Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gastroenterol Nurs ; 44(6): 403-411, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34411014

ABSTRACT

Pediatric endoscopy is an essential clinical practice used to diagnose and treat gastrointestinal diseases in children. Moreover, pediatric endoscopy programs require a clinically and technically specialized unit organized around performing endoscopic procedures with high levels of training and skill. With the volume of endoscopic procedures steadily rising in large academic medical centers each year, achieving operational efficiency has become critical to running a successful endoscopy program.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Diseases , Total Quality Management , Academic Medical Centers , Child , Endoscopy , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Humans
2.
JPGN Rep ; 2(4): e116, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37206447

ABSTRACT

Despite expert recommendations, clinician's adherence to pediatric societal clinical practice guidelines is variable, particularly with respect to the use of gastric biopsy culture in the initial diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. In addition, the implementation of routine use of gastric biopsy culture has been challenging with several factors affecting the rate of successful primary H pylori culture. Methods: We conducted a quality improvement (QI) project with the aims of increasing the rate of successful primary culture. The QI project involved educational efforts among our gastroenterologists, endoscopy suite personnel, and laboratory personnel. We compared the frequency of gastric biopsy culture sent in patients with international classification of diseases 9th revision code 041.86, and 10th revision codes B96.81 evaluated by pediatric gastroenterologists at Boston Children's Hospital during the 9 months before the QI intervention (February 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019) and 9 months after the QI intervention (November 1 2019 to July 31 2020). We also compared the rate of culture growth in patients with positive histology (culture positivity), and antimicrobial susceptibilities before and after November 1, 2019. Results: We observed an increased frequency of gastric biopsy acquisition by any gastroenterologist, obtained in 39% (28 of 71) preintervention patients compared with 67% (36 of 54) intervention patients (P = 0.004). There was an increase in the percentage of culture positivity across study periods from 21% (3 of 14) preintervention to 45% (5 of 11) postintervention (P = 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-7.00). Conclusion: Educational initiatives and collaborative work with staff physicians, endoscopy personnel, and hospital laboratory appear to be effective tools to increase usage of gastric biopsy culture as a diagnostic tool for H pylori infection and to increase culture positivity. Improving the surveillance of local resistance rates will improve the selection of the most effective primary treatment in specific geographic areas.

3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(2): 131-135, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27817757

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE The maximum safe storage interval after endoscope reprocessing remains unknown. We assessed the association between storage interval and endoscope contamination to evaluate the need for scope reprocessing prior to use. METHODS We conducted a study in 2 phases. In phase 1, we cultured 9 gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes that had been stored for at least 7 days since reprocessing. Each scope was cultured in 3 places: external surfaces of hand piece, insertion tube, and internal channels. In phase 2, after reprocessing these scopes, we hung and cultured them prospectively in a similar fashion at 1-, 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-week intervals without patient use. We defined clinically relevant contamination as >100 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). RESULTS In phase 1, median hang time was 69 days (range, 8-555 days). Considering the 27 total cultures, 3 of 27 GI endoscopes (11.1%) had positive cultures, all with nonpathogenic skin flora at ≤100 CFU/mL. Median hang time was not statistically different between scopes with positive and negative cultures (P=.82). In phase 2, 7 of 131 prospective cultures (5.3%) from 6 of 9 GI endoscopes at varying storage intervals were positive, all at ≤100 CFU/mL. At 56 days after reprocessing (the longest storage interval studied), 1 of 24 cultures (4.2%) was positive (100 CFU/mL of Bacillus species from external biopsy/suction ports). CONCLUSIONS No endoscopes demonstrated clinically relevant contamination at hang times ranging from 7 to 555 days, and most scopes remained uncontaminated up to 56 days after reprocessing. Our data suggest that properly cleaned and disinfected GI endoscopes could be stored safely for longer intervals than currently recommended. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2017;38:131-135.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal/microbiology , Equipment Contamination , Equipment Reuse , Fungi/growth & development , Colony Count, Microbial , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disinfection/methods , Hospital Units , Humans , Massachusetts , Pediatrics , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...