A comparison of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the anti-migraine compound almotriptan in healthy adolescents and adults.

This study was designed to assess and compare the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of almotriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D agonist used to treat migraine attacks, in adolescents and adults. Healthy adolescents (n = 18) and adults (n = 18) received a single 12.5-mg dose of almotriptan after fasting overnight. Plasma and urinary almotriptan concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters of almotriptan were determined by non-compartment analysis. The 90% confidence interval (CI) approach was employed to assess age effects. Mean Cmax, tmax, area under the curve (AUC0- infinity ), half-life, and percentage excreted in urine were nearly identical for the two populations. Mean oral (CLPO) and renal (CLR) clearances were similar between the age groups; however, weight-corrected CLPO was approximately 32% higher (90% CI 16, 51) in adolescents compared with adults. The higher weight-corrected CLPO appeared to offset increases in exposure expected on the basis of lower body weight in adolescents. The findings were the same when a subgroup (n = 9) of 12-14-year-old children was compared with adults. The type, incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between the two age groups and were consistent with those reported previously during adult clinical trials. Based on these pharmacokinetic and tolerability findings, no dose adjustment for almotriptan would be required when treating patients as young as 12 years old.

Effect of MAO-A inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of almotriptan, an antimigraine agent in humans.

AIMS: To assess the effect of a reversible MAO-A inhibitor, moclobemide, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of almotriptan and assess the clinical consequences of any interaction. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers received the following treatments in a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover design (with a 1 week washout between treatments): (A) one 150 mg moclobemide tablet every 12 h for 8 days and one 12.5 mg almotriptan tablet on the morning of day 8; and (B) one 12.5 mg almotriptan tablet on day 8. Plasma almotriptan was quantified by h.p.l.c.-MS-MS, while urinary concentrations were measured by h.p.l.c.-u.v. Vital signs, ECGs, and adverse events were evaluated after almotriptan administration. Treatment effects on pharmacokinetics and vital signs were assessed by analysis of variance. RESULTS: Mean almotriptan AUC was higher (483 +/- 99.9 vs 352 +/- 75.4 ng ml-1 h, P = 0.0001) and oral clearance was lower (26.6 +/- 4.00 vs 36.6 +/- 5.89 l h-1, P = 0.0001) when almotriptan was administered with moclobemide. Mean half-life was longer (4.22 +/- 0.78 vs 3.41 +/- 0.45 h, P = 0.0002) after coadministration with moclobemide. Renal clearance of almotriptan was unaffected by moclobemide. No serious adverse events occurred and no clinically significant vital sign changes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Moclobemide increased plasma concentrations of almotriptan on average by 37%, but the combined administration of these two compounds was well tolerated. The degree of interaction was much less than that seen previously for sumatriptan or zolmitriptan given with moclobemide.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between the antimigraine compound, almotriptan, and propranolol in healthy volunteers.

This study was designed to assess the pharmacokinetics of almotriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D agonist, when administered in the presence and absence of propranolol. Healthy male (n = 10) and female (n = 2) volunteers received (i) 80 mg propranolol twice daily for 7 days and 12.5 mg almotriptan on day 7, and (ii) 12.5 mg almotriptan on day 7, according to a two-way crossover design. Plasma and urinary almotriptan concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. Treatment effects on pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistically significant differences between treatments in area under the curve (AUC), clearance, and half-life were observed (P < 0.03), but these differences were < 7%. Ninety percent confidence interval analysis of log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters showed that the treatments were equivalent. Adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and no treatment effects on vital signs were observed. The results show that propranolol has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of almotriptan. Concomitant administration of the two drugs is well tolerated.

Evaluation of the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between almotriptan and fluoxetine in healthy volunteers.

