Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Heart Failure , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Thrombosis , Humans , Mitral Valve , Prosthesis FailureABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report the experience of the Portugal Centre For Evidence Based Practice (PCEBP): a JBI Centre of Excellence in the training of health professionals, researchers, and professors in the Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program, a course on Evidence Synthesis, specifically on Systematic Literature Reviews. METHOD: This article aims to report the experience of the Portugal Centre For Evidence Based Practice: a JBI Centre of Excellence in the implementation of the Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program that trains health professionals, researchers, and teachers to develop Systematic Reviews, according to the JBI approach. RESULTS: By the end of 2020, 11 editions of the course had been developed with 136 participants from different educational and health institutions, from different countries. As a result of the training of these participants, 13 systematic reviews were published in JBI Evidence Synthesis and 10 reviews were published in other journals. CONCLUSION: The reported results and the students' satisfaction evaluation allow us to emphasize the relevance of the course for health professionals training on evidence synthesis.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Practice , Health Personnel , Humans , Portugal , Systematic Reviews as TopicABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To report the experience of the Portugal Centre For Evidence Based Practice (PCEBP): a JBI Centre of Excellence in the training of health professionals, researchers, and professors in the Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program, a course on Evidence Synthesis, specifically on Systematic Literature Reviews. Method: This article aims to report the experience of the Portugal Centre For Evidence Based Practice: a JBI Centre of Excellence in the implementation of the Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program that trains health professionals, researchers, and teachers to develop Systematic Reviews, according to the JBI approach. Results: By the end of 2020, 11 editions of the course had been developed with 136 participants from different educational and health institutions, from different countries. As a result of the training of these participants, 13 systematic reviews were published in JBI Evidence Synthesis and 10 reviews were published in other journals. Conclusion: The reported results and the students' satisfaction evaluation allow us to emphasize the relevance of the course for health professionals training on evidence synthesis.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Relatar la experiencia del Portugal Centre For Evidence Based Practice (PCEBP): a JBI Centre of Excellence en la formación de profesionales de salud, investigadores y docentes en el Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program, un curso en Síntesis de la Evidencia, específicamente sobre Revisiones Sistemáticas de la Literatura. Método: Este artículo tiene como objetivo relatar la experiencia del Portugal Centre For Evidence Based Practice: a JBI Centre of Excellence en la implementación del Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program que capacita profesionales de salud, investigadores y docentes para el desarrollo de Revisiones Sistemáticas, según la metodología del JBI. Resultados: Hasta el final del año 2020, fueron desarrolladas 11 ediciones del curso sumando en total 136 participantes provenientes de diferentes instituciones de enseñanza y de salud, de distintos países. Resultó tras la formación de estos participantes que, 13 revisiones sistemáticas fueron publicadas en la JBI Evidence Synthesis y 10 revisiones fueron publicadas en otras revistas. Conclusión: Los referidos resultados y la evaluación de satisfacción de los egresos nos permiten resaltar la pertinencia del curso para la formación en síntesis de evidencia de profesionales de salud.
