Reductions in rearfoot eversion posture due to proximal muscle strengthening are dependent on foot-ankle varus alignment.

BACKGROUND: Strengthening the hip and trunk muscles may decrease foot pronation in upright standing due to expected increases in hip passive torque and lower-limb external rotation. However, considering the increased pronation caused by a more varus foot-ankle alignment, subjects with more varus may experience smaller or no postural changes after strengthening. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of hip and trunk muscle strengthening on lower-limb posture during upright standing and hip passive torque of women with more and less varus alignment. METHODS: This nonrandomized controlled experimental study included 50 young, able-bodied women. The intervention group (n = 25) performed hip and trunk muscle strengthening exercises, and the control group (n = 25) maintained their usual activities. Each group was split into two subgroups: those with more and less varus alignment. Hip, shank, and rearfoot-ankle posture and hip passive external rotation torque were evaluated. Mixed analyses of variance and preplanned contrasts were used to assess prepost changes and between-group differences (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The less-varus subgroup of the intervention group had a reduced rearfoot eversion posture (P = 0.02). No significant changes were observed in the less-varus subgroup of the control group (P = 0.31). There were no significant differences in posture between the control and intervention groups when varus was not considered (P ≥ 0.06). The intervention group had increased hip passive torque (P = 0.001) compared to the control group, independent of varus alignment. CONCLUSION: Despite the increases in hip passive torque, the rearfoot eversion posture was reduced only in women with a less-varus alignment. Having more foot-ankle varus may prevent eversion reductions.

Hip passive stiffness is associated with midfoot passive stiffness.

BACKGROUND: Hip motion in the transverse plane is coupled with foot motion in the frontal plane during closed kinematic activities, such as gait. Considering that movement patterns and bone alignment might influence passive mechanical properties of joints in the long term, it is possible that hip passive stiffness and foot complex stiffness and alignment are related to each other. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether hip passive stiffness, midfoot passive stiffness and shank-forefoot alignment are related to each other. METHOD: Thirty healthy adult individuals with a mean age of 25.4 years participated (18 women and 12 men). The Foot Torsimeter was used to measure midfoot stiffness, and hip stiffness and foot alignment were measured using clinical measures. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to test the associations between each pair of variables, with α = 0.05. RESULTS: Hip stiffness was positively correlated with midfoot absolute stiffness (r = 0.41, p = 0.02), indicating that increased hip stiffness is associated with increased midfoot stiffness. There were no associations between shank-forefoot alignment and the other variables. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical settings, individuals with reduced hip passive stiffness may also have reduced midfoot passive stiffness, and vice versa. Shank-forefoot alignment is not linearly associated with hip or midfoot passive stiffness.