Harlequin syndrome after thyroidectomy for compressive retrosternal goiter. Case report and review of the literature.

A 74-year-old woman with known euthyroid multinodular retrosternal goiter necessitated an urgent intubation at home, due to acute respiratory distress evoked by tracheal compression. Extubation after a few days failed, and she underwent an urgent total thyroidectomy. During postoperative extubation the patient developed suddenly unilateral facial flushing and sweating at the left side, without ptosis of the left levator palpebrae superioris. These symptoms persisted during the next 24 hours. The skin at the right side of the face remained uninvolved. In the early postoperative period this appearance recurred at moments of emotions, exercise or heat. Beside this, the patient had a normal recovery. Six weeks later this reaction couldn't be provoked anymore. 'Harlequin' syndrome (unilateral facial flushing and sweating) is caused by a lesion of the controlateral sympathetic chain at the levels T2 and T3. It is unknown if the sweating and vasodilation at the "healthy" side is normal or if it is a reaction of hyperactivity.

Derivation and prospective testing of a two-step sevoflurane-O2-N2O low fresh gas flow sequence.

Simple vaporiser setting (F(D)) and fresh gas flow (FGF) sequences make the practice of low-flow anaesthesia not only possible but also easy to achieve. We sought to derive a sevoflurane F(D) sequence that maintains the end-expired sevoflurane concentration (F(A)sevo) at 1.3% using the fewest possible number of F(D) adjustments with a previously described O2-N2O FGF sequence that allows early FGF reduction to 0.7 l min(-1). In 18 ASA physical status I to IH patients, F(D) was determined to maintain F(A)sevo at 1.3% with 2 l min(-1) O2 and 4 l min(-1) N2O FGF for three minutes, and with 0.3 and 0.4 l min(-1) thereafter. Using the same FGF sequence, the F(D) schedule that approached the 1.3% F(A)sevo pattern with the fewest possible adjustments was prospectively tested in another 18 patients. The following F(D) sequence approximated the F(D) course well: 2% from zero to three minutes, 2.6% from three to 15 minutes and 2.0% after 15 minutes. When prospectively tested, median (25th; 75th percentile) performance error was 0.8 (-2.9; 5.9)%, absolute performance error 6.7 (3.3; 10.6)%, divergence 18.2 (-5.6; 27.4)%.h(-1) and wobble 4.4 (1.7; 8.1) %. In one patient, FGF had to be temporarily increased for four minutes. One O2/N2O rotameter FGF setting change from 6 to 0.7 l min(-1) at three minutes and two sevoflurane F(D) changes at three and 15 minutes maintained predictable anaesthetic gas concentrations during the first 45 minutes in all but one patient in our study.

Large volume N2O uptake alone does not explain the second gas effect of N2O on sevoflurane during constant inspired ventilation.

BACKGROUND: The second gas effect (SGE) is considered to be significant only during periods of large volume N(2)O uptake (VN(2)O); however, the SGE of small VN(2)O has not been studied. We hypothesized that the SGE of N(2)O on sevoflurane would become less pronounced when sevoflurane administration is started 60 min after the start of N(2)O administration when VN(2)O has decreased to approximately 125 ml min(-1), and that the kinetics of sevoflurane under these circumstances would become indistinguishable from those when sevoflurane is administered in O(2). METHODS: Seventy-two physical status ASA I-II patients were randomly assigned to one of six groups (n=12 each). In the first four groups, sevoflurane (1.8% vaporizer setting) administration was started 0, 2, 5 and 60 min after starting 2 litre min(-1) O(2) and 4 litre min(-1) N(2)O, respectively. In the last two groups, sevoflurane (1.8 or 3.6% vaporizer setting) was administered in 6 litre min(-1) O(2). The ratios of the alveolar fraction of sevoflurane (Fa) over the inspired fraction (Fi), or Fa/Fi, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Sevoflurane Fa/Fi was larger in the N(2)O groups than in the O(2) groups, and it was identical in all four N(2)O groups. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the existence of a SGE of N(2)O. Surprisingly, when using an Fa of 65% N(2)O, the magnitude of the SGE was the same with large or small VN(2)O. The classical model and the graphical representation of the SGE alone should not be used to explain the magnitude of the SGE. We speculate that changes in ventilation/perfusion inhomogeneity in the lungs during general anaesthesia result in a SGE at levels of VN(2)O previously considered by most to be too small to exert a SGE.