This study was designed to assess the pharmacokinetics of almotriptan, a 5HT1B/1D agonist used to treat migraine attacks, when administered in the presence and absence of fluoxetine. Healthy male (n = 3) and female (n = 11) volunteers received (1) 60 mg fluoxetine daily for 8 days and 12.5 mg almotriptan on Day 8 and (2) 12.5 mg almotriptan on Day 8, according to a two-way crossover design. Plasma and urinary almotriptan concentrations were measured by HPLC methods. Treatment effects on pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed by analysis of variance. Mean almotriptan Cmax was significantly higher following combination treatment with fluoxetine (52.5 +/- 11.9 ng/ml vs. 44.3 +/- 10.9 ng/ml, p = 0.023). Mean AUC0-infinity was not significantly affected by fluoxetine coadministration (353 +/- 55.7 ng.h/ml vs. 333 +/- 33.6 ng.h/ml, p = 0.059). Confidence interval analysis (90%) of log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters showed that the confidence interval for AUC0-infinity was within the 80% to 125% limit for equivalence, but Cmax was not (90% CI 106%-134% of the reference mean). Adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and no clinically significant treatment effects on vital signs or ECGs were observed. The results show that fluoxetine has only a modest effect on almotriptan Cmax. Concomitant administration of the two drugs is well tolerated, and no adjustment of the almotriptan dose is warranted.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between verapamil and almotriptan in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the interaction between almotriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D-receptor agonist used to treat migraine, and verapamil, an agent for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers received the following treatments in a crossover design: (1) 120-mg sustained-release verapamil tablet twice daily for 7 days and one 12.5-mg almotriptan tablet on day 7 and (2) one 12.5-mg almotriptan tablet alone on day 7. Serial plasma and urine samples were obtained on day 7. Almotriptan plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; urine samples were analyzed by ultraviolet HPLC. Safety measures included blood pressure and pulse measurements, electrocardiography, and adverse event monitoring. Statistical comparisons of pharmacokinetic parameters and vital sign data were made by ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean almotriptan peak concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were significantly higher and volume of distribution and oral clearance were significantly lower after coadministration of almotriptan and verapamil compared with administration of almotriptan alone. The magnitudes of these differences were approximately 20%. Renal clearance was unaffected by verapamil coadministration. No significant effects of treatment on blood pressure or pulse were detected, with the exception of sitting systolic blood pressure at 2 hours after administration. However, the difference in mean change from baseline at this time point was only 8 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Verapamil modestly inhibited almotriptan clearance to a degree consistent with the modest contribution of CYP3A4 to almotriptan metabolism. This observation and the lack of effect of verapamil on the tolerability to almotriptan administration suggest that no reduction of the almotriptan dose is warranted.

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study of delavirdine and indinavir in healthy volunteers.

The potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between delavirdine, a nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and indinavir, an inhibitor of HIV protease, was evaluated in healthy volunteers. Subjects received a single 800-mg dose of indinavir sulfate on day 1 (baseline). Delavirdine mesylate 400 mg was administered three times daily on days 2 through 10. On day 9, a single 400-mg dose and on day 10 a single 600-mg dose of indinavir were given along with morning doses of delavirdine. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of indinavir were made on days 1, 9, and 10, and of delavirdine on days 8, 9, and 10. Fourteen healthy male volunteers completed the study. Single doses of indinavir had no clinically important effects on the pharmacokinetics of delavirdine. Mean indinavir Cmax values for the 400-mg and 600-mg doses administered concomitantly with delavirdine were dose proportionally lower than that observed following the 800-mg dose administered alone. Mean Tmax values were similar and ranged from 1.0 +/- 0.3/hour for indinavir 800 mg administered alone to 1.3 +/- 0.4/hour for indinavir 600 mg administered with delavirdine. These results indicate that delavirdine had no clinically important effect on the rate of indinavir absorption. In contrast, the mean indinavir AUC0-infinity, value following the 400-mg dose administered with delavirdine was only 14% lower than the baseline value determined for the 800-mg indinavir dose (25,400 +/- 6960 nM hour versus 29,600 +/- 7920 nM hour), and the mean indinavir AUC0-infinity value for the 600-mg indinavir dose administered with delavirdine (42,700 +/- 9800 nM hour) was 44% greater than the baseline value. All differences among mean AUC0-infinity values were statistically significant. Mean indinavir half-life values were slightly longer when indinavir was given in a dose with delavirdine than when indinavir was administered alone. These results suggest that delavirdine inhibits metabolism of indinavir and support the possibility of a reduction in the magnitude or frequency of indinavir dosage when given in combination with delavirdine.

Effect of fluconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients.

Fluconazole, an inhibitor of certain human cytochrome P-450 isozymes, is used for the prevention and treatment of a broad range of fungal infections that predominantly affect immunocompromised individuals. This study evaluated the influence of fluconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine, a nonnucleoside inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase, in 13 HIV-1-infected patients with CD4 counts ranging from 186 to 480/mm3. Both the control group (n = 5) and the fluconazole group (n = 8) received 300 mg of delavirdine mesylate every 8 h for 30 days; subjects in the fluconazole group took a 400-mg, once-daily dose of fluconazole on study days 16 to 30. Harvested plasma from serial blood samples collected on days 15, 16, and 30 were assayed for concentrations of delavirdine and its N-desalkyl metabolite by a reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Blood samples obtained on days 16 and 30 were also assayed for fluconazole by HPLC. Delavirdine mesylate alone and in combination with fluconazole was well tolerated. There were no significant differences (P > 0.16) in delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters between treatment groups on day 15 or day 30. After coadministration of fluconazole and delavirdine mesylate for 2 weeks (day 30), no significant differences (P > 0.058) were observed in any delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters relative to those after receiving delavirdine mesylate alone (day 15) after in the fluconazole group. Fluconazole pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those previously reported for healthy volunteers and HIV-positive patients. On the basis of these findings, fluconazole and delavirdine mesylate may be taken concurrently without adjustment of the dose of either drug.

Pharmacokinetic study of the interaction between rifabutin and delavirdine mesylate in HIV-1 infected patients.

