[Our enemy : the clot. Coronary thrombosis : strategy and therapeutic arsenal]. / Notre ennemi : le caillot. Thrombose coronaire : stratégie et arsenal thérapeutique.

Intra coronary thrombus is  frequently encountered during acute coronary syndromes revascularisation procedures. It can also be encountered during angioplasty procedures in a stable angina context, although at a much lesser frequency.In both situations, it harbors a risk of poor angiographic result and poor prognosis. Intracoronnary thrombus may cause coronary occlusion at the angioplasty site or distal embolic  flow obstruction. Per procedure thrombus prevention rests on an prior optimal anti thrombotic treatment and in some circumstances the choice to defer the revascularisation procedure in the complex high risk setting. Treating the initiated thrombus remains controversial concerning thrombectomy and GPIIBIIIa inhibitors which are still in use in common practice. No reflow phenomenon is a particularly complex setting during cornary angioplasties, partially but not solely related to a thrombotic complication. It's treatment remains unclear in the absence of related oriented studies.The current mechanical and pharmacological antithrombotic therapies must remain common practice and used appropriately as of the clinical and angiographic setting, until further scientific outbrakes.

Heart failure with systolic dysfunction complicating acute myocardial infarction - differential outcomes but similar eplerenone efficacy by ST-segment or non-ST-segment elevation: A post hoc substudy of the EPHESUS trial.

BACKGROUND: Differential outcomes in patients with acute systolic heart failure (HF) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists according to non-ST-segment and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI, STEMI) status has not been specifically investigated. METHODS: In the EPHESUS study, 6632 patients with acute HF and left ventricular ejection fraction<40% were randomized 3-14 days post-AMI (median 7.3 ± 3.0 days) to receive eplerenone (n=3319) or placebo (n=3313). Among them, 6392 patients with available data on baseline ST-segment status (4634 STEMI; 1758 NSTEMI) were compared using a Cox model analysis stratified according to quintiles of propensity score (PS), taking into account major baseline risk factors, including revascularization. RESULTS: STEMI and NSTEMI patients differed significantly across a large variety of baseline characteristics. During 30 months of follow-up, all-cause death occurred in 19% and 13% (P<0.0001), cardiovascular death in 16% and 12% (P<0.0001), cardiovascular death and hospitalization in 33% and 26% (P<0.0001) and death from progression of HF in 5% and 3% (P<0.0001) of unadjusted NSTEMI and STEMI patients, respectively. After Cox model PS adjustment without revascularization, NSTEMI status still proved to be a risk factor for all-cause death, cardiovascular death and death from progression of HF. After Cox model PS adjustment including revascularization, none of the outcomes differed between STEMI and NSTEMI patients. Eplerenone morbidity and mortality benefits were consistent in the STEMI and NSTEMI subgroups. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute systolic HF complicating AMI, eplerenone improves outcomes equally in STEMI and NSTEMI patients. Worse outcomes associated with NSTEMI could be explained by more co-morbidities, less aggressive therapies and, mainly, less frequent revascularization.

Ischemic stroke associated with left cardiac catheterization: the importance of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Stroke associated with left cardiac catheterization is a devastating complication, and its incidence has not changed over the decades. We investigated the incidence, in-hospital outcomes and the modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for periprocedural ischemic stroke. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study included all patients experiencing periprocedural ischemic stroke among the 24,500 patients who underwent left cardiac catheterization between January 2003 and October 2010. The case group was compared with a group of control patients randomly selected among those who underwent the procedure during this period. RESULTS: Ischemic cerebrovascular events attested by brain imaging occurred in 37 patients (0.15% of procedures), transient ischemic attack occurred in 9 cases, and persistent neurological deficit occurred in 28 cases. Patients who developed strokes were more likely to be older and were more often female with a greater prevalence of comorbidities. Emergency and longer procedures were more frequent in patients in the case group who had more coronary complications. A multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.2; 95% CI 1.8-9.9; P < .001), chronic renal dysfunction (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.4; P < .001), known cerebrovascular disease (OR 5.1; 95% CI 2.3-11.5; P < .001), emergency procedure (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.4-9.2; P < .01) and recent congestive heart failure (OR 6.1; 95% CI 2.9-13; P < .001) as independent predictors for stroke. The independent modifiable predictive factors were represented by left ventricular angiography (OR 7.5; 95% CI 2.7-21; P < .001), and low operator volume (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.4; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Limiting the performance of left cardiac catheterization to high volume operators and avoiding unnecessary left ventricular angiography may reduce periprocedural ischemic stroke.