Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hum Reprod ; 36(1): 82-86, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33147330

ABSTRACT

To date, vaginal/cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCAC) has not been reported in the granddaughters of women treated with diethylstilbestrol (DES) during pregnancy. We present an 8-year-old girl with a history of severe vaginal bleeding who was diagnosed with cervical CCAC. She underwent fertility-sparing surgery and radiotherapy. No sign of recurrence was detected throughout a 10-year follow-up. Her grandmother had received DES therapy during pregnancy with the patient's mother. Although no direct causal link is demonstrated, this case raises for the first time, the hypothesis of multigenerational effects of DES in girls and strongly suggests the need to follow the granddaughters of DES-treated women.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell , Endocrine Disruptors , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/chemically induced , Cervix Uteri , Child , Diethylstilbestrol/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Pregnancy
2.
BMJ Open ; 7(10): e017321, 2017 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29084796

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prenatal care is recommended during pregnancy to improve neonatal and maternal outcomes. Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) are less compliant to recommended prenatal care and suffer a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Several attempts to encourage optimal pregnancy follow-up have shown controversial results, particularly in high-income countries. Few studies have assessed financial incentives to encourage prenatal care, and none reported materno-fetal events as the primary outcome. Our study aims to determine whether financial incentives could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with low SES in a high-income country. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic cluster-randomised clinical trial includes pregnant women with the following criteria: (1) age above 18 years, (2) first pregnancy visit before 26 weeks of gestation and (3) belonging to a socioeconomically disadvantaged group. The intervention consists in offering financial incentives conditional on attending scheduled pregnancy follow-up consultations. Clusters are 2-month periods with random turnover across centres. A composite outcome of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include maternal or neonatal outcomes assessed separately, qualitative assessment of the perception of the intervention and cost-effectiveness analysis for which children will be followed to the end of their first year through the French health insurance database. The study started in June 2016, and based on an expected decrease in the primary endpoint from 18% to 14% in the intervention group, we plan to include 2000 women in each group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was first gained on 28 September 2014. An independent data security and monitoring committee has been established. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary analyses will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02402855; pre-results.


Subject(s)
Motivation , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Care/economics , Social Class , Adult , Female , Fetus , France , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant Health/economics , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Health/economics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/economics , Referral and Consultation , Research Design , Vulnerable Populations , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...