[Laparoscopic appendectomy. Retrospective analysis of our experience compared with the literature]. / Appendicectomia laparoscopica. Analisi retrospettiva della nostra esperienza in rapporto alla letteratura.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) remain controversial. This study reports a critical examination of our experience in a peripheral hospital. METHODS: A total of 128 appendectomies have been performed since January 1996, of which 63 (49%) were laparoscopic. The patients included 52 (82.5%) females and 11 (17.5%) males with a mean age of 20.8 years (range 11-46). Emergency surgery was required in 6 cases (9.5%) and was elective in 57 (90.5%). Appendectomy was performed during another operation in 3 cases (laparoscopic cholecystectomy). RESULTS: Mortality was nil. Morbidity was 1.7% (1 case). The index of conversion was 0%. Only one major complication occurred. This took the form of perforation of an ileal loop following accidental lesion during adhesiolysis. The intraoperative diagnosis was not confirmed in 12 (19%) cases: 9 ovarian cysts, 1 terminal ilieitis and 2 cases of acute salpingitis. In 10 cases (15%) surgery was associated with adhesiolysis, and in 6 cases (9.3%) the appendix was retrocecal. Mean operating time was 42 min (range 18-105 min). The mean hospitalisation was 3.3 days. CONCLUSIONS: The authors emphasise the numerous advantages of laparoscopic techniques in their experience, including excellent cosmetic results, reduced PO pain, rapid functional recovery, lower incidence of adhesion, wound infection and laparocele, and more cost-effective when mechanical staplers are not used. Owing to the ability to explore the entire abdominal cavity, the main advantage of this technique consisted in a correct differential diagnostic balance, especially in young women of child-bearing age, between appendectomy and pathologies of the uterus and adnexa.

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our experience]. / Colecistectomia laparoscopica. Nostra esperienza.

BACKGROUND: The many advantages and extreme versatility made laparoscopic cholecystectomy (L.C.) the gold standard for symptomatic cholelithiasis. The aim of this research is a retrospective analysis of personal experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a peripheral hospital compared with the literature on the subject. METHODS: Since June 1982, a total of 989 L.C. have been performed. The patients were: 691 (68.6%) women and 298 (29.4%) men with a mean age of 56 years (range 17-84). The indications were: 791 symptomatic cholelithiasis, 142 chronic cholecystitis, 45 empyema-hydrops and 11 adenomyomatosis. RESULTS: No postoperative death have been observed and the conversion rate was of 24 cases (2.3%). The main complications were 3 cases of injury of the biliary tract and 2 cases of postoperative bleeding (1 from cystic artery and 1 from the umbilical wound). Minor complications observed were 12 cases (1.2%) of infections of the umbilical wound and 3 cases of umbilical hernia (0.3%). The elevation of stasis index was observed in 3 cases which solved spontaneously. The length of stay was 2 days in 957 cases (97%), 8 days in 24 cases and 4-5 days in 8 (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: No major trochar's lesions occurred, contrary to the percentages quoted in the literature (0.02%-0.9%). The selective use of the open technique and of the multiuse conic section trocar in the "closed" technique is suggested. The 3 cases of bile duct lesions did not occur during the training period, contrary to what quoted in the literature. In personal opinion, a careful surgical technique with a good Calot's triangle preparation, is necessary to prevent these inconveniences. Parietal complications (umbilical wound infections and laparocele) even if lesser than in the laparotomy technique, can be reduced by using the endobag and suturing the abdominal fascia of the 10 mm trocars. Moreover, the use of a systematic subhepatic drainage during the first 24 postoperative hours is suggested, since it can be useful to reveal possible bleeding.