significant pain can be as high as 50 % at 3 weeks on surgery-specific quality of life measures, but with significant improvement by 6 months which is maintained through 2 years. Poor quality of life and general health were the main predictors of pain after 6 months.

Outcomes in patients with over 1-year follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a promising therapy in the treatment of achalasia. The study was designed to report outcomes, including quality of life, in patients with at least 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients from an institutional review board-approved protocol underwent POEM and were followed prospectively. Health-related quality of life was measured preoperatively and 1 year post-operatively using Short Form-36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). Comparisons were made with patients from a prospective database who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) over the same period. Paired t tests were used to analyze all normally distributed data, while Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyze SF-36 data, as it does not follow a normal distribution. RESULTS: We analyzed 41 consecutive POEM patients with at least 1-year follow-up. Significant improvements in quality of life between baseline and 1 year were found in role limitations due to physical health (81.8 ± 25.8 vs. 65.9 ± 31.6, p = 0.01) and social functioning (83 ± 19.1 vs. 64.6 ± 31.3, p = 0.01). When compared to 24 patients who underwent LHM, there was no difference in average Eckardt scores (0.9 ± 1.6 vs. 1.0 ± 1.3, p > 0.05) or incidence of PPI use (43.5 vs. 47.5 %, p = 0.71). However, when looking at just type III patients, POEM patients had a higher remission rate (100 vs. 62.5 %) and significantly lower post-operative Eckardt scores at 1 year (1.1 vs. 3.1, p < 0.05). The average myotomy length of type III achalasia patients undergoing POEM was 18.6 cm (±6.9) compared to 10.3 cm (±1.0) in LHM patients (p < 0.01), which may have contributed to this difference. CONCLUSION: POEM provides a significant quality of life benefit at 1 year while having similar relief of dysphagia and post-operative PPI use compared to LHM. Type III achalasia patients may have better outcomes with POEM compared to LHM.