ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Association of surgical treatment combined to frozen section biopsies appears to be one of the most appropriate therapeutic solution for the treatment of skin carcinomas. We report our experience on 269 tumors assessed with frozen sections. Our goal was to first study the benefit of a one-time surgical approach, then to better target the tumors eligible for this examination and finally to number the difference between frozen section and final histology studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 269 tumors, operated on an outpatient basis with frozen section followed later by a final histology study. All being performed by the same team of surgeons and pathologist. Only previously biopsied and diagnosed basal cell or squamous cell tumors were included. The recorded data were: location of tumor; histological type; involved margins; number of cuts; differences between frozen section and final histological studies, which conduct to a two-time surgical approach; number of tumors for which frozen section was impossible during surgery and that lead to a two-time surgical approach; type of reconstruction; number of recurrence. RESULTS: The follow up was 48 months (26.6 to 78.1). Histogical analyses were carried on basal cell carcinoma (92%), squamous cell carcinoma (8%) with a topographic distribution mainly in face and neck (72%). Of the 269 tumors excised, 207 representing 77% had a sufficient safety margin, 62 representing 23% had at least one invaded bank that required further surgical resection. We found seven cases of two-time surgical approach. In three cases, it was secondary to medical decision because of a technical difficulty of histologists. In one case, histological diagnosis can't be obtained by frozen section study. In three cases, we found a difference between frozen section and final study. CONCLUSION: The benefit provided by the frozen section takes its value in the treatment of face and neck tumors, whose optimal margins are sometimes difficult to obtain and minimal scar ransom necessary. A one-time surgery was made possible to us thanks to this fast examination. The low rate of second surgery and recurrence allows us to demonstrate the reliability of this technique.
