Effectiveness-implementation trial comparing a family model of diabetes self-management education and support with a standard model.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) is an effective approach for improving diabetes self-care behaviors to achieve improved glycemic management and other health outcomes. Engaging family members may improve outcomes, both for the person with diabetes (PWD) and for the family members. However, family models of DSMES have been inconsistently defined and delivered. We operationalize Family-DSMES to be generalizable and replicable, detail our protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial comparing Standard-DSMES with Family-DSMES on outcomes for PWDs and family members, and detail our mixed-methods implementation evaluation plan. METHODS: We will examine Family-DSMES relative to Standard-DSMES using a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation design. Participants are ≥18 years old with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hemoglobin A1c ≥7.0%, recruited from rural and urban primary care clinics that are part of an academic medical center. Each participant invites a family member. Dyads are randomly assigned to Family- or Standard-DSMES, delivered in a small-group format via telehealth. Data are collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6-, 12-, and 18-months post-intervention. Outcomes include PWDs' hemoglobin A1c (primary), other biometric, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes (secondary), and family members' diabetes-related distress, involvement in the PWD's diabetes management, self-efficacy for providing support, and biometric outcomes (exploratory). Our mixed-methods implementation evaluation will include process data collected during the trial and stakeholder interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. CONCLUSION: Results will fill knowledge gaps about which type of DSMES may be most effective and guide Family-DSMES implementation efforts. REGISTRATION: The trial is pre-registered at clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04334109).

Bilingual care navigation and enhanced case management during COVID-19.

COVID-19 disparities exposed health inequity across socioeconomic status, with community members of color experiencing higher rates of COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and death. Racial/ethnic differences were especially disparate in Benton and Washington counties in northwest Arkansas, a region in the United States that experienced high COVID-19 infection rates. To address these disparities and support families with COVID-19, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Community Clinic (a federally qualified health center) worked with the Arkansas Department of Health and community partners to develop systematic Care Navigation and Enhanced Case Management. During an initial screening process, contact tracers offered Care Navigation and Enhanced Case Management services to individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 within Washington and Benton counties. Bilingual community health navigators, social workers, and nurses began providing enhanced case management to households that accepted services. Between September 9, 2020 and June 19, 2021, 3,502 households representing ∼13,000 individuals were offered services, and 1,511 (43.1%) households requested/accepted services. Based on our experience, we provide four recommendations for practice: (a) provide contact tracing in community members' preferred language, (b) incorporate assessments into the contact tracing process to ensure community members have necessary resources for quarantine, (c) implement comprehensive care navigation and case management services for those who need additional support, and (d) integrate bilingual health navigators who are part of the target community into the process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Family model diabetes self-management education and support in faith-based organizations in the republic of the Marshall Islands study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Marshallese living in the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) experience significant health disparities, with high rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition to health disparities, the RMI experienced nuclear testing that exposed inhabitants to nuclear fallout, unethical research practices, and contaminated natural food sources. OBJECTIVES: This research uses a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to effectively engage community partners and honor their contributions in all stages of the research. A CBPR approach will leverage culturally situated knowledge and practices of the Marshallese community in the RMI to ensure the success of the research. METHODS: This manuscript describes the methods used to test the feasibility of delivering a culturally adapted family model of diabetes self-management education and support in faith-based organizations in the RMI. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript describes the protocol for creating working with community partners and implementing a feasibility study in the RMI.

Dissemination Protocol for Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships with Marshallese Pacific Islanders in Arkansas.

BACKGROUND: The Pacific Islander population in the United States (U.S.) has rapidly increased since 2000, especially in southern states like Arkansas where the largest population of Marshallese in the continental U.S. reside. The Marshallese community faces significant health disparities with high prevalence of diabetes, obesity, obesity-related cancers, and other chronic conditions. OBJECTIVES: Researchers have utilized a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach that fully engages Marshallese stakeholders in research to address the community's health disparities. Sharing research findings with participants and stakeholders is a core principle of CBPR. METHODS: This manuscript describes the methods that the academic-community research partnership used to develop a dissemination protocol for sharing results from multiple pilot studies and randomized control trials. Examples and details of specific activities that resulted from putting the dissemination plan in action are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of CBPR principles ensures that researchers fully engage stakeholders in all aspects of research, including the dissemination of study results. This manuscript describes the dissemination protocol for an academic- community research partnership with the Marshallese community and provides a practical example for how to implement successful community-engaged dissemination.