The implications of the feminization of the primary care physician workforce on service supply: a systematic review.

There is a widespread perception that the increasing proportion of female physicians in most developed countries is contributing to a primary care service shortage because females work less and provide less patient care compared with their male counterparts. There has, however, been no comprehensive investigation of the effects of primary care physician (PCP) workforce feminization on service supply. We undertook a systematic review to examine the current evidence that quantifies the effect of feminization on time spent working, intensity and scope of work, and practice characteristics. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science from 1991 to 2013 using variations of the terms 'primary care', 'women', 'manpower', and 'supply and distribution'; screened the abstracts of all articles; and entered those meeting our inclusion criteria into a data abstraction tool. Original research comparing male to female PCPs on measures of years of practice, time spent working, intensity of work, scope of work, or practice characteristics was included. We screened 1,271 unique abstracts and selected 74 studies for full-text review. Of these, 34 met the inclusion criteria. Years of practice, hours of work, intensity of work, scope of work, and practice characteristics featured in 12%, 53%, 42%, 50%, and 21% of studies respectively. Female PCPs self-report fewer hours of work than male PCPs, have fewer patient encounters, and deliver fewer services, but spend longer with their patients during a contact and deal with more separate presenting problems in one visit. They write fewer prescriptions but refer to diagnostic services and specialist physicians more often. The studies included in this review suggest that the feminization of the workforce is likely to have a small negative impact on the availability of primary health care services, and that the drivers of observed differences between male and female PCPs are complex and nuanced. The true scale of the impact of these findings on future effective physician supply is difficult to determine with currently available evidence, given that few studies looked at trends over time, and results from those that did are inconsistent. Additional research examining gender differences in practice patterns and scope of work is warranted.

Nurse anaesthetic care during cataract surgery: a comparative quality assurance study.

BACKGROUND: We studied whether a new model of nurse-provision of conscious sedation for cataract surgery maintained patient satisfaction and safety. METHODS: We prospectively and non-randomly studied 106 patients who had outpatient cataract surgery on a day when an anaesthetist was present at the UBC, Vancouver Hospital Eye Care Centre, and 105 patients with no anaesthetist, but instead a surgical suite nurse trained to give conscious sedation was present. Questionnaires determined patient perception of well-being, pain, and anxiety before surgery, before discharge, at 48 hours and at 6 weeks postoperative. Hospital records and a surgeon questionnaire were used to determine complications. Ophthalmology records were used to determine visual acuity (preoperative and at 6 weeks). RESULTS: No anaesthetic complications were reported in either group and there were no significant differences in surgical complications. Patient responses to assessments of discomfort, well-being, and anxiety, preoperatively and postoperatively, were very similar on the nurse days and anaesthetist days. INTERPRETATION: Conscious sedation of cataract surgery patients can be safely and effectively provided by a trained nurse for selected patients. This nursing role is likely replicable in similar operating room settings.

High reliability versus high autonomy: Dryden, Murphy and patient safety.

Healthcare is not a high-reliability industry. The adverse event rate is on the order of 10(-2); industries such as aviation, nuclear power and railways achieve rates of 10(-5) or better. Increasing awareness of this contrast has made "patient safety" a major topic of concern. High reliability in other industries flows from a combination of "engineered safety," tight regulation ("high-level constraints") and the development of a "culture of safety" that recognizes error as a systemic rather than a personal failure. In medicine, achieving such a combination would involve abandoning deeply embedded and centuries-old traditions of individualism, clinical autonomy and personal responsibility. This will not happen. Watch instead for safety concerns to be diverted into activities that do not threaten core values.

Phantoms in the snow: Canadians' use of health care services in the United States.

To examine the extent to which Canadian residents seek medical care across the border, we collected data about Canadians' use of services from ambulatory care facilities and hospitals located in Michigan, New York State, and Washington State during 1994-1998. We also collected information from several Canadian sources, including the 1996 National Population Health Survey, the provincial Ministries of Health, and the Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association. Results from these sources do not support the widespread perception that Canadian residents seek care extensively in the United States. Indeed, the numbers found are so small as to be barely detectible relative to the use of care by Canadians at home.