Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(3): 333-336, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of discontinuing contact precautions (CPs) for patients with select multidrug-resistant organisms on bacteremia infection rates was evaluated in this quality improvement project. METHODS: The removal of use of CPs, with increased focus on standard precautions, for all patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization/infection was piloted via a quality improvement project over a 3-month period. RESULTS: CP was discontinued in December 2018. Comparing 3 months pre- and postchange, the overall incidence density rate decreased for hospital-onset (HO) laboratory-identified (LabID) MRSA bacteremia (0.07 vs 0.02; P = .52), whereas HO LabID VRE bacteremia rates remained the same (0.00 vs 0.00). Overall estimated financial savings, including personal protective equipment ($15,375) and staff time ($17,165), was $32,540 for the project period, with annualized estimated savings of $130,160. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study evaluating the discontinuance of CPs, there was no evidence of an increase in HO MRSA or VRE LabID bacteremia incidence density rates. This practice change may be safely implemented at similar health care facilities.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Hospitals, Community/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Humans , Pilot Projects
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(10): 1119-21, 2015 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26164766

ABSTRACT

Surveillance for initial ventilator-associated events (VAEs) was automated and compared with nonautomated review of episodes of mechanical ventilation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of automated surveillance were very high (>93%), and automated surveillance reduced the time spent on detection of VAEs by >90%.


Subject(s)
Electronic Data Processing/methods , Epidemiological Monitoring , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(3): 283-91, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22314066

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine healthcare-associated infection (HAI) prevalence in 9 hospitals in Jacksonville, Florida; to evaluate the performance of proxy indicators for HAIs; and to refine methodology in preparation for a multistate survey. DESIGN: Point prevalence survey. PATIENTS: Acute care inpatients of any age. METHODS: HAIs were defined using National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. In each facility a trained primary team (PT) of infection prevention (IP) staff performed the survey on 1 day, reviewing records and collecting data on a random sample of inpatients. PTs assessed patients with one or more proxy indicators (abnormal white blood cell count, abnormal temperature, or antimicrobial therapy) for the presence of HAIs. An external IP expert team collected data from a subset of patient records reviewed by PTs to assess proxy indicator performance and PT data collection. RESULTS: Of 851 patients surveyed by PTs, 51 had one or more HAIs (6.0%; 95% confidence interval, 4.5%-7.7%). Surgical site infections ([Formula: see text]), urinary tract infections ([Formula: see text]), pneumonia ([Formula: see text]), and bloodstream infections ([Formula: see text]) accounted for 75.8% of 58 HAIs detected by PTs. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen, causing 9 HAIs (15.5%). Antimicrobial therapy was the most sensitive proxy indicator, identifying 95.5% of patients with HAIs. CONCLUSIONS: HAI prevalence in this pilot was similar to that reported in the 1970s by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control. Antimicrobial therapy was a sensitive screening variable with which to identify those patients at higher risk for infection and reduce data collection burden. Additional work is needed on validation and feasibility to extend this methodology to a national scale.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/etiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/etiology , Female , Florida/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Health Surveys , Hospitals , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prevalence , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...