ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Congenital syphilis disproportionately affects individuals impacted by adverse social determinants of health. Understanding these determinants may help facilitate holistic care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of mother-infant dyads with potential congenital syphilis in a Missouri hospital system. Cases were classified per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention clinical scenarios. Information was collected regarding demographics, prenatal care, substance use, and other social factors. Dyads with confirmed/highly probable or possible congenital syphilis ("congenital syphilis outcomes") were compared to those with less likely/unlikely congenital syphilis ("non-congenital syphilis outcomes") using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We identified 131 dyads with infant dates of birth from 12/2015-6/2022: 74 (56%) with congenital syphilis outcomes and 56 (43%) with non-congenital syphilis outcomes. Most mothers were Black/African American (n = 84, 65%) and lived in areas with high Social Vulnerability Indices. Many had inadequate prenatal care (n = 61, 47%) and/or substance use histories (n = 55, 42%). Significant associations with congenital syphilis outcomes included limited prenatal care (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.38-6.56), no prenatal care (OR 16.08, 95% CI 1.96-132.11), substance use (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.61-7.25), housing instability (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.39-8.38), and justice system interactions (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.00-5.24). Substance use correlated with prenatal care adequacy (p < 0.001). 30% of infants with congenital syphilis outcomes were taken into protective custody. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse social determinants of health are common in dyads impacted by congenital syphilis. Health systems should consider interdisciplinary programming to improve testing and linkage to care. Future studies should evaluate social support for congenital syphilis prevention and management.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic reduced the general accessibility of health services. Many sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and treatment sites modified services (e.g., reduced hours, limited walk-in availability, decreased testing capacity), changes that may result in permanent change in STI service availability. At the same time, systems were driven to innovate in ways that could benefit patients. This study aimed to describe how the COVID-19 pandemic changed STI clinical services, with a focus on long-term impacts. METHODS: In July 2022, a phone survey was designed to assess services for STIs at the 105 STI testing and treatment providers in the St. Louis metropolitan statistical area. Sexually transmitted infection testing providers included STI clinics, primary care clinics that cater to a broad population, and community-based organizations, and excluded emergency departments and urgent care centers. In most cases, the survey was completed by a clinic manager, medical director, or nursing staff member. RESULTS: Of the 75 locations that were interviewed, 12 (16%) had not returned to prepandemic capacity and operations as of July 2022. Five sites had closed completely since the pandemic began, 3 of which are in the northwestern region of the metropolitan statistical area. Most (58.6%) of the open clinics had added telehealth appointments. CONCLUSIONS: Sexually transmitted infection testing sites decreased during the pandemic with lasting impact in one area of the Midwest. Resources to support STI infrastructure should be expanded. Maintaining updated information on STI care providers in the region can aid future assessments.