RESUMO Objetivo: Relatar a experiência do Portugal Centre For Evidence Based Practice (PCEBP): a JBI Centre of Excellence na formação de profissionais de saúde, pesquisadores e docentes no Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program, um curso em Síntese da Evidência, especificamente sobre Revisões Sistemáticas da Literatura. Método: Este artigo tem como objetivo relatar a experiência do Portugal Centre For Evidence Based Practice: a JBI Centre of Excellence na implementação do Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program que capacita profissionais de saúde, pesquisadores e docentes para o desenvolvimento de Revisões Sistemáticas, segundo a abordagem do JBI. Resultados: Até o final do ano 2020, foram desenvolvidas 11 edições do curso com um total de 136 participantes provenientes de diferentes instituições de ensino e de saúde, de diferentes países. Resultante da formação destes participantes, 13 revisões sistemáticas foram publicadas na JBI Evidence Synthesis e 10 revisões foram publicadas noutras revistas. Conclusão: Os referidos resultados e a avaliação de satisfação dos formados nos permitem realçar a pertinência do curso para a formação em síntese de evidência de profissionais de saúde.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Evidence-Based Practice , Health Personnel , Professional Training , Systematic ReviewABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the longterm psychological outcome in survivors of critical illness after intensive care unit discharge. METHODS: A prospective cohort of survivors admitted to a mixed intensive care unit between January and September 2010 was evaluated six months and five years after hospital discharge. The Dementia Rating Scale-2, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Posttraumatic stress syndrome 14-questions inventory, the Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5-D), and the Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) were assessed at both follow-up periods. RESULTS: Of 267 patients, 25 patients were evaluated at 6 months after discharge (62 ± 16 years); 12 (48%) presented cognitive impairment, 6 (24%) anxiety, 4 (16%) depression, and 4 (16%) post-traumatic stress disorder. Among those re-evaluated five years after discharge (n = 17; 65 ± 15 years), the frequency of cognitive impairment dropped from 8 (47%) to 3 (18%) (p = 0.063), due to improvement in these patients over time, and other patients did not acquire any dysfunction after discharge. At five years after discharge, only two patients (12%) reported anxiety, and none had depression or post-traumatic stress disorder. No differences were found between the six-month and five-year follow-ups regarding EQ-5-D and EQ VAS. CONCLUSION: Survivors do not show a progressive decline in cognitive function or quality of life within five years after intensive care unit discharge. Psychopathological symptoms tend to decrease with time.
Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Critical Care/psychology , Critical Illness/psychology , Survivors/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Quality of Life , Time FactorsABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar o desfecho psicológico em longo prazo em sobreviventes de doenças críticas, após alta da unidade de terapia intensiva. Métodos: Avaliou-se coorte prospectiva de pacientes sobreviventes após admissão a uma unidade de terapia intensiva mista entre janeiro e setembro de 2010, 6 meses e 5 anos após a alta hospitalar. Aplicaram-se em todos os momentos as seguintes escalas: Dementia Rating Scale-2, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome 14-Questions Inventory, Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5-D) e Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). Resultados: Dentre 267 pacientes, 25 foram avaliados após 6 meses (idade: 62 ± 16 anos). Aos 6 meses, 48% apresentavam comprometimento cognitivo; 24% ansiedade, 16% depressão e 16% transtorno de estresse pós-traumático. Foram reavaliados 5 anos após a alta 17 pacientes, com idade: 65 ± 15 anos. Dentre eles, a frequência de comprometimento cognitivo caiu de 47% para 18% (p = 0,063), em razão da melhora destes pacientes ao longo do tempo e do não surgimento desta condição em outros pacientes após a alta. Ainda após 5 anos, apenas 12% da amostra relatou ansiedade, e nenhum tinha depressão ou transtorno de estresse pós-traumático. Não se encontraram diferenças em termos das escalas EQ-5-D e EQ VAS entre as avaliações após 6 meses e 5 anos. Conclusão: Os sobreviventes não apresentaram declínio progressivo da função cognitiva ou da qualidade de vida dentro de 5 anos após a alta da unidade de terapia intensiva. Os sintomas psicopatológicos tenderam a diminuir com o tempo.
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the longterm psychological outcome in survivors of critical illness after intensive care unit discharge. Methods: A prospective cohort of survivors admitted to a mixed intensive care unit between January and September 2010 was evaluated six months and five years after hospital discharge. The Dementia Rating Scale-2, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Posttraumatic stress syndrome 14-questions inventory, the Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5-D), and the Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) were assessed at both follow-up periods. Results: Of 267 patients, 25 patients were evaluated at 6 months after discharge (62 ± 16 years); 12 (48%) presented cognitive impairment, 6 (24%) anxiety, 4 (16%) depression, and 4 (16%) post-traumatic stress disorder. Among those re-evaluated five years after discharge (n = 17; 65 ± 15 years), the frequency of cognitive impairment dropped from 8 (47%) to 3 (18%) (p = 0.063), due to improvement in these patients over time, and other patients did not acquire any dysfunction after discharge. At five years after discharge, only two patients (12%) reported anxiety, and none had depression or post-traumatic stress disorder. No differences were found between the six-month and five-year follow-ups regarding EQ-5-D and EQ VAS. Conclusion: Survivors do not show a progressive decline in cognitive function or quality of life within five years after intensive care unit discharge. Psychopathological symptoms tend to decrease with time.