Clinical, Pathological, and Surgical Outcomes for Adult Pineoblastomas.

INTRODUCTION: Pineoblastomas are uncommon primitive neuroectodermal tumors that occur mostly in children; they are exceedingly rare in adults. Few published reports have compared the various aspects of these tumors between adults and children. METHODS: The authors report a series of 12 pineoblastomas in adults from 2 institutions over 24 years. The clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features and clinical outcomes were compared with previously reported cases in children and adults. RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 24 to 81 years, and all but 1 patient exhibited symptoms of obstructive hydrocephalus. Three patients underwent gross total resection, and subtotal resection was performed in 3 patients. Diagnostic biopsy specimens were obtained in an additional 6 patients. Pathologically, the tumors had the classical morphologic and immunohistochemical features of pineoblastomas. Postoperatively, 10 patients received radiotherapy, and 5 patients received chemotherapy. Compared with previously reported cases, several differences were noted in clinical outcomes. Of the 12 patients, only 5 (42%) died of their disease (average length of survival, 118 months); 5 patients (42%) are alive with no evidence of disease (average length of follow-up, 92 months). One patient died of unrelated causes, and one was lost to follow-up. Patients with subtotal resections or diagnostic biopsies did not suffer a worse prognosis. Of the 9 patients with biopsy or subtotal resection, 4 are alive, 4 died of their disease, and 1 died of an unrelated hemorrhagic cerebral infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Although this series is small, the data suggest that pineoblastomas in adults have a less aggressive clinical course than in children.

Relative cerebral blood volume from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in the grading of pediatric primary brain tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) data from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion in grading pediatric primary brain tumors. METHODS: A retrospective blinded review of 63 pediatric brain tumors with DSC perfusion was performed independently by two neuroradiologists. A diagnosis of low- versus high-grade tumor was obtained from conventional imaging alone. Maximum rCBV (rCBVmax) was measured from manual ROI placement for each reviewer and averaged. Whole-tumor CBV data was obtained from a semi-automated approach. Results from all three analyses were compared to WHO grade. RESULTS: Based on conventional MRI, the two reviewers had a concordance rate of 81% (k = 0.62). Compared to WHO grade, the concordant cases accurately diagnosed high versus low grade in 82%. A positive correlation was demonstrated between manual rCBVmax and tumor grade (r = 0.30, P = 0.015). ROC analysis of rCBVmax (area under curve 0.65, 0.52-0.77, P = 0.03) gave a low-high threshold of 1.38 with sensitivity of 92% (74-99%), specificity of 40% (24-57%), NPV of 88% (62-98%), and PPV of 50% (35-65%) Using this threshold on 12 discordant tumors between evaluators from conventional imaging yielded correct diagnoses in nine patients. Semi-automated analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences between low- and high-grade tumors for multiple metrics including average rCBV (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant positive correlation with tumor grade, rCBV from pediatric brain tumors demonstrates limited specificity, but high NPV in excluding high-grade neoplasms. In selective patients whose conventional imaging is nonspecific, an rCBV threshold may have further diagnostic value.

Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations: a review article.

Communicating the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a planned medical intervention is integral to high-quality patient care. When effective, such communication promotes patient autonomy, alleviates unfounded patient apprehension, and mitigates medicolegal liability. The topic of medical radiation adds to the usual challenges of effective medical communication some special challenges of its own. Among these is a lack of understanding by the general population and health professionals of the benefits and risks of medical radiation, which is compounded by unfamiliar terminology and units of measure. This is further complicated by the fact that many patients have poor comprehension of risk data in general. In this article, the authors present a case, review the ethical basis and legal history of informed consent, and explore the current initiatives, available resources, and further opportunities related to this challenging topic.