The oxidative metabolism of delavirdine, a non-nucleoside inhibitor of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, is mediated in part by cytochrome P450 3A. The influence of rifabutin, an inducer of certain human cytochrome P450 isozymes, on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine was investigated in 12 HIV-positive patients with CD4 counts ranging from 75 to 671/mm3. Both the control group (n = 5) and the rifabutin group (n = 7) received 400 mg delavirdine mesylate every 8 h for 30 days; subjects in the rifabutin group took a 300 mg, once-daily dose of rifabutin on study days 16-30. Harvested plasma from serial blood samples collected after dosing on days 15, 16, and 30 was assayed for delavirdine and its N-desalkyl metabolite concentrations using a reversed-phase HPLC method. Blood samples obtained on days 16 and 30 were also assayed for rifabutin by HPLC. Delavirdine mesylate alone or in combination with rifabutin was well-tolerated. On day 30, statistically significant differences between groups were observed for all delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters (P < 0.046). After coadministration of rifabutin and delavirdine mesylate for 2 weeks, oral clearance of delavirdine increased five-fold, resulting in lower steady-state plasma delavirdine concentrations. Rifabutin pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those previously reported. Concomitant use of delavirdine and rifabutin at the recommended dose for each drug is discouraged. Maintaining therapeutic concentrations of delavirdine in patients on both medications may require dose modification.

Pharmacokinetic study of the interaction between rifampin and delavirdine mesylate.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of rifampin (INN, rifampicin), a potent inducer of cytochrome P450, on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine. METHODS: Twelve patients who were positive for human immunodeficiency virus, with CD4 counts ranging from 110 to 483/mm3, were randomized to two groups and studied in parallel. Both the control group (n = 5) and the rifampin group (n = 7) received 400 mg delavirdine mesylate every 8 hours for 30 days; subjects in the rifampin group took a 600 mg once-daily dose of rifampin on days 16 through 30. Harvested plasma from serial blood samples collected after dosing on days 15, 16, and 30 was assayed for delavirdine and its N-desalkyl metabolite concentrations with a reversed-phase HPLC method. Blood samples obtained on days 16 and 30 were also assayed for rifampin by HPLC. RESULTS: Delavirdine mesylate alone and in combination with rifampin was well tolerated. On day 30, statistically significant differences between groups were observed for all delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters (p < 0.049). In the rifampin group, delavirdine oral clearance increased by about 27-fold (p = 0.022), resulting in virtually negligible (< 0.09 mumol/L) steady-state through drug concentrations in all patients after 2 weeks of concurrent dosing of delavirdine mesylate and rifampin. The ratio of metabolite formation to elimination clearance for desalkyldelavirdine was significantly higher (3.9 +/- 1.2 versus 0.23 +/- 0.10) and delavirdine elimination half-life was significantly shorter (1.7 +/- 1.4 versus 4.3 +/- 1.3 hours) when delavirdine mesylate was taken with rifampin. Rifampin pharmacokinetic parameters on days 16 and 30 were similar to those previously reported for normal volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that rifampin induces the metabolism of delavirdine. Therefore therapy with rifampin is contraindicated in patients receiving delavirdine mesylate.

Determination of rifabutin in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection.

A simple, specific and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed for the determination of rifabutin in human plasma. Rifabutin and sulindac (internal standard) are extracted from human plasma using a C8 Bond Elut extraction column. Methanol (1 ml) is used to elute the compounds. The methanol is dried down under nitrogen and reconstituted in 250 microliters of mobile phase. Separation is achieved by HPLC on a Zorbax Rx C8 column with a mobile phase composed of 0.05 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.05 M sodium acetate at pH 4.0-acetonitrile (53:47, v/v). Detection is by ultraviolet absorbance at 275 nm. The retention times of rifabutin and internal standard were approximately 10.8 and 6.9 min, respectively. The assay is linear over the concentration range of 5-600 ng/ml. The quantitation limit was 5 ng/ml. Both intra-day and inter-day accuracy and precision data showed good reproducibility.

Determination of rifampin in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection.

A simple, specific and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed for the determination of rifampin in human plasma. Rifampin and sulindac (internal standard) are extracted from human plasma using a C2 Bond Elut extraction column. A 100-microliter volume of 0.1 M HCl is added to the plasma before extraction to increase the retention of the compounds on the extraction column. Methanol (1 ml) is used to elute the compounds and 0.5 ml of 3 mg/ml ascorbic acid in water is added to the final eluate to reduce the oxidation of rifampin. Separation is achieved by reversed-phase chromatography on a Zorbax Rx C8 column with a mobile phase composed of 0.05 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate-acetonitrile (55:45, v/v). Detection is by ultraviolet absorbance at 340 nm. The retention times of rifampin and internal standard are approximately 4.4 and 7.8 min, respectively. The assay is linear in concentration ranges of 50 to 35 000 ng/ml. The quantitation limit is 50 ng/ml. Both intra-day and inter-day accuracy and precision data showed good reproducibility.