Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Adv ; 8(50): eabo4082, 2022 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525485

ABSTRACT

The movement of selfish DNA elements can lead to widespread genomic alterations with potential to create novel functions. We show that transposon expansions in Caenorhabditis nematodes led to extensive rewiring of germline transcriptional regulation. We find that about one-third of Caenorhabditis elegans germline-specific promoters have been co-opted from two related miniature inverted repeat transposable elements (TEs), CERP2 and CELE2. These promoters are regulated by HIM-17, a THAP domain-containing transcription factor related to a transposase. Expansion of CERP2 occurred before radiation of the Caenorhabditis genus, as did fixation of mutations in HIM-17 through positive selection, whereas CELE2 expanded only in C. elegans. Through comparative analyses in Caenorhabditis briggsae, we find not only evolutionary conservation of most CERP2 co-opted promoters but also a substantial fraction that are species-specific. Our work reveals the emergence and evolutionary conservation of a novel transcriptional network driven by TE co-option with a major impact on regulatory evolution.

2.
Cell Rep ; 37(3): 109835, 2021 10 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34686342

ABSTRACT

The DREAM (dimerization partner [DP], retinoblastoma [Rb]-like, E2F, and MuvB) complex controls cellular quiescence by repressing cell-cycle and other genes, but its mechanism of action is unclear. Here, we demonstrate that two C. elegans THAP domain proteins, LIN-15B and LIN-36, co-localize with DREAM and function by different mechanisms for repression of distinct sets of targets. LIN-36 represses classical cell-cycle targets by promoting DREAM binding and gene body enrichment of H2A.Z, and we find that DREAM subunit EFL-1/E2F is specific for LIN-36 targets. In contrast, LIN-15B represses germline-specific targets in the soma by facilitating H3K9me2 promoter marking. We further find that LIN-36 and LIN-15B differently regulate DREAM binding. In humans, THAP proteins have been implicated in cell-cycle regulation by poorly understood mechanisms. We propose that THAP domain proteins are key mediators of Rb/DREAM function.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Retinoblastoma Protein/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , DNA Methylation , E2F Transcription Factors/genetics , E2F Transcription Factors/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Histones/genetics , Histones/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Binding , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs , Retinoblastoma Protein/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
3.
Genome Res ; 26(3): 301-14, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26728716

ABSTRACT

New genes contribute substantially to adaptive evolutionary innovation, but the functional evolution of new mammalian genes has been little explored at a broad scale. Previous work established mRNA-derived gene duplicates, known as retrocopies, as models for the study of new gene origination. Here we combine mammalian transcriptomic and epigenomic data to unveil the processes underlying the evolution of stripped-down retrocopies into complex new genes. We show that although some robustly expressed retrocopies are transcribed from preexisting promoters, most evolved new promoters from scratch or recruited proto-promoters in their genomic vicinity. In particular, many retrocopy promoters emerged from ancestral enhancers (or bivalent regulatory elements) or are located in CpG islands not associated with other genes. We detected 88-280 selectively preserved retrocopies per mammalian species, illustrating that these mechanisms facilitated the birth of many functional retrogenes during mammalian evolution. The regulatory evolution of originally monoexonic retrocopies was frequently accompanied by exon gain, which facilitated co-option of distant promoters and allowed expression of alternative isoforms. While young retrogenes are often initially expressed in the testis, increased regulatory and structural complexities allowed retrogenes to functionally diversify and evolve somatic organ functions, sometimes as complex as those of their parents. Thus, some retrogenes evolved the capacity to temporarily substitute for their parents during the process of male meiotic X inactivation, while others rendered parental functions superfluous, allowing for parental gene loss. Overall, our reconstruction of the "life history" of mammalian retrogenes highlights retroposition as a general model for understanding new gene birth and functional evolution.


Subject(s)
Evolution, Molecular , Mammals/genetics , Retroelements , Animals , Computational Biology/methods , Epigenesis, Genetic , Gene Expression Profiling , Genes , Humans , Molecular Sequence Annotation , Phylogeny , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid , Transcriptome , Vertebrates/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...